to...@tuxteam.de (12019-05-25):
> That means that to send SIGILL to pid 1 you most probably gotta be
> root (systemd or not). And then, there are more classy ways to bring
> your system down anyway.
>
> Folks, please double-check that stuff before reposting. I don't want
> the Debian mailing list
On 2019-05-25, wrote:
>
> Folks, please double-check that stuff before reposting. I don't want
> the Debian mailing list to become Fakebook or Twitter.
>
Or Der Spiegel.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2019/01/der-spiegal-fabrication-scandal-global/579889/
--
“Decisions are
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 02:01:35PM -0700, Fred wrote:
> Hello,
> I subscribe to the Devuan Linux mailing list. This posting just
> arrived and it appears quite important to Debian.
[about sending SIGILL to systemd]
This is most probably fake news.
You have to have appropriate permi
Jonas Hedman wrote:
> On 19-02-28 11:53, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Jonas Hedman wrote:
> >
> > from the frequently useful archlinux wiki:
> >
> >
> > ! Xresources file
> >
> > URxvt*inheritPixmap: true
> > URxvt*transparent: true
> > ! URxvt*shading: 0 to 99 darkens, 101 to 200 lightens
> > U
On 19-02-28 11:53, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Jonas Hedman wrote:
>
> from the frequently useful archlinux wiki:
>
>
> ! Xresources file
>
> URxvt*inheritPixmap: true
> URxvt*transparent: true
> ! URxvt*shading: 0 to 99 darkens, 101 to 200 lightens
> URxvt*shading: 110
>
> Using the URxvt*backgr
Jonas Hedman wrote:
> Just a small update on this problem.
>
> On my laptop, if I comment the line
> URxvt*tintColor: green
> in my .Xresources and run xrdb ~/.Xresources then the transparency works
> if and only if the shading is set to 100. Any value gives me a white bg.
>
> This tells me
Just a small update on this problem.
On my laptop, if I comment the line
URxvt*tintColor: green
in my .Xresources and run xrdb ~/.Xresources then the transparency works
if and only if the shading is set to 100. Any value gives me a white bg.
This tells me nothing but someone more knowledgabl
://ctkarch.org/documentation/tutorials/tuto.php?page=urxvt-transpa.xml
Urxvt offers two types of transparency for its background:
- A "fake" transparency, that copies the wallpaper to the
background of the terminal. (more exactly, the contents of Xorg's
root window
On 02/26/2019, Jonas Hedman wrote:
Hi debian-user list
I have a kind of weird problem. I'm trying to get fake transparency to
work in urxvt on my x200.
I have two computers. I think they are pretty much identically configured
with respect to installed packages, configuration files et
Hi debian-user list
I have a kind of weird problem. I'm trying to get fake transparency to
work in urxvt on my x200.
I have two computers. I think they are pretty much identically configured
with respect to installed packages, configuration files etc (on debian
stable). The only thing obvi
>So my question: If I don't want to use the BIOS's Fake RAID, and want
>to
>use only the Linux kernel's software RAID, do I want to turn RAID off
>in
>the BIOS
Yes.
Also, always prefer dmraid over some fake RAID.
-nik
re information.
followed by these instructions:
Use the following method only if you want to have a dual-boot system with
> Debian and the other operating system on the same Serial ATA RAID:
> Set up your fake RAID in the BIOS (see owners manual).
I don't want a dual-boot setup.
Le 16.02.2014 13:10, Ralf Mardorf a écrit :
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 16:01 +0400, Reco wrote:
So, the only way that I see is to make a fake package
called libgstreamer0.10-0 with highest version possible (-1
should do).
My first mail didn't came through the list until now.
I'm
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 16:01 +0400, Reco wrote:
> So, the only way that I see is to make a fake package
> called libgstreamer0.10-0 with highest version possible (-1
> should do).
My first mail didn't came through the list until now.
I'm using the date for the version.
Hi.
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:23:57 +0100
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Provides: libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0, libgstreamer0.10-0
This is the source of your problem.
If some package depends on libgstreamer0.10-0 without version specified
- your fake package will work instead o
I am doing some experiments on packages that I think I do not really
needs ( and which depends themselves on tons of crap ) but on which
various tools have hard dependencies. Like gstreamer ( Which I have
purged with dpkg --force-all, and tried my applications. If there is a
problem, I did not
On Sb, 17 aug 13, 19:42:19, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 04:36:03PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> > Doing apt-get --purge remove
> > doesn't work in these situations.
>
> Oops, I actually meant to say apt-get --purge autoremove, not remove.
It seems this hasn't been addressed: l
On 8/18/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 16:36 -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:10:52PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
>> > fulfilled. I already searched for
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 00:37 +0100, "Karl E. Jørgensen" wrote:
> Are you implying that pulseaudio is badly designed? Just
> curios; I have no intention of re-igniting the pulseaudio debates I've
> seen on the mailing lists and forums in the past...
Without discussing the source code, the way pulse
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 16:36 -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:10:52PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
> > fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to this
> > s
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 04:36:03PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> Doing apt-get --purge remove
> doesn't work in these situations.
Oops, I actually meant to say apt-get --purge autoremove, not remove.
Greg
--
web site: http://www.gregn.net
gpg public key: http://www.gregn.net/pubkey.asc
skype:
Gregory Nowak writes:
> For example, installing linux-image-686-pae also installs
> linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae.
Which implies that linux-image-686-pae depends on
linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae.
> However, removing linux-image-686-pae doesn't also remove
> linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae.
Why should it
Hi
On 17/08/13 18:42, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 17:40 +0100, "Karl E. Jørgensen" wrote:
>> Technically, a dummy package is never "needed"
> Hi Karl,
>
> I disagree, in the past years I build a pulseaudio package because it
> was neede
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:10:52PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
> fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to this
> subject, but had no success.
>
> Am I mistake, is a dummy packa
an inconsistent
system, since it doesn't fake a fulfilled dependency, but just allows to
install a package without a dependency.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 17:40 +0100, "Karl E. Jørgensen" wrote:
> Technically, a dummy package is never "needed"
Hi Karl,
I disagree, in the past years I build a pulseaudio package because it
was needed. Now I need to fake that pulseaudio and gvfs are installed,
because D
Dom writes:
> I'm not sure if there is anything that can directly bypass
> dependencies.
"dpkg --force-depends " will. Don't use it.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On 17/08/13 17:10, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hi :)
IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to this
subject, but had no success.
Am I mistake, is a dummy package needed?
I'm not sure if there is any
Hi
On 17/08/13 17:10, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
> fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to this
> subject, but had no success.
>
> Am I mistake, is a dummy package needed?
On 2013-08-17 18:10 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
> fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to this
> subject, but had no success.
With dpkg you can --force-depends, but then apt will not be h
Hi :)
IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to this
subject, but had no success.
Am I mistake, is a dummy package needed?
Regards,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debia
--- On Tue, 4/10/12, T Elcor wrote:
> Any ideas why I'm getting these errors while trying to
> compile F3 flash memory test program? The source is at:
> http://oss.digirati.com.br/f3/
That was a useful program indeed. The moral of the story: beware of fake flash
memory cards
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Mike Viau wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:48:48 -0500 wrote:
>> >>On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Mike V. wrote:
>> >> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:10:55 -0500
>> >>
>> >> I am trying to re-setup my fake-rai
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:48:48 -0500 wrote:
> >>On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Mike V. wrote:
> >> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:10:55 -0500
> >>
> >> I am trying to re-setup my fake-raid (RAID1) volume with L
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Mike Viau wrote:
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:10:55 -0500
>>
>> I am trying to re-setup my fake-raid (RAID1) volume with LVM2 like setup
>> previously. I had been using dmraid on a Lenny insta
So it looks like I can not even access the md device the system created on
boot.
Does anyone have a guide or tips to migrating from the older dmraid to mdadm
for fake-raid?
fdisk -uc /dev/md127 (showing the block device is inaccessible)
Unable to read /dev/md127
dmesg (pieces of dmesg
Hello,
I am trying to re-setup my fake-raid (RAID1) volume with LVM2 like setup
previously. I had been using dmraid on a Lenny installation which gave me (from
memory) a block device like /dev/mapper/isw_xxx_ and also a
/dev/One1TB, but have discovered that the mdadm has replaced the
> So is the problem caused by the fact windows does not support soft raid
> 1 well?
Windows does softraid1 fine, it just doesn't do it the same as Linux. ie.
Windows won't mount a softraid made in Linux and Linux won't mount a
softraid made in Windows.
Stephen Liu wrote:
--- Mark Allums wrote:
- snip -
Only certain editions of Windows can boot from soft raid, and none of
the consumer versions. Just the server/enterprise ones.
One can use fake/soft raid with cheap add-in cards, like the stuff
Highpoint does with their low-end cards
--- Mark Allums wrote:
- snip -
> Only certain editions of Windows can boot from soft raid, and none of
>
> the consumer versions. Just the server/enterprise ones.
>
> One can use fake/soft raid with cheap add-in cards, like the stuff
> Highpoint does with their l
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 04:27:41PM -0400, Justin wrote:
> I have 4 hard disk, 2x320 in raid0 for the OS and 2x1TB in raid1 for
> storage. On the raid0 I dualboot Windows and Fedora. The motherboard's
> fakeraid is excellent because it provides a common interface between Windows
> and Fedora. For th
2009/4/26 Justin :
>> We had a boarder who used fake-raid in the fashion you mention and
>> was bitten badly by a raid chip failure. No spare motherboard, no
>> backups, everything gone.
>>
>> Adrian
>
> Of course, I'm well aware of the drawbacks to fakera
e server/enterprise ones.
One can use fake/soft raid with cheap add-in cards, like the stuff
Highpoint does with their low-end cards. The advantage is, if your
motherboard fails, you can transfer the card to a new motherboard.
Since the cards are relatively cheap, you can get more than one, an
d Fedora. For the raid0, I probably could have used full softraid on both
> OSes. (assuming Windows can boot from a soft raid0?) However, for the raid1,
> where both OSes need to be able to read the same partition, fakeraid was the
> only option.
>
> [Justin Newman]
When your motherb
>
> > > Is
> > > there any advantage compared with software raid?
> > >
> >
> > I only see disadvantages.
>
> Thanks, I appreciate your advice.
Here's the advantage to fakeraid to me. Keep in mind it won't apply to most
people.
I have 4 hard disk, 2x320 in raid0 for the OS and 2x1TB in raid1 f
that most of the on chip raid controllers are fake raid
>> >and the debian community seems to advise using software raid in debian.
>>
>> It allows lesser operating systems to boot from software RAID-1 (and I
>> think RAID-0).
>
>So this seems to be a downside of
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 08:14:12PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Zhengquan Zhang wrote:
> > Dear debian community,
> >
> > Now I figured that most of the on chip raid controllers are fake raid
> > and the debian community seems to advise using software raid in d
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 06:22:43PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <20090424225855.ga...@m364d1.ece.northwestern.edu>, Zhengquan Zhang
> wrote:
> >Now I figured that most of the on chip raid controllers are fake raid
> >and the debian community seems to advis
In <20090424225855.ga...@m364d1.ece.northwestern.edu>, Zhengquan Zhang
wrote:
>Now I figured that most of the on chip raid controllers are fake raid
>and the debian community seems to advise using software raid in debian.
It allows lesser operating systems to boot from software R
Zhengquan Zhang wrote:
> Dear debian community,
>
> Now I figured that most of the on chip raid controllers are fake raid
> and the debian community seems to advise using software raid in debian.
>
> I wonder why they include such fake raid controllers on motherboard.
It is chea
Dear debian community,
Now I figured that most of the on chip raid controllers are fake raid
and the debian community seems to advise using software raid in debian.
I wonder why they include such fake raid controllers on motherboard. Is
there any advantage compared with software raid?
Thanks
"A. F. Cano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I needed a PCI ethernet card for an old P3 system and so I did some
> research to make sure it was supported and got the first
> one that showed up on an ebay search. At least it was cheap. The
> sellers all claim that they were RealTek (RTL8139
> Subject: Re: PCI ethernet card from ebay doesn't work at all. Possibly fake,
> but which?
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Sunday, November 30, 2008, 3:01 AM
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:47:12 -0500, A. F. Cano wrote:
>
> > Any hints will be greatly
> &
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:47:12 -0500, A. F. Cano wrote:
> Any hints will be greatly
> appreciated. Thanks.
>
> A.
I once had troubles like this -- it turned out that the firewire port on
my graphics card was being recognised as eth0.
-- hendrik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:48:44PM -0600, lee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:47:12PM -0500, A. F. Cano wrote:
>
> > SIOCSIFADDR: No such device
> > eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
> > SIOCSIFNETMASK: No such device
> > SIOCSIFBRDADDR: No such device
> > eth0: ERROR w
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 09:48:25AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri,28.Nov.08, 23:47:12, A. F. Cano wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > and lspci -v says this:
> >
> > 00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> > RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
>
> [...]
>
> > The drivers the sys
On Fri,28.Nov.08, 23:47:12, A. F. Cano wrote:
[...]
> and lspci -v says this:
>
> 00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
[...]
> The drivers the system loads automatically (8139cp and 8139too) generate
> no errors, but doing ifup eth0 (
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:47:12PM -0500, A. F. Cano wrote:
> SIOCSIFADDR: No such device
> eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
> SIOCSIFNETMASK: No such device
> SIOCSIFBRDADDR: No such device
> eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
> eth0: ERROR while ge
Hi,
I needed a PCI ethernet card for an old P3 system and so I did some
research to make sure it was supported and got the first
one that showed up on an ebay search. At least it was cheap. The
sellers all claim that they were RealTek (RTL8139D) and they are
detected as such. This is what lshw
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:00:45AM +0200, T wrote:
> Hi
>
> I remember there is a tool that allows me to build a fake package which
> contains nothing but package info to satisfy dependencies from other
> packages. What it is?
>
> For example, I never use package Y, b
Hi
I remember there is a tool that allows me to build a fake package which
contains nothing but package info to satisfy dependencies from other
packages. What it is?
For example, I never use package Y, but (stupid) package X insists on the
dependencies of Y. I want to build a fake Y just to
Fábio Dias wrote:
>
>
>the bios manager only let me create and destroy full size RAID arrays
>(i think, I don't remeber exactly if the size can be changed, but I
>don't think so). I made the partitions during win2k installation...
>
>
>
Then you've got hardware raid, some linux devs call these t
Fábio Dias wrote:
I googled this a lot before mailing the list. There is a lot of
information about hardware raid, and md software RAID. But are only a
few links (ubuntu) about these fake raids chipsets. By the way, here
go THE dummy question: tldp??
The Linux Documentation Project: http
nformation about hardware raid, and md software RAID. But are only a
few links (ubuntu) about these fake raids chipsets. By the way, here
go THE dummy question: tldp??
Thanks again,
Fábio
Fábio Dias wrote:
>I tried. My partitions where already made during win2k installation (I
>think I forgot to tell I'm trying to make a dual boot config.). The
>raid manager on the installer doesn't recognize them. Should I install
>linux before windows??
>
>
I've never done a dual boot raid conf
Wow, first, thanks for the quick answer!
> You can create RAID arrays in woody installer, I've done it on the same
> chipset
I tried. My partitions where already made during win2k installation (I
think I forgot to tell I'm trying to make a dual boot config.). The
raid manager on the installer doe
erything is OK, but any
>linux installation see these disks as one. All seems two independent
>unused disks.
>
>I read something about dmraid tool, and cross installing of debian
>(appendix of installation man). Does not sound so tricky, but I don't
>know how to make a cross install
these disks as one. All seems two independent
unused disks.
I read something about dmraid tool, and cross installing of debian
(appendix of installation man). Does not sound so tricky, but I don't
know how to make a cross install on this fake raid system. I don't
know if it will work w
roach wrote:
On Monday 10 October 2005 17:02, derek wrote:
i just took an old keyboard apart. the green board was quite small,
about 2 inches by 3 inches.
<...>
I was going to mention that possability - you beat me to it. :-)
Another suggestion:
- Mount to keyboards PCB behind an unused fl
On Monday 10 October 2005 17:02, derek wrote:
> i just took an old keyboard apart. the green board was quite small,
> about 2 inches by 3 inches.
<...>
I was going to mention that possability - you beat me to it. :-)
Another suggestion:
- Mount to keyboards PCB behind an unused floppy bay blanki
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 10:36:55AM -0400, George J. (Andy) Anderson wrote:
> Does anyone know it there is a (simple) way to "emulate" a keyboard?
> I've seen some commercial solutions but they are relatively expensive
> (more than $25). I suspect a cheap KVM switch would do the trick, but
> that w
Kent West wrote:
Andy Anderson writes:
Any ideas?
Just give up and plug in an old junker keyboard.
I've got one that will boot with no keyboard but insists that it must
have
a mouse.
Nnot quite elegant, but you might try plugging in a keyboard just long
enough to get past the POST, then
Christopher Pharo Glæserud wrote:
George J. (Andy) Anderson,
Does anyone know it there is a (simple) way to "emulate" a keyboard?
What does it do if you plug a mouse in the keyboard port?
I don't know - I didn't think of trying that. I'll try it just to
see what happens when I get a ch
Joe Smith writes:
> I cannot imagine that that bios needs a mouse for its cmos setup program.
It doesn't. Nonetheless, it halts with a "No Pointing Device" error (or
similar). It's an Aptiva A40. I just let it have its mousie.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
"John Hasler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Smith writes:
Now that is bizare. Not even windows insists that.
Nothing to do with the OS: it's the BIOS (too old to be writeable).
I know that it would be the BIOS. But this is idiotic as no reasonable
operati
Joe Smith wrote:
>
> "John Hasler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Andy Anderson writes:
>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Just give up and plug in an old junker keyboard.
>>
>> I've got one that will boot with no keyboard but insists that it must
>> have
>> a mouse.
>
> N
I wrote:
> I've got one that will boot with no keyboard but insists that it must have
> a mouse.
Joe Smith writes:
> Now that is bizare. Not even windows insists that.
Nothing to do with the OS: it's the BIOS (too old to be writeable).
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
"John Hasler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Anderson writes:
Any ideas?
Just give up and plug in an old junker keyboard.
I've got one that will boot with no keyboard but insists that it must have
a mouse.
Now that is bizare. Not even windows insists that. T
George J. (Andy) Anderson,
> Does anyone know it there is a (simple) way to "emulate" a keyboard?
What does it do if you plug a mouse in the keyboard port?
--
regards,
Christopher Pharo Glæserud
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Andy Anderson writes:
> Any ideas?
Just give up and plug in an old junker keyboard.
I've got one that will boot with no keyboard but insists that it must have
a mouse.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
I have an old PC (600 MHz P3 with 384Mb RAM, 160Gb IDE, and DVD+-R/RW)
running Sarge. It works great as a backup server, and I'm planning to
add Samba so that it can share some disk space with some WinXP PCs. I'd
like to use it headless - no monitor, keyboard or mouse. However, it
won't boot wi
Symantec AntiVirus a détecté un virus dans une pièce jointe que vous ([EMAIL
PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) avez envoyée à MOSTOWSKI Nathalie.
Pour garantir que les destinataires pourront utiliser les fichiers envoyés, lancez une
analyse des virus sur votre ordinateur, nettoyez les fichiers inf
Cher Tiscalinaute,
L'adresse à partir de laquelle vous nous écrivez ne nous permet pas de vous identifier.
Il vous suffit d'utiliser votre boîte aux lettres Tiscali pour nous réitérer votre
demande. Vous pouvez y accéder sur le lien
http://login.tiscali.fr/default.php
Si toute fois vous étiez d
Hello --
Thanks for writing in to the Math Forum! This automatic response
confirms that we've received your message.
At the bottom of this note, please find a few questions that people
commonly send to the Forum, along with our standard responses.
We sincerely hope that you find the answer to
unsubscribe remove
Attention humans, this address does not exist.
If you are a human please go to the site to find our correct contact information.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[English version follows Dutch text]
DIT IS EEN GEAUTOMATISEERD ANTWOORD
Dank u voor het inlichten van <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Wij bevestigen hierbij
dat uw email is ontvangen. Merk op dat het goed mogelijk is dat u geen
persoonlijk antwoord van ons ontvangt, maar alle meldinge
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:29:26PM +0200, Robert Vollmert wrote:
> Another solution is using vsound (debian package available) with
Already suggested on this list. Unfortunately it randomly segfaults,
usually 45 minutes or so into a one hour recording.
> realplayer (or better, trplayer:
Cool p
At Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:23:15 -0400,
Carl Fink wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:57:57AM +0800, csj wrote:
>
> > Why not try mplayer?
>
> Because it doesn't work well with streaming stuff in general and
> never with RealAudio, on my system.
>
> > If the url's plain http://, wget.
>
> Will w
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:23:15PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:57:57AM +0800, csj wrote:
>
> > Why not try mplayer?
>
> Because it doesn't work well with streaming stuff in general and
> never with RealAudio, on my system.
mplayer works for capturing realaudio streams he
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:23:15PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:57:57AM +0800, csj wrote:
>
> > Why not try mplayer?
>
> Because it doesn't work well with streaming stuff in general and
> never with RealAudio, on my system.
>
> > If the url's plain http://, wget.
>
> Wi
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:57:57AM +0800, csj wrote:
> Why not try mplayer?
Because it doesn't work well with streaming stuff in general and
never with RealAudio, on my system.
> If the url's plain http://, wget.
Will wget work with rtsp streams?
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:40:44 -0400,
Carl Fink wrote:
>
> I remember, sometime last year, using a replacement sound
> module to capture streaming audio to a file. It worked quite
> well.
>
> Then I didn't have to do it for over six months and completely
> forgot what the program was called.
>
>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:18:01AM +0200, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:40:44PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> > I remember, sometime last year, using a replacement sound module to capture
> > streaming audio to a file. It worked quite well.
>
> Are you thinking of something like
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:40:44PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> I remember, sometime last year, using a replacement sound module to capture
> streaming audio to a file. It worked quite well.
Are you thinking of something like vsound?
--
groetjes, carel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
I remember, sometime last year, using a replacement sound module to capture
streaming audio to a file. It worked quite well.
Then I didn't have to do it for over six months and completely forgot what
the program was called.
Anyone want to jog my memory?
Thanks.
--
Carl Fink [E
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 12:50:45AM +, Hugh Saunders wrote:
> hello i am using kernel 2.4.20-686u1205-p2-a
> and am trying to load linux-wlan-ng modules
> these modules were compiled for 2.4.20-pre11-486u1027-sus
> would it be possible to alter the version on these modules?
Maybe...but the ke
hello i am using kernel 2.4.20-686u1205-p2-a
and am trying to load linux-wlan-ng modules
these modules were compiled for 2.4.20-pre11-486u1027-sus
would it be possible to alter the version on these modules?
they load fine with insmod -f but not with modprobe. This is a pain as
modprobe is used in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 06 Jan 2003 1:53 pm, Robert Land wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 06:00:43PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > I just received an e-mail that looked as though it at come from this
> > list, (from "nate" ) but in closer inspection it had done no
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 06:00:43PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> I just received an e-mail that looked as though it at come from this list,
> (from "nate" ) but in closer inspection it had done nothing of the sort
> having been forwarded through a mail server at free.fr from a dial up account
> at
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 06:00:43PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> Had to forward because the list bounced it as having an attachment (html
> iframe which I now removed from message)
>
> - -- Forwarded Message --
>
> Subject: Beware FAKE e-mails being sent a
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
