Nate Duehr wrote:
Ick. Do you monitor port 25 outbound at your border for spikes in
traffic? Seems like in some cases that would be the only way you'd ever
see it when dealing with the low-end ultra-clueless hosted customers.
No idea, I don't work in that department :) There's monitoring for
koffiejunkie wrote:
That's odd. Someone who would go through the time/effort to set up
qmail didn't secure their box? Weird.
Well, it's like this. I work for a hosting company, a lot of our
clients use a certain hosting panel whose name I won't mention. This
Smells like Plesk. (GRIN)
On Friday 28 March 2008 01:00:23 pm Nate Duehr wrote:
> koffiejunkie wrote:
> > Nate Duehr wrote:
> >> Qmail is fast, and can handle an incredible amount of mail thrown at it,
> >
> > I have heard and read that claim so many times but, after years of
> > having to admin qmail servers, have yet to s
koffiejunkie wrote:
Nate Duehr wrote:
Qmail is fast, and can handle an incredible amount of mail thrown at it,
I have heard and read that claim so many times but, after years of
having to admin qmail servers, have yet to seen it handle huge amounts
of mail with even half the grace that Postfix
Nate Duehr wrote:
Qmail is fast, and can handle an incredible amount of mail thrown at it,
I have heard and read that claim so many times but, after years of
having to admin qmail servers, have yet to seen it handle huge amounts
of mail with even half the grace that Postfix does. I regularly
Martin Marcher wrote:
PS: if there's a compelling reason to go in the sendmail direction (or
any other mta) i'm willing to do that, but I refuse qmail because of
licensing issues
Depends on why you want know another one. If you make money
supporting/fixing mail servers that other people have
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:13:37PM +0100, Martin Marcher wrote:
> I guess I'll add myself to the sendmail people then. Can't be that bad
> and I don't plan to spend vast amounts of time on that, only on a as
> needed basis :)
>
> > If it were me and I only knew postfix, I'd find something else
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've heard comments from respected frequent posters on this list both
> that they use postfix and that debian's decision to have Exim as default
> was controversial.
> I also lurk on OpenBSD's misc list. OB
Kevin Mark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:13:19PM +0100, Martin Marcher wrote:
PS: if there's a compelling reason to go in the sendmail direction (or
any other mta) i'm willing to do that, but I refuse qmail because of
licensing issues
Are you aware that qmail is now 'public domain' as of la
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:13:19PM +0100, Martin Marcher wrote:
>
> PS: if there's a compelling reason to go in the sendmail direction (or
> any other mta) i'm willing to do that, but I refuse qmail because of
> licensing issues
Are you aware that qmail is now 'public domain' as of last year?
-K
-
On Monday 24 March 2008 06:23:32 am Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> I've only used Exim because it's debian's default. Exim v.3 was quite
> simple to set up. Exim v.4 became far more complicated, so much so that
> debian made a debconf front-end to configuring it. I still had to make
> some tweaks but
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:13:19PM +0100, Martin Marcher wrote:
> I've been a happy user of postfix for a long time but I generally
> consider it a knowledge lag not to know at least one competing product
> (which I don't).
>
> So it's time to change that and since I use debian I figured it can't
Hello,
I've been a happy user of postfix for a long time but I generally
consider it a knowledge lag not to know at least one competing product
(which I don't).
So it's time to change that and since I use debian I figured it can't
be too bad to learn exim, a bit of googling around just brought up
13 matches
Mail list logo
