--
Boyan Penkov
www.boyanpenkov.com
> On Jul 10, 2019, at 15:30, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
>
> On 7/10/19, Boyan Penkov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> After the upgrade to 4.19.0-5, the irqbalance package is marked for
>> autoremoval. While I am not familiar with exac
On 7/10/19, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After the upgrade to 4.19.0-5, the irqbalance package is marked for
> autoremoval. While I am not familiar with exactly what it does,
> reading here -- https://packages.debian.org/buster/irqbalance -- does
> make it seem like a nice
On 7/10/19 2:28 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2019-07-10 14:15 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote:
After the upgrade to 4.19.0-5, the irqbalance package is marked for
autoremoval.
That is correct.
While I am not familiar with exactly what it does,
reading here -- https://packages.debian.org/buster
On 2019-07-10 14:15 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> After the upgrade to 4.19.0-5, the irqbalance package is marked for
> autoremoval.
That is correct.
> While I am not familiar with exactly what it does,
> reading here -- https://packages.debian.org/buster/irqbalance -- does
> make
Hello,
After the upgrade to 4.19.0-5, the irqbalance package is marked for
autoremoval. While I am not familiar with exactly what it does,
reading here -- https://packages.debian.org/buster/irqbalance -- does
make it seem like a nice feature, and worth having (and one that
4.19.0-4 made me have
On 5 May 2015 at 15:32, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Can you do some benchmarks with/without those options?
>
Good suggestion. Thanks.
Regards
Johann
--
Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself,
my lips will praise you. (Psalm 63:3)
What do I look for in the Bios (which is not an easy path to walk on the
server)?
it's too hard remember exaclty settings of bios...
I can then in /etc/default/irqbalance put OPTIONS = "--intpolicy=ignore"
but I am not sure what the effect will be on the server performance.
reboot the server often.
What do I look for in the Bios (which is not an easy path to walk on the
server)?
I see in the changelog of the Debian package that the suggested solution as
showed by the Ubuntu bug report was accepted as part of the Debian
Package.
I can then in /etc/default/irqbalance pu
Linux kbase 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt7-1 (2015-03-01)
x86_64 GNU/Linux
have you tried with other kernels and/or check bios settings?
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
On 5 May 2015 at 14:56, Pol Hallen wrote:
> which kernel do you use?
>
Linux kbase 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt7-1 (2015-03-01) x86_64
GNU/Linux
Regards
Johann
--
Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself,
my lips will praise you. (Psalm 63:3)
May 5 12:26:28 kbase /usr/sbin/irqbalance: irq 104 affinity_hint subset
empty
May 5 12:26:28 kbase /usr/sbin/irqbalance: irq 105 affinity_hint subset
empty
May 5 12:26:38 kbase /usr/sbin/irqbalance: irq 98 affinity_hint subset
empty
[...]
which kernel do you use?
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On our server with 32 cores we see this in /var/log/syslog.
May 5 12:26:28 kbase /usr/sbin/irqbalance: irq 104 affinity_hint subset
empty
May 5 12:26:28 kbase /usr/sbin/irqbalance: irq 105 affinity_hint subset
empty
May 5 12:26:38 kbase /usr/sbin/irqbalance: irq 98 affinity_hint subset
empty
Hello Stan,
Thx for this very clear explanation.
I am now sure my so small server do not require irqbalance.
--
Guy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
On 5/10/2013 3:39 AM, Guy Marcenac wrote:
> Le 09/05/2013 17:34, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
>> Or simply cron a stop/start of irqbalance some x minutes after bootup.
>
> Thank you Stan
>
> I tryied restarting irqbalance on my running system with
> /etc/init.d/irqbalance r
Le 09/05/2013 17:34, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Or simply cron a stop/start of irqbalance some x minutes after bootup.
Thank you Stan
I tryied restarting irqbalance on my running system with
/etc/init.d/irqbalance restart
But the warning still appears in the log...
I think I will wait for an
On 5/9/2013 10:21 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 5/9/2013 6:05 AM, Guy Marcenac wrote:
>
>> I have just upgraded to wheezy.
>> In my daemon .log, I noticed these warnings
>> May 9 10:00:15 kim2 /usr/sbin/irqbalance: WARNING: MSI interrupts found
>> in /proc/interrupt
On 5/9/2013 6:05 AM, Guy Marcenac wrote:
> I have just upgraded to wheezy.
> In my daemon .log, I noticed these warnings
> May 9 10:00:15 kim2 /usr/sbin/irqbalance: WARNING: MSI interrupts found
> in /proc/interrupts
> May 9 10:00:15 kim2 /usr/sbin/irqbalance: But none foun
On 05/09/2013 01:05 PM, Guy Marcenac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just upgraded to wheezy.
> In my daemon .log, I noticed these warnings
> May 9 10:00:15 kim2 /usr/sbin/irqbalance: WARNING: MSI interrupts found
> in /proc/interrupts
> May 9 10:00:15 kim2 /usr/sbin/irqbalan
Hello,
I have just upgraded to wheezy.
In my daemon .log, I noticed these warnings
May 9 10:00:15 kim2 /usr/sbin/irqbalance: WARNING: MSI interrupts found
in /proc/interrupts
May 9 10:00:15 kim2 /usr/sbin/irqbalance: But none found in sysfs, you
need to update your kernel
May 9 10:00:15
Hello,
I'm compiling a kernel for a smp box [1].
Now i found an option in menuconfig to activate 'irq balancing'.
I dont have an exact imagination what it does.
Is this recommended to use it on smp systems?
Also i found a debian package called 'irqbalance'.
It's a
20 matches
Mail list logo
