I'm trying to configure exim for a satellite (option #3) and keep getting the
following errors in my logs:
lookup of host "mail.mydomain.tld" failed in smarthost router.
I can ping this same address, so I assumed that the DNS was working correctly...
I entered the IP address for the mail server
I have a question regarding exim:
running eximconfig I was asked the 'visible mail name', and entered
'solnet.ch' and everything seems to run ok, well, quite:
If I want to test my mail configuration sending a mail to myself, I cant:
mailq
0m 1.3K 18l4sB-000
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 02:57:57PM +0100, Martin Rowe wrote:
> Setting up exim (3.36-1) ...
> syntax error at /usr/sbin/eximconfig line 955, near "" )"
> (Might be a runaway multi-line "" string starting on line 948)
Yes, this looks like a bug to me. Actual
Hi folks
I was updating one of my boxes running sid, and as part of the
dependancies for new packages it pulled down exim. The problem was on
configuration:
Setting up exim (3.36-1) ...
syntax error at /usr/sbin/eximconfig line 955, near "" )"
(Might be a runaway multi
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:25:28AM +, Robin Gerard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 08:04:59PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:24:33AM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:12:40PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> > >
> > > > You can also cheat and put something simil
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 08:04:59PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:24:33AM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:12:40PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> >
> > > You can also cheat and put something similar in your ~/.muttrc -
> > > my_hdr From: ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:24:33AM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:12:40PM -0500, ktb wrote:
>
> > You can also cheat and put something similar in your ~/.muttrc -
> > my_hdr From: ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > kent
>
> I would say that the response in your previous email is
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:12:40PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> You can also cheat and put something similar in your ~/.muttrc -
> my_hdr From: ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> kent
I would say that the response in your previous email is more
appropriate. That method can be used to rewrite the envelope From
ad
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:54:21AM +, Robin Gerard wrote:
>
> ok I puted "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in /etc/email-addresses
> but the result is identical.
> It is amazing that my emails reach their destinations.
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" don't exist on my machine and don't exist
> on my ISP ?
You can a
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:54:21AM +, Robin Gerard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:10:31PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> >
> > Take a look at the bottom of /etc/exim.conf
> > the 'rewrite configuration' section.
> > Put the info for user in -
> > /etc/email-addresses
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> o
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:10:31PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 07:36:59PM +, Robin Gerard wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a problem with the headers of my
> > messages: ( my user agent = mutt-1.3.17i,my MTA = exim)
> >
> > If "my_login_on_my_machine" is "toto"
> >
> > m
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 07:36:59PM +, Robin Gerard wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem with the headers of my
> messages: ( my user agent = mutt-1.3.17i,my MTA = exim)
>
> If "my_login_on_my_machine" is "toto"
>
> my header is :
>
> L1: 14tZ65-Tn-00-H
> L2: toto 1000 1000
> L3: <[EM
Hello,
I have a problem with the headers of my
messages: ( my user agent = mutt-1.3.17i,my MTA = exim)
If "my_login_on_my_machine" is "toto"
my header is :
L1: 14tZ65-Tn-00-H
L2: toto 1000 1000
L3: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
L4: 9888481133 0
L5: -ident toto
L6: -received protocol local
L7: -body
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 09:54:04PM +0100, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 2) direct delivery:
> >
> > Depending on your exim configuration outgoing mail is sent directly to
> > your
> > ISP via SMTP or [...]
>
> To the ISP? Outgoing mail is sent "di
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) writes:
> Apart from the other reasons mentioned already, a lot of people reject
> mail coming from known dial-up IP addresses, since it's a technique
> often used by spammers. Thus using your ISP's smarthost generally
> increases the likelihood of your mail being
Griffith Feeney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm in the process of setting up exim/fetchmail/procmail/mutt on Debian
>2.2. I've used eximconfig option 2, for which outgoing mail is sent via a
>"smarthost" and incoming mail is picked up from one or more POP servers
Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2) direct delivery:
>
> Depending on your exim configuration outgoing mail is sent directly to your
> ISP via SMTP or [...]
To the ISP? Outgoing mail is sent "directly" to the DNS MX records of
the given host (if the DNS MX lookup succedes).
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Griffith Feeney wrote:
> I'm in the process of setting up exim/fetchmail/procmail/mutt on Debian
> 2.2. I've used eximconfig option 2, for which outgoing mail is sent via a
> "smarthost" and incoming mail is picked up from one or more POP server
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 09:01:18AM -1000, Griffith Feeney wrote:
...
> Getting incoming mail from POP servers makes sense, since I'm only
> intermittantly connected, but why not have exim send mail directly? What is
> gained or saved by going through the "smarthost"?
I think you are mixing two dis
I'm in the process of setting up exim/fetchmail/procmail/mutt on Debian
2.2. I've used eximconfig option 2, for which outgoing mail is sent via a
"smarthost" and incoming mail is picked up from one or more POP servers.
Getting incoming mail from POP servers makes s
On Tue, Apr 07, 1998 at 08:19:10PM +1000, Alan Eugene Davis wrote:
> I had to back out of exim 1.90-2 because the eximconfig script
> bombed. I don't know why, but when I installed 1.89.1-1, the script
> ran perfectly.
eximconfig shouldn't run on upgrades, so I'm surp
I had to back out of exim 1.90-2 because the eximconfig script
bombed. I don't know why, but when I installed 1.89.1-1, the script
ran perfectly.
This is by leaps and bounds the easiest mail transport agent I have
yet to install. I don't know yet whether it works: I'm encou
22 matches
Mail list logo