Re: gcc 3.3 in unstable/testing

2003-06-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 08:09:43AM +0100, James Stone wrote: > Just a quick question: why is the default gcc 3.3 in unstable/testing > when the only one that seems to work for compiling stuff (at least on > my system) is gcc 3.2.3? Works fine for me, although we're having to fix u

gcc 3.3 in unstable/testing

2003-06-04 Thread James Stone
Just a quick question: why is the default gcc 3.3 in unstable/testing when the only one that seems to work for compiling stuff (at least on my system) is gcc 3.2.3? James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]