Re: emacs without documentation nonsense

2006-11-18 Thread Oleg Verych
On 2006-11-15, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006-11-15, hendrik wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:00:37AM +, Tyler wrote: >>> I don't know that it's enough reason to go on living, but you will find >>> those docs (in)conveniently stored in the package >>> emacs21-common-non-

Re: emacs without documentation nonsense

2006-11-16 Thread John L Fjellstad
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why duck? Everyone knows that the only component missing from emacs is > generally a good text editor. :-) And what's wrong with viper? :-) -- John L. Fjellstad web: http://www.fjellstad.org/ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes -- To UNS

Re: emacs without documentation nonsense

2006-11-15 Thread Tyler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which devs are the ones responsible here: the Debian devs who put it there, or the upstream ones that presumably put non-free constraints on the documentatin license? Or is it all a big misunderstanding? -- hendrik Honestly, I think both sides are suffering from

Re: emacs without documentation nonsense

2006-11-14 Thread Oleg Verych
On 2006-11-15, hendrik wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:00:37AM +, Tyler wrote: >> I don't know that it's enough reason to go on living, but you will find >> those docs (in)conveniently stored in the package >> emacs21-common-non-dfsg, in the non-free repos. Sure i can. Anyone can. But th

Re: emacs without documentation nonsense

2006-11-14 Thread Bill Wohler
The GFDL is not DFSG-compliant as it specifies invariant parts. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: emacs without documentation nonsense

2006-11-14 Thread John Hasler
hendrik writes: > Which devs are the ones responsible here: the Debian devs who put it > there, or the upstream ones that presumably put non-free constraints on > the documentatin license? Or is it all a big misunderstanding? Some of each. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: emacs without documentation nonsense

2006-11-14 Thread hendrik
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:00:37AM +, Tyler wrote: > I don't know that it's enough reason to go on living, but you will find > those docs (in)conveniently stored in the package > emacs21-common-non-dfsg, in the non-free repos. > > At some point I wonder if the devs will realize that they und

Re: emacs without documentation nonsense

2006-11-14 Thread Tyler
I don't know that it's enough reason to go on living, but you will find those docs (in)conveniently stored in the package emacs21-common-non-dfsg, in the non-free repos. At some point I wonder if the devs will realize that they undermine their efforts to encourage users to use a dfsg-free syst

Re: emacs without documentation nonsense

2006-11-14 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:36:58AM +, George Borisov wrote: > Oleg Verych wrote: > > It's here. > > Congratulations. > > Are there reasons to live? > > Yes: http://www.vim.org/ > > (ducks) > Why duck? Everyone knows that the only component missing from emacs is generally a good text editor.

emacs without documentation nonsense

2006-11-14 Thread Oleg Verych
It's here. Congratulations. Are there reasons to live? -- -o--=O`C /. .\ #oo'L O o <___=E M.-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: emacs without documentation nonsense

2006-11-14 Thread George Borisov
Oleg Verych wrote: > It's here. > Congratulations. > Are there reasons to live? Yes: http://www.vim.org/ (ducks) :-p -- George Borisov DXSolutions Ltd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]