Re: exim / amavis-ng overload

2003-07-18 Thread David Fokkema
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 02:45:38PM +0100, Randy Orrison wrote: > David Fokkema wrote: > | On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:26:35AM +0100, Randy Orrison wrote: > |>David Fokkema wrote: > |>|Many, many mails were downloaded (thanks to this fine group, :-) and > |>|almost immediately, my server became irres

Re: exim / amavis-ng overload

2003-07-16 Thread Randy Orrison
David Fokkema wrote: | On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:26:35AM +0100, Randy Orrison wrote: |>David Fokkema wrote: |>|Many, many mails were downloaded (thanks to this fine group, :-) and |>|almost immediately, my server became irresponsive. |>[In exim.conf:] |>deliver_load_max = 4 |>queue_only_load = 4 |

Re: exim / amavis-ng overload

2003-07-16 Thread David Fokkema
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:26:35AM +0100, Randy Orrison wrote: > David Fokkema wrote: > >Many, many mails were downloaded (thanks to this fine group, :-) and > >almost immediately, my server became irresponsive. I managed to squeeze > >in and run top which came on after three minutes and saw my loa

Re: exim / amavis-ng overload

2003-07-16 Thread Randy Orrison
David Fokkema wrote: Many, many mails were downloaded (thanks to this fine group, :-) and almost immediately, my server became irresponsive. I managed to squeeze in and run top which came on after three minutes and saw my load increase from 20 to 30 to 50 to 77.81. I had a few exim processes and _l

exim / amavis-ng overload

2003-07-14 Thread David Fokkema
Hi group, Had my system offline for about 36 hours to try out fai (on a different drive). After this period, sunday evening, already late, I reconnected my original drive, started the server and watched the connection coming up. Many, many mails were downloaded (thanks to this fine group, :-) and