On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:12:08PM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
> > > pine, pico and pilot deb's are included in woody. you'll notice that the
> > > version numbers have an 'L' at the end of them. that signifi
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:12:08PM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
> > pine, pico and pilot deb's are included in woody. you'll notice that the
> > version numbers have an 'L' at the end of them. that signifies (i
> > believe) that they are not an unmodifi
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:12:08PM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
>
> > You can search the archives to find a link to the deb. There
> > are licensing issues with pine so Debian doesn't include it but
> > there are people who have built the debs. I just snagged the
> > latest stable re
Quoting Dwight Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> My condolences. I didn't realize you work at Stonehenge. :-)
Yep! BTW, from the Pine Info Center:
pine-bin.sun56 . . . . . . . . . Dec 5 16:53 9559k
which is 25% of my quota, whereas:
359784 Nov 11 1999 bin/mutt
> But then I think I would be at
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Johann Spies wrote:
> Another feature of mutt which I could not figure out with pine is the
> ability to check different mailboxes for new mail.
If you enable enable-incoming-folders and set incoming-folders to a list
of folder names and paths, you can use the TAB key to go t
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Dwight Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > These issues concern people who are _not_ beginners. Time is money and
> > taking a lot of time to configure an application is wasteful, when an equal
> > result can be achieved in much less time with Pin
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 12:42:19PM -0800, Dwight Johnson wrote:
> Only in one respect, that I can see based on my brief exposure, is mutt
> better -- mutt is a better _threaded_ mail reader. It looks like a lot of
> effort has been put into mutt's threading features. People who want a
> threaded ma
Quoting Dwight Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> These issues concern people who are _not_ beginners. Time is money and
> taking a lot of time to configure an application is wasteful, when an equal
> result can be achieved in much less time with Pine.
As I said, if you're used to pine, just use the
> You can search the archives to find a link to the deb. There
> are licensing issues with pine so Debian doesn't include it but
> there are people who have built the debs. I just snagged the
> latest stable release (source) from the pine web site. I had to
> insta
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Dwight Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, ktb wrote:
> >
> > > You might want to try mutt. I like it a lot better. It
> > > took some configuring but it isn't as clunky as pine.
> >
> > I have recently been trying mutt a
Quoting Dwight Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, ktb wrote:
>
> > You might want to try mutt. I like it a lot better. It
> > took some configuring but it isn't as clunky as pine.
>
> I have recently been trying mutt and, quite honestly, I have find mutt a
> lot clunkier
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Xucaen wrote:
> Hi all... curious.. I'm trying to install pine
> via apt-get but it tells me package found but
> can't be installed.. I don't have the exact
> error message (it was late. ;-).
> has anyone else been able to install pine?
Yes. Install pine4-diffs and everythi
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 01:12:27PM -0800, Dwight Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, ktb wrote:
>
> > You might want to try mutt. I like it a lot better. It
> > took some configuring but it isn't as clunky as pine.
>
> I have recently been trying mutt and, quite honestly, I have find mu
Dwight Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So I am very surprised to hear you say that you think Pine is clunkier than
> mutt. I would welcome learning in what ways.
I cut my teeth on Pine and Pico. About a year ago, I started playing with
mutt, and was quickly frustrated by the appearant comple
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, ktb wrote:
> You might want to try mutt. I like it a lot better. It
> took some configuring but it isn't as clunky as pine.
I have recently been trying mutt and, quite honestly, I have find mutt a
lot clunkier than Pine.
One example: when you call up Pine for the f
Xucaen wrote:
>
> Hi all... curious.. I'm trying to install pine
> via apt-get but it tells me package found but
> can't be installed.. I don't have the exact
> error message (it was late. ;-).
> has anyone else been able to install pine?
yes i downloaded the 3rd party pine packages a while bac
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 09:55:42AM -0800, Xucaen wrote:
> Hi all... curious.. I'm trying to install pine
> via apt-get but it tells me package found but
> can't be installed.. I don't have the exact
> error message (it was late. ;-).
> has anyone else been able to install pine?
>
You ca
Hi all... curious.. I'm trying to install pine
via apt-get but it tells me package found but
can't be installed.. I don't have the exact
error message (it was late. ;-).
has anyone else been able to install pine?
thanks
xucaen
__
Do You Yahoo!?
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Larry Huffman wrote:
> steps taken:
>
> dpkg-source -x pine_v.dsc
> cd pine
> debian/rules binary (as root)
>
> error message received:
>
> test -f pine/pine.c -a -f debian/rules
> debian/rules binaryPine
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/pine/pine-v'
> test -f pine/p
After two years of using Red Hat, I've turned my attention to Debian
(Slink), and am learning my way around the packaging system, apt, and
dpkg.
I'm now trying to install Pine. (This message, BTW, is coming from my
shell account at my ISP, hence it being from Pine.) I've tried to install
both of t
Darknight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, whenever I try to build it using
> the linux option, I get an error "ld cannot open -ltermcap: no such file
> or directory."
Do you have ncurses-dev (sp?) installed? AFAIR it installs
libtermcap.* as symlinks to libcurses.*.
--
Henning Makholm
ht
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Darknight wrote:
> I'm not sure if I missed a package when downloading hamm or something,
> but pine was not included, so I downloaded the newest version available
> from washington university. However, whenever I try to build it using
> the linux option, I get an error "ld c
The pine license doesn't permit distribution of modified binaries, so you
should get the pine396-src and pine396-diff packages and build the debian
package (see /usr/src/pine/README after installing the packages).
Also, there's a newer version of pine in /debian/project/experimental on
the Debian
I'm not sure if I missed a package when downloading hamm or something,
but pine was not included, so I downloaded the newest version available
from washington university. However, whenever I try to build it using
the linux option, I get an error "ld cannot open -ltermcap: no such file
or directory
On Fri, 2 Oct 1998, Daniel Mashao wrote:
> Anybody installed this package from project/experimental?
>
> I replaced -ltermcap with -lncurses as suggested elsewhere but still I
> cannot compile the package becuase it is looking for a crypt() function.
Once more I have to say: Please, do not mod
Anybody installed this package from project/experimental?
I replaced -ltermcap with -lncurses as suggested elsewhere but still I
cannot compile the package becuase it is looking for a crypt() function.
Any help?
I am having a problem with apps that are color intensive (eg netscape) and
font int
26 matches
Mail list logo
