On 20120326_074231, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
> > > On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > >>> I'm sure some/many of you will gasp at that fact I still use EXT2. If
> > >>> it ain't broke, don't "fix" it.
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
> > On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Paul E Condon wrote:
> >>> I'm sure some/many of you will gasp at that fact I still use EXT2. If
> >>> it ain't broke, don't "fix" it. The /boot and root filesystems are on
> >>> EXT2, with all data
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Paul E Condon wrote:
>>> I'm sure some/many of you will gasp at that fact I still use EXT2. If
>>> it ain't broke, don't "fix" it. The /boot and root filesystems are on
>>> EXT2, with all data storage on XFS. Never had problems with EXT2 in
>>>
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > I'm sure some/many of you will gasp at that fact I still use EXT2. If
> > it ain't broke, don't "fix" it. The /boot and root filesystems are on
> > EXT2, with all data storage on XFS. Never had problems with EXT2 in
> > this setup, so it lives on, fo
On 20120325_010923, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 3/24/2012 4:02 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> > 2012/3/24 shirish शिरीष :
>
> >> # TMPFS_SIZE: maximum size for all tmpfs filesystems if no specific
> >> # size is provided. If no value is provided here, the kernel default
> >> # will be used.
> >> TMPFS
5 matches
Mail list logo