thank you very very much to everybody that has helped me out with my
upgrade problems, i'm going to give all your advice a try this morning.
should be fun!
david
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:13:20AM -0700, David Millet wrote:
> they said that the stable debian might be a little outdated and i didnt
> listen. but they were right! it installed well, it was stable, but it
> was outdated. and me, being the kind of guy that will spend the extra
> $10,000 fo
Don't take my word for it, i still consider myself a noob and probably
will always do:)
But i have been running debian for a long time now, my experience with
testing is it sometimes can take a long time for a package to get
updated, so if something is broke you can end up being stuck with it fo
- Original Message -
From: "David Millet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 12:13 PM
Subject: got my woody working, wanted to upgrade, already ruined my system
> so hi, its me the debian noob
huh? am i hearing your right?
Stable is very stable...i'm learning to live with it now since last
week's mess i had with SID.
Stable for my DVR/imap/samba sever, SID/winXP on the desktop
beast...so if SID goes bonkers on me i just go back to winXP for a few
days and then run an apt update which
I think as you say all you have to do, or at least that's how i did it a
few times is, update your sources list and point to testing aswell,
apt-get update,
apt-get dist-upgrade.
Seems a whole lot better than downloading 2 iso's again.
Stable is very stable...i'm learning to live with it now sinc
so hi, its me the debian noob again, already breaking my oath to not bug
you folks too much with my issues, but oh well, i'd appreciate some help
anyways.
they said that the stable debian might be a little outdated and i didnt
listen. but they were right! it installed well, it was stable, but
7 matches
Mail list logo
