On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 14:50:43 -0800, G. Crimp wrote:
> The egcs versions of gcc and g++ are not both yet ready for prime
> time. I may get corrected on this,
Indeed.
> but I think it is gcc that still has some bugs,
Wrong. To quote /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian:
:- FSF gcc 2.7.2.x provide
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 04:54:19PM -0500, fantumn Steven Baker" wrote:
Hi Steve,
Glad to see you are still amongst the ranks of Debian users. I am
not the most knowledgable person on this subject, but when I say the name
fantumn, I couldn't resist answering. You might get a better answe
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, fantumn (Steven Baker) wrote:
> > First, was wondering _what_ the differences between gcc and egcs were.
> It is mostly a matter of version
Somewhere in /usr/doc/gcc (sorry, don't remember exactly where) I
found a recommendation
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 11:16:32 +0100, Conrado Badenas wrote:
> What "egcs" means?
It used to mean Experimental GCC Compiler Suite, though AFAIK it's not
expanded anywhere on the EGCS website (http://egcs.cygnus.com) anymore.
> If both gcc and egcs are developed by GNU, why they are missynchroni
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Debian uses eg++ for our g++ because 2.7 is effectively useless (it
> encourages code that will not work on other C++ compilers) and we use 2.7
> for our gcc because nobody has patched the 2.0 kernels to work with
> another gcc. Effectively 2.7.* is dead and all development
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 02:49:17PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:58:29 -0700 (MST), Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> > >for our gcc because nobody has patched the 2.0 kernels to work with
> > >another gcc.
>
> > Do the 2.2 kern
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 02:49:17PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:58:29 -0700 (MST), Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >for our gcc because nobody has patched the 2.0 kernels to work with
> >another gcc.
> Do the 2.2 kernels compile with egcs?
As of somewhere in the 2.1 series Linu
binWATVpeuW5K.bin
Description: Binary data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:58:29 -0700 (MST), Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>for our gcc because nobody has patched the 2.0 kernels to work with
>another gcc.
Do the 2.2 kernels compile with egcs?
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, fantumn (Steven Baker) wrote:
> Okay, I don't want to start a holy war or anything here, but I have some
> questions about egcs and gcc.
>
> First, was wondering _what_ the differences between gcc and egcs were.
It is mostly a matter of version
gcc 2.7.* has been used for
Okay, I don't want to start a holy war or anything here, but I have some
questions about egcs and gcc.
First, was wondering _what_ the differences between gcc and egcs were.
(Note: when I say gcc, I mean gcc _and_ g++)
Compatibility: First, can egcs compile everything that gcc can? IE: kernel?
11 matches
Mail list logo
