Gaël DONVAL wrote:
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 16:47 +0200, Sven Hartge a écrit :
Maybe the alignment of the swap partition is off? SSD react very badly
if you don't align your partitions to their erase block size. This is
why I always recommend to align them to 1MB boundaries as most SSDs
availa
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 16:47 +0200, Sven Hartge a écrit :
> Maybe the alignment of the swap partition is off? SSD react very badly
> if you don't align your partitions to their erase block size. This is
> why I always recommend to align them to 1MB boundaries as most SSDs
> available today seem
Gary Dale wrote:
> So why would switching to an SSD slow hibernation times? Frankly I can't
> think of any reasons (comparing apples to apples) why a faster drive
> should lead to slower performance. Possibly it's an interface issue -
> the SSD's controller is getting swamped - while the HDD t
On 24/08/12 08:29 AM, Gaël DONVAL wrote:
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:58 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Gaël DONVAL wrote:
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:04 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
I might be wrong here, but isn't the key benefit of SSDs that they
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:58 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Gaël DONVAL wrote:
> > Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:04 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
> > > I might be wrong here, but isn't the key benefit of SSDs that they have
> > > a tiny access time? Bu
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Gaël DONVAL wrote:
> Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:04 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
> > I might be wrong here, but isn't the key benefit of SSDs that they have
> > a tiny access time? But that their read speed is about the same as a
> > normal disk (also, I
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:04 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
> I might be wrong here, but isn't the key benefit of SSDs that they have
> a tiny access time? But that their read speed is about the same as a
> normal disk (also, I might be wrong, but I understand their write speed
> is average).
Th
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:00:46AM -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mindful of what Stan Hoeppner in various posts has written about SSD
> I thought I'd put swap on an SSD I installed (Samsung SSD 830 128GB)
> in order to get superfast hibernate.
I might be wrong here, but isn't the key benefit o
On 8/24/2012 3:43 AM, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:42:45AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> This email mentions nothing of any troubleshooting performed by you up
>> to this point. It's sole purpose seems to be to blame me for what you
>> apparently believe is a bad recommendation
Le jeudi 23 août 2012 à 10:00 -0500, hvw59601 a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Mindful of what Stan Hoeppner in various posts has written about SSD I
> thought I'd put swap on an SSD I installed (Samsung SSD 830 128GB) in
> order to get superfast hibernate.
>
> Surprise: it is slower than usual and the disk
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:42:45AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> This email mentions nothing of any troubleshooting performed by you up
> to this point. It's sole purpose seems to be to blame me for what you
> apparently believe is a bad recommendation.
I read it very differently: veiled admirati
On 8/23/2012 10:00 AM, hvw59601 wrote:
> Mindful of what Stan Hoeppner in various posts has written about SSD I
> thought I'd put swap on an SSD I installed (Samsung SSD 830 128GB) in
> order to get superfast hibernate.
>
> Surprise: it is slower than usual and the disk light is on.
[snip]
> Is t
Hi,
Mindful of what Stan Hoeppner in various posts has written about SSD I
thought I'd put swap on an SSD I installed (Samsung SSD 830 128GB) in
order to get superfast hibernate.
Surprise: it is slower than usual and the disk light is on.
swap is here:
+ cat /proc/swaps
Filename
13 matches
Mail list logo
