http://lists.debian.org/
"Reply-to-all" violates list rules (and I subscribe to the list and don't need
two copies in my mail spool). Please use your MUA's "Reply-to-Mailing List"
option instead.
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:41, Nate Duehr wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 April 2
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:54, listrcv wrote:
ChadDavis wrote:
If so, then does Postfix, as the default MTA for the debian system,
The default MTA is still exim, isn't it?
In Debian, yes. In the Unix world in general, it still appears to be
sendmail.
Might as well sa
Ron Johnson wrote:
If so, then does Postfix, as the default MTA for the debian system,
The default MTA is still exim, isn't it?
In Debian, yes. In the Unix world in general, it still appears to be
sendmail.
But since all(?) MTAs provide a /usr/sbin/sendmail, it's irrelevant
to the user,
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 17:46 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:54, listrcv wrote:
> > ChadDavis wrote:
> > > If so, then does Postfix, as the default MTA for the debian system,
> >
> > The default MTA is still exim, isn't it?
>
> In Debian, yes. In the Unix world in general,
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 17:43 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Monday 03 April 2006 09:56, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:48 -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:28:58AM -0600, ChadDavis wrote:
> > > > Does cron talk to the MTA with the SMTP port?
> > >
>
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:54, listrcv wrote:
> ChadDavis wrote:
> > If so, then does Postfix, as the default MTA for the debian system,
>
> The default MTA is still exim, isn't it?
In Debian, yes. In the Unix world in general, it still appears to be
sendmail.
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XM
Most of the English world read from top down, not in random order, please
quote accordingly.
http://ursine.ca/Top_Posting
On Monday 03 April 2006 11:36, ChadDavis wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> And sendmail is an MTA? Sendmail hands it off to postfix?
Sendmail is an MTA, so is postifx. Sendmail would
On Monday 03 April 2006 17:31, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 01:16 +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:56:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:48 -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:28:58AM -0600, ChadDavis
On Monday 03 April 2006 09:56, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:48 -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:28:58AM -0600, ChadDavis wrote:
> > > Does cron talk to the MTA with the SMTP port?
> >
> > No, it pipes messages to /usr/sbin/sendmail.
>
> Why doesn't it
ChadDavis wrote:
If so, then does Postfix, as the default MTA for the debian system,
The default MTA is still exim, isn't it?
GH
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 01:16 +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:56:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:48 -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:28:58AM -0600, ChadDavis wrote:
> > > > Does cron talk to the MTA with the SMTP po
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:56:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:48 -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:28:58AM -0600, ChadDavis wrote:
> > > Does cron talk to the MTA with the SMTP port?
> >
> > No, it pipes messages to /usr/sbin/sendmail.
>
> W
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 12:35:54PM -0600, ChadDavis wrote:
> And sendmail is an MTA? Sendmail hands it off to postfix?
Sendmail used to be *the* MTA, so many programs coded back in the day
hardcoded the assumption that they could use /usr/sbin/sendmail to
inject mail for delivery.
MTAs nowaday
Matthew,And sendmail is an MTA? Sendmail hands it off to postfix? If so, then does Postfix, as the default MTA for the debian system, even run an SMTP port service?Chad
On 4/3/06, Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:28:58AM -0600, ChadDavis wrote:> Does cron t
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 12:26 -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:56:17AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Why doesn't it use "mail"?
>
> Does it matter somehow?
I don't know. I thought you did...
--
-
Ron Joh
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:56:17AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Why doesn't it use "mail"?
Does it matter somehow?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:48 -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:28:58AM -0600, ChadDavis wrote:
> > Does cron talk to the MTA with the SMTP port?
>
> No, it pipes messages to /usr/sbin/sendmail.
Why doesn't it use "mail"?
--
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:28:58AM -0600, ChadDavis wrote:
> Does cron talk to the MTA with the SMTP port?
No, it pipes messages to /usr/sbin/sendmail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GH,
But there may other programs running that try to send mail, like cron,
for example. You would have to take care that sending mail from such
programs will work.
So this means that a local MTA is a core functional part of a unix
system, I mean if something like cron wants to use it? So
the
ChadDavis wrote:
> an incoming
mail server and an outgoing mail server. This means that it must listen on
some port to receive email from the outside world ( this is port 25?, SMTP
). And it means that it must listen on some internal port, or scan some
local directories, for mail to send out t
client".
> Thanks Ron,
> Chad
> On 3/30/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 14:01 -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I'm pretty unfamiliar with email servers. I need to install
>
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 14:01 -0700, ChadDavis wrote:> Hello.>> I'm pretty unfamiliar with email servers. I need to install a> server in my local network to use for development of another> application. I just need a mail server availabl
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 10:00 +0800, Rocky Ou wrote:
> On 3/31/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 14:01 -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I'm pretty unfamiliar with email serv
On 3/31/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 14:01 -0700, ChadDavis wrote:> Hello.>> I'm pretty unfamiliar with email servers. I need to install a> server in my local network to use for development of another> application. I just need a mai
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 14:01 -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm pretty unfamiliar with email servers. I need to install a
> server in my local network to use for development of another
> application. I just need a mail server available for the appli-
> cation. I
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 02:01:31PM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm pretty unfamiliar with email servers. I need to install a server in my
> local network to use for development of another application. I just need a
> mail server available for the application. I rea
ChadDavis wrote:
Hello.
I'm pretty unfamiliar with email servers. I need to install a server
in my local network to use for development of another application. I
just need a mail server available for the application. I read some of
the online documentation and became a bit confused
>I just need a
> mail server available for the application.
postfix+courier
> I read some of the online
> documentation and became a bit confused about what constitutes a server.
> Postfix is on the system.
4only send email
> What does it do? I don't think it has anything
> to do with my email c
Hello.
I'm pretty unfamiliar with email servers. I need to install a
server in my local network to use for development of another
application. I just need a mail server available for the
application. I read some of the online documentation and became a
bit confused about what constitu
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 10:35:22PM -0600, hanasaki wrote:
| Why is it that when the default for a domain. For example, in my case,
| hanaden.com maps to a cname, MTA's fail
I believe that part of an RFC states that MX records can only point to
IP addresses or A records but not to CNAME records.
Why is it that when the default for a domain. For example, in my case,
hanaden.com maps to a cname, MTA's fail
ex:
hanaden.com mx IP
... no problem
hanaden.com mx somename.domainD.org
... email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not
... [EMA
31 matches
Mail list logo
