On 13/04/19 01:43, Peter Wiersig wrote:
Pétùr writes:
I use neomutt with emacs.
If you're using the kitchen sink, why not stay completely in emacs?
https://emacs.stackexchange.com/q/12927
(Disclaimer: I wrote one of the answers to that meta question)
I used mutt for decades, I still think i
Thanks.
In fact my code was working, but the terminal I used (xfce4-terminal)
has a built-in shortcut for "quit" binded to Ctrl+q. This is why Emacs,
when launched inside xfce4-terminal, closes instead of going back to mutt.
Silly...
On Mon 29 Apr 2019 at 10:38:40 (+0200), Pétùr wrote:
> On 12/04/19 13:00, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 12 Apr 2019 at 18:04:45 (+0200), Pétùr wrote:
> > > I use neomutt with emacs.
> > >
> > > I would like to quickly save and kill a buffer in emacs. This is to
> > > avoid typing C-x C-s and, the
On 12/04/19 13:00, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 12 Apr 2019 at 18:04:45 (+0200), Pétùr wrote:
I use neomutt with emacs.
I would like to quickly save and kill a buffer in emacs. This is to
avoid typing C-x C-s and, then, C-x C-c when sending an email. I want
one shortcut to save and kill the buffe
Pétùr writes:
> I use neomutt with emacs.
If you're using the kitchen sink, why not stay completely in emacs?
https://emacs.stackexchange.com/q/12927
(Disclaimer: I wrote one of the answers to that meta question)
I used mutt for decades, I still think it's a fine tool, but I found
more happines
On Fri 12 Apr 2019 at 18:04:45 (+0200), Pétùr wrote:
> I use neomutt with emacs.
>
> I would like to quickly save and kill a buffer in emacs. This is to
> avoid typing C-x C-s and, then, C-x C-c when sending an email. I want
> one shortcut to save and kill the buffer and be back quickly in mutt to
I use neomutt with emacs.
I would like to quickly save and kill a buffer in emacs. This is to
avoid typing C-x C-s and, then, C-x C-c when sending an email. I want
one shortcut to save and kill the buffer and be back quickly in mutt to
send the email.
I tried the following inside my .emacs (bind
7 matches
Mail list logo
