On 27/01/2025 04:00, Van Snyder wrote:
I just bought a new MB with an Intel i9-14900 processor. /proc/cpuinfo
says there are 32 processors — 24 cores with eight of them having two
hyperthreads.
gkrellm only shows 16 of the 32 threads; the other 16 are presumably
below the bottom of the
I just bought a new MB with an Intel i9 processor. /proc/cpuinfo says
there are 32 processors — I think 24 cores with eight of them having
two hyperthreads, or something like that.
gkrellm only shows 16 of the 32 threads; the other 16 are presumably
below the bottom of the screen. Is there a
I just bought a new MB with an Intel i9-14900 processor. /proc/cpuinfo
says there are 32 processors — 24 cores with eight of them having two
hyperthreads.
gkrellm only shows 16 of the 32 threads; the other 16 are presumably
below the bottom of the screen. Is there a version of gkrellm, newer
than
On 10/29/23 14:27, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2023 13:18:13 CET gene heskett wrote:
It seems Bill Wilsons site for gkrellm stuff has expired.
This site is still active: http://gkrellm.srcbox.net/
New site, the docs don't mention it, thanks for the link. bookmarked.
On Saturday, 28 October 2023 13:18:13 CET gene heskett wrote:
> It seems Bill Wilsons site for gkrellm stuff has expired.
This site is still active: http://gkrellm.srcbox.net/
All the best
On 10/28/23 18:15, John Hasler wrote:
Gene writes:
s/t be an xsensors.conf to edit?
/etc/sensors3.conf is it.
Figures, maybe it will improve after the next reboot.
Thanks John.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Pl
Gene writes:
> s/t be an xsensors.conf to edit?
/etc/sensors3.conf is it.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 10/28/23 16:42, John Hasler wrote:
Install xsensors and read the man page. You may need to run
sensors-detect and perhaps edit /etc/sensors3.conf.
Thanks John, done that, modprobed nct6775, but no additional stuff shows
in xsensors output, just the usual temps. e/sensors3.conf does have
Install xsensors and read the man page. You may need to run
sensors-detect and perhaps edit /etc/sensors3.conf.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 10/28/23 09:57, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 07:18:13 -0400
gene heskett wrote:
It seems Bill Wilsons site for gkrellm stuff has expired. and gkrellm
seems to be suffering from a lack of maintainer. What is replacing it
as a fans and voltages monitor? Preferably something just
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 07:56:38 -0600
Charles Curley wrote:
> I use sensors and an XFCE plugin to display selected data.
sensors is the program. The lm-sensors package provides it.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 07:18:13 -0400
gene heskett wrote:
> It seems Bill Wilsons site for gkrellm stuff has expired. and gkrellm
> seems to be suffering from a lack of maintainer. What is replacing it
> as a fans and voltages monitor? Preferably something just as tiny and
> informa
It seems Bill Wilsons site for gkrellm stuff has expired. and gkrellm
seems to be suffering from a lack of maintainer. What is replacing it as
a fans and voltages monitor? Preferably something just as tiny and
information fill as gkrellm is/was
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four
>> What do other people use instead?
> Please see other replies in this thread from Darac and myself.
I had seen them before I posted my question :-(
IIUC they don't support reporting data about remote hosts, nor do
they seem to offer a comparably compact representation of the data.
Stef
On Sun, 2023-09-17 at 13:26 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > gkrellm depends on gtk2 and should be avoided IMHO.
>
> Gkrellm's maintenance is indeed a worry, but I haven't found anything
> even remotely competitive as a replacement in terms and quantity and
> quality
> gkrellm depends on gtk2 and should be avoided IMHO.
Gkrellm's maintenance is indeed a worry, but I haven't found anything
even remotely competitive as a replacement in terms and quantity and
quality of information it's able to show me in a small space (about my
machine a
b for 7 may, the last day I ran wheezy.
> >
> > What should I check next?
>
> I guess you hit
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895851
>
> Manually create the dir and place a symlink there should solve this
> bug unless someone fix it.
>
One could
On 02.06.19 21:35, Gene Heskett wrote:
> gkrellm's weather pluggin worked flawlessly for wheezy, doesn't work on
> stretch. I just re-installed it all and I am still looking at the
> weather from kckb for 7 may, the last day I ran wheezy.
>
> What should I check next?
I guess you hit
https://
Greetings al;
gkrellm's weather pluggin worked flawlessly for wheezy, doesn't work on
stretch. I just re-installed it all and I am still looking at the
weather from kckb for 7 may, the last day I ran wheezy.
What should I check next?
Thanks.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to b
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 18:16:18 +0100
Jürgen Köhler wrote:
> I have a little "problem" in testing with gkrellm last updated since:
> a conflict between gkrellm and digikam
Not sure how far testing is behind unstable, but there has been a
serious problem in the sensors area of unsta
I have a little "problem" in testing with gkrellm last updated since:
a conflict between gkrellm and digikam
gkrellm
gkrellm : Hängt ab von: libsensors4 (>= 1:3.0.0) soll aber nicht
installiert werden
root@jk:/home/juergen1# apt-get -s install
libsensors4
Paket
On 06/01/2014 11:51 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 01/06/14 02:20 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2014-06-01, Gary Dale wrote:
Curious. I noticed that nepomuk-server and dolphin both had a number of
zombie processes (around 16 each) attached. I killed the parent
processes then did a reinstall of dolphin and libne
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 14:18:56 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> Curiouser still. After a reboot, nepomukserver didn't start. Dolphin
> is still creating zombie processes but without nepomukserver, I
> haven't seen any fresh slowdowns. I'm not sure why nepomukserver
> isn't starting, but that's not a priori
On 01/06/14 02:20 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2014-06-01, Gary Dale wrote:
Curious. I noticed that nepomuk-server and dolphin both had a number of
zombie processes (around 16 each) attached. I killed the parent
processes then did a reinstall of dolphin and libnepomukcore4.
Nepomuk-server isn't running b
On 2014-06-01, Gary Dale wrote:
>
> Curious. I noticed that nepomuk-server and dolphin both had a number of
> zombie processes (around 16 each) attached. I killed the parent
> processes then did a reinstall of dolphin and libnepomukcore4.
> Nepomuk-server isn't running but I did restart dolphin
I recently installed Gkrellm (using default settings) to see
what is
happening when my system grinds to a halt. The only unusual
part I see
in it is that the procs box has the brown line climbing to the
top of
the chart. Interestingly, the slope of the brown line continues
throughout the slowd
essie on an AMD64 system using KDE. My system
periodically grinds to a halt for a minute or so then resumes as if
nothing had happened. This only happens when I'm running KDE.
Gnome and
xfce work properly, even with the same applications open.
I recently installed Gkrellm (using default se
ystem
periodically grinds to a halt for a minute or so then resumes as if
nothing had happened. This only happens when I'm running KDE. Gnome and
xfce work properly, even with the same applications open.
I recently installed Gkrellm (using default settings) to see what is
happening when my sys
ystem
periodically grinds to a halt for a minute or so then resumes as if
nothing had happened. This only happens when I'm running KDE. Gnome and
xfce work properly, even with the same applications open.
I recently installed Gkrellm (using default settings) to see what is
happening when my sys
>>>>> I'm running Debian/Jessie on an AMD64 system using KDE. My system
>>>>> periodically grinds to a halt for a minute or so then resumes as if
>>>>> nothing had happened. This only happens when I'm running KDE. Gnome and
>>>>&
thing had happened. This only happens when I'm running KDE. Gnome and
xfce work properly, even with the same applications open.
I recently installed Gkrellm (using default settings) to see what is
happening when my system grinds to a halt. The only unusual part I see
in it is that the procs b
so then resumes as if
>>> nothing had happened. This only happens when I'm running KDE. Gnome and
>>> xfce work properly, even with the same applications open.
>>>
>>> I recently installed Gkrellm (using default settings) to see what is
>>> happening
On Sat, 31 May 2014 12:26:01 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> Any ideas on what would be causing a periodic slowdown in KDE? Or any
> suggestions on how to identify the source of the problem?
This is pure guess, not a valid troubleshooting diagnostic test, but
back in the days when I had KDE libraries
xfce work properly, even with the same applications open.
I recently installed Gkrellm (using default settings) to see what is
happening when my system grinds to a halt. The only unusual part I see
in it is that the procs box has the brown line climbing to the top of
the chart. Interestingly, the sl
I'm running Debian/Jessie on an AMD64 system using KDE. My system
periodically grinds to a halt for a minute or so then resumes as if
nothing had happened. This only happens when I'm running KDE. Gnome and
xfce work properly, even with the same applications open.
I recently install
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:06:27 +0100 "Darac Marjal
mailingl...@darac.org.uk" sent this:
>On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 03:30:26PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
>>
>> I use GKrellM to monitor some things including my
>> Ethernet connecti
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 03:30:26PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
>
> I use GKrellM to monitor some things including my
> Ethernet connection on a Debian Wheezy Operating
> system on an Acer 3614WLCI Aspire laptop with 512MB RAM.
>
> I know t
I use GKrellM to monitor some things including my
Ethernet connection on a Debian Wheezy Operating
system on an Acer 3614WLCI Aspire laptop with 512MB RAM.
I know the computer is old, but GKrellM registers my Ethernet as 235 or
345 or 180 or 4.1K
I'm on Etch. I have installed lm sensors and gkrellm. I can get sensor
data by running $>sudo sensors, but gkrellm does not display the data.
When I go into gkrellm under "builtins" it is blank.
Any suggestions? The motherboard is ASUS A7V8X
Thank you,
rd
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 07:42:30PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty on 22/08/07 03:57, wrote:
>
> >On my box, with Asus M2N-SLI Deluxe AM2 (Athlon64) running amd64, mbmon
> >shows three temps but doesn't get all the volts. I also don't know
> >as the temps are accurate; would the CPU r
Adam Hardy on 22/08/07 19:42, wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty on 22/08/07 03:57, wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:16:01PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Temp.= 29.0, 0.0, 0.0; Rot.= 998, 4927,0
Vcore = 1.63, 3.23; Volt. = 2.91, 5.05, 6.08, 5.99, -7.71
Temp.= 29.0, 0.0, 0.0; Rot.= 998, 4
Douglas A. Tutty on 22/08/07 03:57, wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:16:01PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Temp.= 29.0, 0.0, 0.0; Rot.= 998, 4927,0
Vcore = 1.63, 3.23; Volt. = 2.91, 5.05, 6.08, 5.99, -7.71
Temp.= 29.0, 0.0, 0.0; Rot.= 998, 4891,0
Vcore = 1.65, 3.23; Volt. =
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:16:01PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Temp.= 29.0, 0.0, 0.0; Rot.= 998, 4927,0
> Vcore = 1.63, 3.23; Volt. = 2.91, 5.05, 6.08, 5.99, -7.71
>
> Temp.= 29.0, 0.0, 0.0; Rot.= 998, 4891,0
> Vcore = 1.65, 3.23; Volt. = 2.91, 5.05, 6.08, 5.99, -7.71
>
Adam Hardy wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom on 21/08/07 14:35, wrote:
Adam Hardy wrote:
I set up etch on a new pc and gkrellm can't find any CPU or mobo
monitors for temperature monitoring. My other older system uses mbmon
and hdmon. Is this out of date now?
When I start mbmon on the new b
can use lm-sensors *or* mbmon. If mbmon does not work, disable it in
the gkrellm configuration dialog. The lm-sensors settings can be adjusted
in /etc/sensors.conf (if needed).
Peter
--
Peter Greff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
Hugo Vanwoerkom on 21/08/07 14:35, wrote:
Adam Hardy wrote:
I set up etch on a new pc and gkrellm can't find any CPU or mobo
monitors for temperature monitoring. My other older system uses mbmon
and hdmon. Is this out of date now?
When I start mbmon on the new box it complains: Sta
Adam Hardy wrote:
I set up etch on a new pc and gkrellm can't find any CPU or mobo
monitors for temperature monitoring. My other older system uses mbmon
and hdmon. Is this out of date now?
When I start mbmon on the new box it complains: Starting motherboard
sensor monitoring daemo
I set up etch on a new pc and gkrellm can't find any CPU or mobo monitors for
temperature monitoring. My other older system uses mbmon and hdmon. Is this out
of date now?
When I start mbmon on the new box it complains: Starting motherboard sensor
monitoring daemon: No Hardware Monitor
> Hi all.
> I've seen this strange thing, monitoring my laptop resources.
> If in the same moment I launch 'top' (shell) and 'torsmo' or 'gkrellm'
> (gui), those are the results:
> - top
> Mem: total 1555704Kused 1355420K free 2002
Hi all.I've seen this strange thing, monitoring my laptop resources.If in the same moment I launch 'top' (shell) and 'torsmo' or 'gkrellm' (gui), those are the results:- topMem: total 1555704K used 1355420K free 200284K
- gkrellmMem Total 1519MB - Mem
hi ya
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, MillTek wrote:
> >>Can anyone recommend a good tutorial in using GKrellM to monitor system
> >>and cpu temps and fan speeds? I've read a few but so far have only been
> >>
> >>able to get CPU temp sdisplayed. My board is an
Alvin Oga wrote:
hi ya
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, MillTek wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good tutorial in using GKrellM to monitor system
and cpu temps and fan speeds? I've read a few but so far have only been
able to get CPU temp sdisplayed. My board is an Abit NF7-M with Athlon
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 01:09:19 -0400
MillTek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a good tutorial in using GKrellM to monitor system
and cpu temps and fan speeds? I've read a few but so far have only been
able to get CPU temp sdisplayed. My board
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 01:09:19 -0400
MillTek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Can anyone recommend a good tutorial in using GKrellM to monitor system
> and cpu temps and fan speeds? I've read a few but so far have only been
>
> able to get CPU temp sdisplayed. M
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a good tutorial in using GKrellM to monitor system
and cpu temps and fan speeds? I've read a few but so far have only been
able to get CPU temp sdisplayed. My board is an Abit NF7-M with Athlon 2500.
Thanks,
Jim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
This thing was broken since about January 2004, when it would complain
"500 LWP::Protocol::MyFTP: Bad hostname 'weather.noaa.gov' at
/usr/share/gkrellm/GrabWeather line 49."
I finally took the time to look into it and someone on google
mentioned it was dying on passive ftp.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 07:04:23PM +0900, Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
> I had a bare debian box without any x libraries. I wanted to install
> gkrellm and xforward it to another box. so I did an apt-get install
> gkrellm and turned on the X11Forward in sshd and logged into the box
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I had a bare debian box without any x libraries. I wanted to install
gkrellm and xforward it to another box. so I did an apt-get install
gkrellm and turned on the X11Forward in sshd and logged into the box
with ssh -X box ... BUT I just got an
I like to have gkrellm always viewable in gnome and so have been using
it with gnome-swallow-applet.
Sometimes when I start up gnome it becomes part of the panel and other
times it just floats there like any other window and there is only
a small dark square in the dock.
Any ideas on why the
hello,
I'm running gkrellm on a SMP box (dual Celeron, Abit BP6) and it uses
60-70% of one CPU.
Otherwise on a single-CPU box it only uses ~3%?
Is gkrellm not SMP save?
I'm using unstable
Peter
PS: sorry for my earlier german post
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hallo Liste,
Ich habe hier gkrellm im Einsatz. Nur lastet das meinen Server (Dual
Celeron 466, Abit BP6) auf einer CPU zu ca. 60% aus, was auf einem
Single-Prozessor-Rechner nicht der Fall ist (ca 2-3%).
Ist gkrellm nicht SMP-Save?
gkrellm Version 2.1.24-1 aus unstable
Peter
--
To
14:28, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
| > > -- Mark L. Kahnt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
| > > (on Friday, 31 January 2003, 12:33 PM -0500):
| > > > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 09:38, Francois Chenais wrote:
| > > > > Is there any application launcher f
gt; On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 09:38, Francois Chenais wrote:
> > > > Is there any application launcher for GKrellm.
> > > > Don't find one with apt-cache search ?
> > >
> > > There is one that I use and find it works very nicely - I have a series
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:28, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> -- Mark L. Kahnt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> (on Friday, 31 January 2003, 12:33 PM -0500):
> > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 09:38, Francois Chenais wrote:
> > > Is there any application launcher for GKrellm.
-- Mark L. Kahnt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Friday, 31 January 2003, 12:33 PM -0500):
> On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 09:38, Francois Chenais wrote:
> > Is there any application launcher for GKrellm.
> > Don't find one with apt-cache search ?
>
> There is one t
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 09:38, Francois Chenais wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any application launcher for GKrellm.
> Don't find one with apt-cache search ?
>
> François
There is one that I use and find it works very nicely - I have a series
of but
-- Francois Chenais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Friday, 31 January 2003, 03:38 PM +0100):
> Is there any application launcher for GKrellm.
> Don't find one with apt-cache search ?
apt-get install gkrellmlaunch
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
Is there any application launcher for GKrellm.
Don't find one with apt-cache search ?
François
msg27620/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
seems that /dev/isdninfo doesn't like fopen, fread functions. I've patched
gkrellm's net.c to use open, read functions and it works, now.
Patrik
msg22209/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
got strange problem. Gkrellm can't read /dev/isdninfo when I'm connected
through my ISDN line.
I've found that:
- head -n 6 /dev/isdninfo works connected or not.
- cat /dev/isdninfo works only when not connected.
- gkrellm's net builtin reads /dev/isdninfo only when not c
On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Hubert Chan wrote:
> > "Patrick" == Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Patrick> On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Hubert Chan wrote:
> >> then download and install the gkacpi plugin:
> >> http://gkacpi.sourceforge.net/
>
> Patrick> OK, I did that and now I get the follow
> "Patrick" == Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Patrick> On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Hubert Chan wrote:
>> then download and install the gkacpi plugin:
>> http://gkacpi.sourceforge.net/
Patrick> OK, I did that and now I get the following error:
Patrick> Can't find any battery.
Patrick> T
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Hubert Chan wrote:
> then download and install the gkacpi plugin:
> http://gkacpi.sourceforge.net/
OK, I did that and now I get the following error:
Can't find any battery.
This system supports old ACPI. Patch your kernel.
My laptop's a fairly old Toshiba Portege, but with
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Hubert Chan wrote:
> >>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Patrick> Having enabled ACPI (and so disabled APM), whenever I start
> Patrick> gkrellm it complains (twice no less!) that there is n
>>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Patrick> Having enabled ACPI (and so disabled APM), whenever I start
Patrick> gkrellm it complains (twice no less!) that there is no battery
Patrick> available. Can I quell that behavior
Having enabled ACPI (and so disabled APM), whenever I start gkrellm it
complains (twice no less!) that there is no battery available. Can I
quell that behavior? (If not, I'm losing grkrellm!)
Patrick
--
Patrick Wiseman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux user #17943
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Em Qua, 2002-02-13 às 03:04, Vineet Kumar escreveu:
> * Michel Loos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020212 16:47]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > continuing around e-mail applications with imaps:)
> > Is there any way to use gkrellm with an imaps server ?
> > Seems the buildin mail ap
* Michel Loos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020212 16:47]:
> Hi,
>
> continuing around e-mail applications with imaps:)
> Is there any way to use gkrellm with an imaps server ?
> Seems the buildin mail application does not work and I was unable to
> configure mailwatch for external
Hi,
continuing around e-mail applications with imaps:)
Is there any way to use gkrellm with an imaps server ?
Seems the buildin mail application does not work and I was unable to
configure mailwatch for external mailboxes (imap or imaps).
Thanks
Michel.
k out aprox. I/O's per second for a given drive
performence. Though my current method of hdparm -t /dev/hdc like 10 times
works i'd much prefer to do 35Mb/s SDR = xxI/O per sec.
And one last thing I've got 4 IDE drives, why can I only get stats in gkrellm
for hda & hdb and not hdc & hdd?
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 02:42:51PM +0800, Michael C. Alonzo wrote:
> im using blackbox as my WM. i want gkrellm to load whenever i `startx`
> and i want it (gkrellm) to appear on all virtual desktops. is this
> possible? how?
Put it in the slit:
$ gkrellm -w
That'll do the trick.
"Michael C. Alonzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> im using blackbox as my WM.
_GOOD_ choice there!
> i want gkrellm to load whenever i `startx`
So you want something in your .xinitrc file (if you use startx to get X
going) or .xsession (?) if you have a "grpahica
im using blackbox as my WM. i want gkrellm to load whenever i `startx`
and i want it (gkrellm) to appear on all virtual desktops. is this
possible? how?
TIA
--
"When you have eliminated the impossible,
whatever remains, however improbable,
must be the truth."
--Sherlock H
Craig Dickson wrote:
> Now, why would my CPU be pegged at 100% ever since upgrading to Sawfish
> 1.0.1 in Sid tonight?
Sorry about that, looks like the old Sawfish failed to terminate, and
that was what was using up all the CPU. With that killed, everything's
fine.
HOWEVER -- change of subject h
Now, why would my CPU be pegged at 100% ever since upgrading to Sawfish
1.0.1 in Sid tonight? Anyone have any ideas on how to correct this by
some configuration option (probably not as obvious as "Use All CPU=No"),
or is a downgrade to Sawfish 1.0 the only option? Is anyone else even
seeing this pr
Hi,
I am using testing with gkrellm 1.0.8
Sometimes gkrellm shows 10-20% activity on the cpu, when gtop/top shows none.
Does anybody encountered this?
Ciao!
juh
--
Es lebe die 43 Stundenwoche!
http://www.sudelbuch.de/1999/19991122.html
vester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi glyn...
>
> fetchmail seems to work...i added that line, looked at the log file and
> there it clearly logged the retrieval of my emails. as a result (i am
> using telnet at the moment) your email also disappeared from the inbox i
> was working on...the ema
hi glyn...
fetchmail seems to work...i added that line, looked at the log file and
there it clearly logged the retrieval of my emails. as a result (i am
using telnet at the moment) your email also disappeared from the inbox i
was working on...the email however was not sent to /var/spool/mail/amae
vester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi!
>
> could anybody explain the basics of debian's local mail delivery to me?
> or, to be more precise:
>
> i want to be able to use the gkrellm mail plugin. in order to do that i
> added several pop servers to fetchmail us
hi!
could anybody explain the basics of debian's local mail delivery to me?
or, to be more precise:
i want to be able to use the gkrellm mail plugin. in order to do that i
added several pop servers to fetchmail using fetchmailconf but when i run
fetchmail, nothing happens...i do not really
Hi, this has been an ongoing problem for a long time for me, but I just
wanted to see if others experience the same thing.
I run Gkrellm with Sawfish. I have Gkrellm always started when I login
by Gnome. I have Sawfish set to "Automatically remember other window
attributes". I ha
Hi,
I finally found the great monitor on so many screnshots and find that
whatever theme I use I still have the same basic default green panel
backgrounds (where teh text is). My dl Bluesteel theme had blue panels like
the original, but the rest is green. I read what little there is for FAQ and
ma
I want to run the latest gkrellm from potato. What's the best
way to upgrade libgtk1.2? Can you put woody in sources.list,
upgrade libgtk1.2, then reedit sources.list?
In short, how do you run the latest gkrellm (and thus use the
latest themes) from frozen?
--
David S. Ja
Hi,
Are there any gkrellm version 0.7.5 compatible themes around
anywhere?
Or are there instructions for upgrading potato to woody libs so
version 0.10.4 can run on it?
--
David S. Jackson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
can I
94 matches
Mail list logo
