Victor Sudakov writes:
> I summed up with awk the values of %mem, which are supposed to be "ratio
> of the process's resident set size to the physical memory", correct?
>
> In my understanding, the value of %mem should indicate how much physical
> memory is spent on the "individual" part of the
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > Those are kind of virtual things, as far as I understand. If not %mem, then
> > what `ps` parameter can show me how many php-fpm workers I can safely start
> > before RAM is exhausted?
>
> This is a seemingly easy question with a surprisingly difficult answer.
>
> I
Klaus Singvogel wrote:
> Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > > Perhaps because the php-fpm workers were forked from the same parent
> > > and so a lot of theie 'physical' RAM is actually the same RAM as each
> > > other, because it's not been modified?
> >
> > I see your point, but ps(1) talks about real ph
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > Perhaps because the php-fpm workers were forked from the same parent
> > and so a lot of theie 'physical' RAM is actually the same RAM as each
> > other, because it's not been modified?
>
> I see your point, but ps(1) talks about real physical RAM:
>
> %mem%MEM
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:19:17PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
[...]
> Those are kind of virtual things, as far as I understand. If not %mem, then
> what `ps` parameter can show me how many php-fpm workers I can safely start
> before RAM is exhausted?
This is a seemingly easy question with a su
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:24:35AM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > Dear Colleagues,
> >
> > Could you please clarify for me how the following is possible. `ps` shows
> > that the php-fpm workers have occupied 62% of physical memory, while
> > `free` shows that only 1.3Gi
Tixy wrote:
> >
> > Could you please clarify for me how the following is possible. `ps` shows
> > that the php-fpm workers have occupied 62% of physical memory, while
> > `free` shows that only 1.3Gi (which is 17% of total RAM) is used:
> >
> > $ ps axww -o cmd,%mem |awk '/php-fpm/{sum+=$NF}END{p
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:24:35AM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Could you please clarify for me how the following is possible. `ps` shows
> that the php-fpm workers have occupied 62% of physical memory, while
> `free` shows that only 1.3Gi (which is 17% of total RAM) is used
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 10:24 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Could you please clarify for me how the following is possible. `ps` shows
> that the php-fpm workers have occupied 62% of physical memory, while
> `free` shows that only 1.3Gi (which is 17% of total RAM) is used:
>
>
Dear Colleagues,
Could you please clarify for me how the following is possible. `ps` shows
that the php-fpm workers have occupied 62% of physical memory, while
`free` shows that only 1.3Gi (which is 17% of total RAM) is used:
$ ps axww -o cmd,%mem |awk '/php-fpm/{sum+=$NF}END{print sum}'
62.1
$ f
My Debian 10 (buster) server swaps (it became indeed very slow)
while there is still much free memory:
joooj:~> free
totalusedfree shared buff/cache available
Mem: 489260 2162527704 24 265304 257188
Swap:360
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:09:13 +0100
Marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is my memory statistics:
> 1295184k total, 664740k used, 630444k free,85144k buffers
> and every day my free memory decrease.
Normally, this is a good thing, since "free" memory is unuse
Karl O. Pinc ha scritto:
On 01/11/2006 03:30:07 PM, Marco wrote:
Every day my free memory decrease and I don't understand why...
BTW, you want your free memory to decrease becase memory
is no good unless it's used. If it's not used for anything
else the OS uses it for dis
On 01/11/2006 03:30:07 PM, Marco wrote:
Every day my free memory decrease and I don't understand why...
BTW, you want your free memory to decrease becase memory
is no good unless it's used. If it's not used for anything
else the OS uses it for disk buffers.
See also vmstat
Joris Huizer ha scritto:
Marco wrote:
Hi all,
How to check the memory used from a task?
With "top" I look only total memory, free memory and used memory.
Every day my free memory decrease and I don't understand why...
Help :-(
Thanks
Marco
Top should tell you the m
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:50:07 +0100
Marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joris Huizer ha scritto:
> > Marco wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> How to check the memory used from a task?
> >>
> >> With "top" I look only total memory, free memory and u
Joris Huizer ha scritto:
Marco wrote:
Hi all,
How to check the memory used from a task?
With "top" I look only total memory, free memory and used memory.
Every day my free memory decrease and I don't understand why...
Help :-(
Thanks
Marco
Top should tell you the m
Marco wrote:
Hi all,
How to check the memory used from a task?
With "top" I look only total memory, free memory and used memory.
Every day my free memory decrease and I don't understand why...
Help :-(
Thanks
Marco
Top should tell you the meemory per task - start t
Hi all,
How to check the memory used from a task?
With "top" I look only total memory, free memory and used memory.
Every day my free memory decrease and I don't understand why...
Help :-(
Thanks
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:27:23AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
|
| Right. Just seems funny to not include that somewhere. I can get the total
| from here:
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] msoulier]$ dmesg | grep RAM
| RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size
If you look at some of
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 05:46:28PM +0100, Hans Marcus Kruger wrote:
> On Sunday 21 January 2001 17:27, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
> but the size of /proc/kcore should be exaclty as big as your memory
> ls -l /proc/kcore
Yup, that looks good. Thanks.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL
On Sunday 21 January 2001 17:27, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
but the size of /proc/kcore should be exaclty as big as your memory
ls -l /proc/kcore
hmk
> > Right. Just seems funny to not include that somewhere. I can get the
> total from here:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] msoulier]$ dmesg | grep RAM
>
Right. Just seems funny to not include that somewhere. I can get the total
from here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] msoulier]$ dmesg | grep RAM
RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size
But I just would have figured that total would mean total. ;-) No biggy.
Mike
On Sun, Jan 21,
I think the memory the kernel occupies is not counted against the total,
since it is not available to any other program. So your total memory is
physical memory - kernel memory usage = total available memory
Diego Biurrun
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 10:44:02AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
Hey guys. If I do a free on my gateway, I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] msoulier]$ free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 14308 13680628 1468 2428 7068
-/+ buffers/cache: 4184 10124
Swap:96764
25 matches
Mail list logo
