[SOLVED] Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
A single dual port gigabit card on each server. I'm more concerned about performance than redundancy. The bond operates in 2 gigabit mode: ethtool bond1 (...)     Speed: 2000Mb/s     Duplex: Full (...) My working config (will play with it a bit more): auto bond1 iface bond1 inet static     sl

[SOLVED] Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
My config was ok and it's working like a charm after both servers have been rebooted. For some reason "systemctl restart networking" wasn't enough.

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:14:15PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Hello, > > I have 2 servers running Proxmox 5.2 (based on Debian 9). Have you considered using OpenVSwitch for the task? > I've connected Ethernet ports between them with a pair of cross over cables. Ok. > iface e

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Dan Purgert
Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Hello, > > I have 2 servers running Proxmox 5.2 (based on Debian 9). > > I've connected Ethernet ports between them with a pair of cross over > cables. Are these "just" 10/100 cards? I mean, if they're gbit capable, crossover cables violate the spec, and you're limiting th

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Yes, 192.168.200.1 and 192.168.200.2 netmask 30 All ports and cables work when tested 1-1 but not with my 2-2 bonding config. Looks like your LACP is correct but your IP addressing is wrong. Do you have parentheses in it, or are you trying to suggest that one is .1 and the other is .2? -dsr-

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Dan Ritter
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 10:46:15AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:45:14PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > > Yes, 192.168.200.1 and 192.168.200.2 netmask 30 > > All ports and cables work when tested 1-1 but not with my 2-2 bonding > > config. > > > > > Looks like your LACP is

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Dan Ritter
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:45:14PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Yes, 192.168.200.1 and 192.168.200.2 netmask 30 > All ports and cables work when tested 1-1 but not with my 2-2 bonding > config. > > > Looks like your LACP is correct but your IP addressing is wrong. > > > > Do you have parenthese

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Dan Ritter
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:14:15PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Hello, > > I have 2 servers running Proxmox 5.2 (based on Debian 9). > > I've connected Ethernet ports between them with a pair of cross over cables. > > When only 1 port on each and 1 cable are used connectivity looks fine with >

dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hello, I have 2 servers running Proxmox 5.2 (based on Debian 9). I've connected Ethernet ports between them with a pair of cross over cables. When only 1 port on each and 1 cable are used connectivity looks fine with the following config: -