Re: gdm / gdm3

2011-10-10 Thread Walter Hurry
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:52:14 +, Camaleón wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:25:47 +0300, Victor Nitu wrote: > >> Hello all! > > Hi! > > I'm creating a new thread because you have replied to a current one > ("Re: > a quick Q:about package") and thus hijacking it ;-) > >> I just have caught an

Re: gdm / gdm3

2011-10-10 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:25:47 +0300, Victor Nitu wrote: > Hello all! Hi! I'm creating a new thread because you have replied to a current one ("Re: a quick Q:about package") and thus hijacking it ;-) > I just have caught an interesting observation on the gdm3 package. I > have two systems, both

gdm / gdm3

2011-10-10 Thread Victor Nitu
Hello all! I just have caught an interesting observation on the gdm3 package. I have two systems, both of them are vanilla Debian testing, installed in different time frames. In fact, there are about 7-8 months between them. Both have all packages up-to-date, but yesterday I noticed a small differ