I want to compile a statically linked version of gedit using the
upstream meson based package.
I've got the sources matching my current Debian 11 system and can do a
build no problem.
What I want to do is statically link the gedit executable. I see the
non-static executable is very
ent de texte ou autre éditeur) va lancer automatiquement le navigateur
(FF, par exemple), qui va apparaître au premier plan.
De même pour un fichier pdf qui va ouvrir Document viewer ou autre visionneuse.
Mais quand j'ouvre un bête fichier texte, il s'ouvre dans gedit tandis que
gedit ne
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:10:34AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 19 apr 20, 04:59:54, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> >
> > I am on Debian testing (bullseye, fully updated ) and have found some
> > oddities [...]
> The hardware has no concept of window decorations, only pixels and what
> colour t
at bottom :-
On 19/04/2020, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 19 apr 20, 04:59:54, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>>
>> I am on Debian testing (bullseye, fully updated ) and have found some
>> oddities . For instance gedit and kate appear smaller but with full
>> window deco
On Du, 19 apr 20, 04:59:54, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>
> I am on Debian testing (bullseye, fully updated ) and have found some
> oddities . For instance gedit and kate appear smaller but with full
> window decorations by which I mean the minimize, maximize and close
> icons on the
Hi all,
I am on Debian testing (bullseye, fully updated ) and have found some
oddities . For instance gedit and kate appear smaller but with full
window decorations by which I mean the minimize, maximize and close
icons on the top left of the application. On the other hand,
featherpad and
ux
> >
> > I update obsessively.
> >
> > Just today, gedit will not start, as user. I logged in (as usual) as
> > user. Gedit will not start from the GUI. It just shows a small rotating
> > symbol indicating an application program trying to start, for about 15
&
Le 13/03/2020 à 05:22, Default User a écrit :
Hey, I have:
Debian Unstable
64-bit
Cinnamon DE
Linux dummy 5.4.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.4.19-1 (2020-02-13) x86_64
GNU/Linux
I update obsessively.
Just today, gedit will not start, as user. I logged in (as usual) as
user. Gedit will not
Hey, I have:
Debian Unstable
64-bit
Cinnamon DE
Linux dummy 5.4.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.4.19-1 (2020-02-13) x86_64
GNU/Linux
I update obsessively.
Just today, gedit will not start, as user. I logged in (as usual) as user.
Gedit will not start from the GUI. It just shows a small rotating
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020, 15:55 Curt wrote:
> On 2020-02-05, Default User wrote:
> >
> > Andrei, thank you for the information about "cream". Unfortunately, I
> just
> > can not "do" modal editing. It just doesn't work for me.
>
> Then keep it turned off.
>
> (Cream does not use Vim's modal editing
On 2020-02-05, Default User wrote:
>
> Andrei, thank you for the information about "cream". Unfortunately, I just
> can not "do" modal editing. It just doesn't work for me.
Then keep it turned off.
(Cream does not use Vim's modal editing unless turned on from the
Preferences menu.)
http://cre
"proper" (it was for me).
>
> Kind regards,
> Andrei
> --
> http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Sorry, I've been away for a few days.
Andrei, thank you for the information about "cream". Unfortunately, I just
can not "do" modal editing. It j
On Mi, 29 ian 20, 09:52:29, Default User wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 02:17 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > If you take suggestions for editors you might as well look into (g)vim,
> > or cream if you find the learning curve too steep.
>
> Andrei, thank you for the suggestions.
>
> I don't know a
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 02:17 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 27 ian 20, 19:16:35, Default User wrote:
> > Okay, I'm stumped.
> >
> > I'm running 64-bit Debian unstable, Cinnamon desktop environment.
> >
> > All I want to do is set the Gedit left margin to
On Lu, 27 ian 20, 19:16:35, Default User wrote:
> Okay, I'm stumped.
>
> I'm running 64-bit Debian unstable, Cinnamon desktop environment.
>
> All I want to do is set the Gedit left margin to 80 characters, so that
> text hard-wraps (or at least soft-wraps)
On Tuesday 28 January 2020 19:57:02 Default User wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 12:18 Curt wrote:
> > On 2020-01-28, Default User wrote:
> > > Okay, I'm stumped.
> > >
> > > I'm running 64-bit Debian unstable, Cinnamon desktop environment.
>
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 12:18 Curt wrote:
> On 2020-01-28, Default User wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I'm stumped.
> >
> > I'm running 64-bit Debian unstable, Cinnamon desktop environment.
> >
> > All I want to do is set the Gedit left margin to 80 characte
On 2020-01-28, Default User wrote:
>
> Okay, I'm stumped.
>
> I'm running 64-bit Debian unstable, Cinnamon desktop environment.
>
> All I want to do is set the Gedit left margin to 80 characters, so that
> text hard-wraps (or at least soft-wraps) at that point.
Do
On Monday 27 January 2020 19:16:35 Default User wrote:
> Okay, I'm stumped.
>
> I'm running 64-bit Debian unstable, Cinnamon desktop environment.
>
> All I want to do is set the Gedit left margin to 80 characters, so
> that text hard-wraps (or at least soft-wraps)
Okay, I'm stumped.
I'm running 64-bit Debian unstable, Cinnamon desktop environment.
All I want to do is set the Gedit left margin to 80 characters, so that
text hard-wraps (or at least soft-wraps) at that point.
Currently, with the word-wrap setting in Gedit selected, an
about) for many years, but still not fixed.
> > The earliest bug record I can find dates back to 2003, so I'm
> > guessing the work around is my best bet for the foreseeable future.
> > :) Either that or address the "problem" on the source side.
>
> The *ge
Curt wrote:
> The *gedit faq* is edifying on the long lines issue (seems like you missed
> reading it in your "research):
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Gedit/FAQ
I was searching for bug reports; I hadn't expected an FAQ to exist on the very
topic I was interested in. Quit
es back to 2003, so I'm guessing the work around is my best bet
> for the foreseeable future. :) Either that or address the "problem" on the
> source side.
>
The *gedit faq* is edifying on the long lines issue (seems like you
missed reading it in your "research):
http
Wayne Hartell wrote:
> I grabbed a 1.5MB text file from Windows (converted using dos2unix,
> not that it appears to make a difference) and tried to open this in gedit
> and it takes about 45 seconds to open the file. That is a whole lot slower
> than I was expecting. To make thin
Wayne Hartell wrote:
> I grabbed a 1.5MB text file from Windows (converted using dos2unix, not
that it appears
> to make a difference) and tried to open this in gedit and it takes about
45 seconds to open
> the file. That is a whole lot slower than I was expecting. To make things
Wayne Hartell wrote:
> I think the file I have simply does not have many line feeds. Is that
> abnormal for Linux perhaps?
You mean such as your reply line above which is a very long line and
pushes off the right side of the screen? More typically it would be
word wrapped to make reading it easi
Linux-Fan wrote:
> In my experience, VIM is slow with long lines (which are automatically
> wrapped and often look strange if the result is too large to fit on a single
> page) and
> syntax highlighting. Using many short lines, VIM has always been good enough
> for me (even with several MiB fil
On 02/01/2015 01:42 PM, Wayne Hartell wrote:
> I grabbed a 1.5MB text file from Windows (converted using dos2unix, not that
> it appears to make a difference) and tried to open this in gedit and it
> takes about 45 seconds to open the file. That is a whole lot slower than I
> was e
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Why did a _text_ file need converting? Or do you not mean .txt?
Yeah just a regular ASCII text file, but as another reply pointed out new
lines are handled slightly differently under Windows vs Unix/Linux. I don't
think that is the problem though.
Cheers,
Wayne.
--
To UNSU
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> Unix text files end lines with , Windows with .
That was the purpose of pre-processing the file with dos2unix. It didn't seem
to help.
I think the file I have simply does not have many line feeds. Is that abnormal
for Linux perhaps?
Wayne.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Sorry, Wayne. :-( This was meant to go to the list. I hope that someone can
> explain the answer!
>
> On Sunday 01 February 2015 12:42:00 Wayne Hartell wrote:
>> I grabbed a 1.5MB text file from Windows (converted using dos2unix, not
>> that i
Sorry, Wayne. :-( This was meant to go to the list. I hope that someone can
explain the answer!
On Sunday 01 February 2015 12:42:00 Wayne Hartell wrote:
> I grabbed a 1.5MB text file from Windows (converted using dos2unix, not
> that it appears to make a difference)
Why did a _text_ file need
Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI said:
> Possibly non-formatted, with one line per paragraph ?
That's what it looks like with line numbers on (very big paragraphs too), but
my question is why would this slow gedit down and is there any way around it?
It seems to present the content as I woul
On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 23:12:00 +1030
"Wayne Hartell" wrote:
> One thing I have noticed under vim is that if I turn on line numbers the
> document is showing as several large chunks of text on a handful of lines,
> as opposed to a large number of short lines. Would this be
I grabbed a 1.5MB text file from Windows (converted using dos2unix, not that
it appears to make a difference) and tried to open this in gedit and it
takes about 45 seconds to open the file. That is a whole lot slower than I
was expecting. To make things worse the performance within gedit is very
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 19:39:41 + (UTC)
"Juan R. de Silva" wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:26:38 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:43:00 + (UTC)
> > "Juan R. de Silva" wrote:
> >
> >
> >> BTW, about "bupsky" script you shared with me... It's very nice
> >> while worki
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:26:38 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:43:00 + (UTC)
> "Juan R. de Silva" wrote:
>
>
>> BTW, about "bupsky" script you shared with me... It's very nice while
>> working with files in console, like using vim, or nano, or anything
>> like this. I do mos
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:43:00 + (UTC)
"Juan R. de Silva" wrote:
> BTW, about "bupsky" script you shared with me... It's very nice while
> working with files in console, like using vim, or nano, or anything
> like this. I do most of my file editing work in GUI editors. So, in
> this case it's
m/archives/xubuntu-users/2014-July/007320.html
>>
>> Though I spent quit a bit of time to figure it out. Well, plus a bit of
>> frustration thinking the file was lost. But... At the end there was a
>> "Happy End." :-)
>>
>> Nevertheless, I did not
plus a bit
> of frustration thinking the file was lost. But... At the end there
> was a "Happy End." :-)
>
> Nevertheless, I did not neither Mousepad nor Leafpad and with some
> help found a very good substitution for both - Pluma a default MATE
> text editor, a fork from
Mousepad nor Leafpad and with some help
found a very good substitution for both - Pluma a default MATE text
editor, a fork from venerable GNOME2 gedit. Looks excellent in XFCE.
Another one I installed and I like it is Geany. But this one is for more
serious work.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:38:14 +0100
José Silva wrote:
> On 15/07/14 23:11, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:00:34 +0100
> > José Silva wrote:
> >
> >> On 15/07/14 21:03, Bret Busby wrote:
> >>> Pluma
> >>>
> >>> Pluma is a text editor which supports most standard editor
> >>> features
On 15/07/14 23:11, Steve Litt wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:00:34 +0100
José Silva wrote:
On 15/07/14 21:03, Bret Busby wrote:
Pluma
Pluma is a text editor which supports most standard editor features.
What's wrong with xfce mousepad?
Just the other day it ate someones whole file. I thin
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:00:34 +0100
José Silva wrote:
> On 15/07/14 21:03, Bret Busby wrote:
> > Pluma
> >
> > Pluma is a text editor which supports most standard editor features.
>
> What's wrong with xfce mousepad?
Just the other day it ate someones whole file. I think that was
reported on thi
On 15/07/14 21:03, Bret Busby wrote:
Pluma
Pluma is a text editor which supports most standard editor features.
What's wrong with xfce mousepad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:34:18 +0400
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:46:07PM +0200, B wrote:
> > When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower
> > gray bars (with controls & information), but no XFCE
> > decoration, especially the clo
was invented [1].
>>> Users thoughts on the matter, are … well, let's sum it up as
>>> 'needs some work' - [2].
>>
>> I think I could suggest another use of the butter for
>> those creeps…
>>
>> Too bad, I loved gedit; any suggestion abo
On 16/07/2014, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 15/07/2014 21:36, Bret Busby a écrit :
>> On 16/07/2014, Reco wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:46:07PM +0200, B wrote:
>>>> When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower
>
On Tue, 7/15/14, B wrote:
Subject: Re: gedit ugly under xfce
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2014, 1:47 PM
Too bad, I loved gedit; any suggestion about quite the
same editor w/o uglyness?
With my wheezy xfce, I use
um it up as
>> 'needs some work' - [2].
>
> I think I could suggest another use of the butter for
> those creeps…
>
> Too bad, I loved gedit; any suggestion about quite the
> same editor w/o uglyness?
Doesn't Mate have a gedit fork?
If you're not averse to
Le 15/07/2014 21:36, Bret Busby a écrit :
> On 16/07/2014, Reco wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:46:07PM +0200, B wrote:
>>> When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower
>>> gray bars (with controls & information), but n
On 16/07/2014, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:46:07PM +0200, B wrote:
>> When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower
>> gray bars (with controls & information), but no XFCE
>> decoration, especially the close/minimize buttons (and
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:49:09 -0500
lostson wrote:
> Geany works quite nice or there is always gvim.
No bad at all, thanks.
--
TooTo: eg: if you put the dog in the microwave, you'll void warranty
Manny: For the dog or for the microwave?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s on the matter, are … well, let's sum it up as
>> 'needs some work' - [2].
>
> I think I could suggest another use of the butter for
> those creeps…
>
> Too bad, I loved gedit; any suggestion about quite the
> same editor w/o uglyness?
>
--
To UNSUBSCR
checked on
a 32bits machine: ze same)
> Upstream sees this misfeature as a best thing since buttered bread
> was invented [1].
> Users thoughts on the matter, are … well, let's sum it up as
> 'needs some work' - [2].
I think I could suggest another use of the butter
Hi.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:46:07PM +0200, B wrote:
> When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower
> gray bars (with controls & information), but no XFCE
> decoration, especially the close/minimize buttons (and
> no upper bar from the theme).
>
> grdest
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:28:58 -0400
Frank McCormick wrote:
PLS don't Cc: me, I'm subscribed to the ML.
--
Confucious say:
man and mouse the same, both end up in pussy.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 07/15/2014 01:46 PM, B wrote:
sid 64bits
XFCE
gedit
==
Hi list,
I'm using
When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower
gray bars (with controls & information), but no XFCE
decoration, especially the close/minimize buttons (and
no upper bar from
sid 64bits
XFCE
gedit
==
Hi list,
I'm using
When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower
gray bars (with controls & information), but no XFCE
decoration, especially the close/minimize buttons (and
no upper bar from the theme).
grdestop has XFCE decoration.
Is
On 9/10/13, Kailash wrote:
> On Thursday 05 September 2013 07:48 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 9/5/13, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>>> * On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>>>> Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
>&
On Thursday 05 September 2013 07:48 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/5/13, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>> * On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>>> Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
>>>>
>>>> (gedit:15593):
On 9/5/13, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> > Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
>> >
>> > (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18:
>> > Not
* On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
> >
> > (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18:
> > Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'.
> >
> Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
>
> (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18:
> Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'.
>
> Evince error:
>
> (evince:15620): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error:
e a while ago, and have
>>> been happy since.
>>
>> I don't like mousepad editor however, and I don't gedit. So I installed
BTW, that should have been "I don't mind gedit"..
>> gedit.
>>
>> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly
.
>
> I find it adequate; ~8months now; I am however reasonable with the command
> line.
>
> I don't like mousepad editor however, and I don't gedit. So I installed gedit.
>
> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
> bar of
Am 01.09.2013 08:22, schrieb Joel Rees:
> 've been looking at geany, and it looks interesting functionally, but
> I'm not at all sold on it. Don't like lots of tool panes all over.
> It's part of the reason I can't quite bring myself to use either
> netbeans or eclipse regularly.
Most of them can
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 11:43 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> Hmm. I think I have seen that kind of thing once, some years ago, but
> not recently. I think it was with a less stable version of LXDE
> (running a Fedora security tools live USB).
I've seen it before too, but don't remember the reason for thi
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 02:02 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> http://upmart.org/gedit-menus-example.jpg
That's really odd :(. When using gedit on Xfce (different distros,
including Ubuntu/Debian) it's ok on my machine. I agree there seems to
be some lib(s) missing. Xfce was and for
; better job for GTK + Qt apps than GNOME did and Mate does. For GNOME and
>>>> Mate Qt apps were/are an issue. Perhaps the space between the menus is
>>>> less wide, than it is using GNOME and I'm simply used to it, but at
>>>> least there is a little bit spa
;> Mate Qt apps were/are an issue. Perhaps the space between the menus is
>>> less wide, than it is using GNOME and I'm simply used to it, but at
>>> least there is a little bit space between the drop down menu titles in
>>> the menu bar of GNOME apps, such as gedit
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
>>> bar of gedit (and I've seen it
On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
>> bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are
>> jammed up against each
On 09/01/2013 02:22 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
...
>
> I've been looking at geany, and it looks interesting functionally, but
> I'm not at all sold on it. Don't like lots of tool panes all over.
> It's part of the reason I can't quite bring myself to use either
> netbeans or eclipse regularly.
>
...
A
.
>
> I find it adequate; ~8months now; I am however reasonable with the
> command line.
>
> I don't like mousepad editor however, and I don't gedit. So I
> installed gedit.
>
> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
> bar
> I find it adequate; ~8months now; I am however reasonable with the command
> line.
>
> I don't like mousepad editor however, and I don't gedit. So I installed gedit.
I think, but I am not sure, that mousepad is in there because it is
small and doesn't have a lot of
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
> bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are
> jammed up against each other - no nice spacing between them. Anyone
>
line.
I don't like mousepad editor however, and I don't gedit. So I installed gedit.
But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are
jammed up against each other - no nice spacing between them
I have been floundering around the web looking for whatever plugin or
plugin(s) are needed to make GEdit useful as an editor, say, with
mutt. I thought this info would have leapt off the screen at me, but
here I am asking my patient deb-user friends yet another OT question!
What I expect mostly
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 16:29 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:16:01 -0500, John W Foster wrote:
>
> > I've used gedit as my quick editor for some time on my Debian 'stable'
> > production server. Primarily for a quick revising of mediawiki article
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:16:01 -0500, John W Foster wrote:
> I've used gedit as my quick editor for some time on my Debian 'stable'
> production server. Primarily for a quick revising of mediawiki articles.
> I use the find and replace feature a LOT! Recently after some upgr
I've used gedit as my quick editor for some time on my Debian 'stable'
production server. Primarily for a quick revising of mediawiki articles.
I use the find and replace feature a LOT! Recently after some upgrades
that feature does not work properly. i.e. if I click on the drop do
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:43:20 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>> I have a menu item, 'sudo gedit', which has worked for years but just
>> stopped working (on a current testing system). . . .
>
> Sorry to answer my own question - 'gksudo gedit' works (althou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/30/2010 04:37 PM, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> I have a menu item, 'sudo gedit', which has worked for years but just
> stopped working (on a current testing system). Running from the
> command line, I get:
>
> No proto
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> I have a menu item, 'sudo gedit', which has worked for years but just
> stopped working (on a current testing system). Running from the
> command line, I get:
>
> No protocol specified
>
> (gedit:3008
I have a menu item, 'sudo gedit', which has worked for years but just
stopped working (on a current testing system). Running from the
command line, I get:
No protocol specified
(gedit:30084): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0
as I do when I try to run gedit in a root termina
files
> are from the pendrive anymore, so why does it keep locking?
>
> No, i haven't tried the -i or any other workaround, since i'd like it
> to Just Work... ;) Any suggestions?
>
> TIA,
> Nuno Magalhães
Most likely, gedit's current working directory is still
Nuno Magalhães wrote:
Could you show us the command you are using to 'eject' the pendrive.
Sorry, "none". I use thunar-volman, it mounts and umounts my removable
media. I just right-click the drive icon in any file browser window
and choose "unmout".
Please use the Debian-user list for repli
On 2009-09-08 12:01, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 17:57, Tim Tebbit wrote:
If you are ejecting from a shell, make sure you have left the pendrives
directory. ie 'cd ~/; eject /dev/sdb*'
I know, thanks; i'm using the GUI (thunar file manager). I've
dist-upgraded this morning. Af
09/08/2009 07:57 PM, Tim Tebbit:
'cd ~/; eject /dev/sdb*'
Just 'cd' is enough.
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
+261 34 29 155 34
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@li
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 17:57, Tim Tebbit wrote:
> If you are ejecting from a shell, make sure you have left the pendrives
> directory. ie 'cd ~/; eject /dev/sdb*'
I know, thanks; i'm using the GUI (thunar file manager). I've
dist-upgraded this morning. After two quick tests (just read a file;
and
Nuno Magalhães wrote:
Greetings.
If i open a txt from my pendrive, then close it, then try to eject,
i'll get the "an app is using it" message. None of gedit's open files
are from the pendrive anymore, so why does it keep locking?
No, i haven't tried the -i or any other workaround, since i'd li
Nuno Magalhães wrote:
Greetings.
If i open a txt from my pendrive, then close it, then try to eject,
i'll get the "an app is using it" message. None of gedit's open files
are from the pendrive anymore, so why does it keep locking?
Could you show us the command you are using to 'eject' the pen
Greetings.
If i open a txt from my pendrive, then close it, then try to eject,
i'll get the "an app is using it" message. None of gedit's open files
are from the pendrive anymore, so why does it keep locking?
No, i haven't tried the -i or any other workaround, since i'd like it
to Just Work... ;)
How can I enter as ANSI escape sequence in GEDIT?
--
John Salmon
salmo...@comcast.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Also, running Gedit with sudo works fine.
--
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Michael Pobega [2009-03-02 04:02:38 -0500]:
>
> Try running it with sux or gksu rather than just plain su; that should
> pass X privileges to any account you switch to
>
Hmm, it seems gksu is being used with Synaptic, but why the error when
calling Gnome's system log monitor? I get a root
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 01:23:15PM +0700, Dave Patterson wrote:
> Hello *
>
> Recently I've been getting an error I've not seen before in Gnome: when
> I run Gedit from a terminal as su, I get the following:
>
> Failed to contact configuration server; some possible c
Hello *
Recently I've been getting an error I've not seen before in Gnome: when
I run Gedit from a terminal as su, I get the following:
Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that
you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS
lock
On 04/27/2008 10:07 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> I want to set at my pleasure the page margins when printing a document edited
>> with gedit, but apparently this seems not be possible. Is there anyone who
>> has any experience with problem?
"Mumia W.." <[EMAIL
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
