Re: dselect first impressions

2002-06-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 07:40:36PM +0200, Aaron Isotton wrote: > Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > dselect is "standard" by any reasonable definition of standard, > > regardless of what some people would like to think. > > Strange. Having read > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2

Re: dselect first impressions

2002-06-09 Thread Aaron Isotton
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show aptitude > Package: aptitude > Priority: optional > Section: admin > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show dpkg > Package: dpkg > Essential: yes > Priority: required > Section: base > > dselect is "standard" by

Re: dselect first impressions

2002-06-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 04:24:04PM +0200, Aaron Isotton wrote: > > Here I list my first impressions of woody's dselect. If you think > > these are bugs, please file them in your name. I'm don't feel like > > submitting bug reports at this time. I suppose I should try some of > > the newer dselec

Re: dselect first impressions

2002-06-08 Thread Aaron Isotton
[This should go to debian-user, not debian-devel] Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here I list my first impressions of woody's dselect. If you think > these are bugs, please file them in your name. I'm don't feel like > submitting bug reports at this time. I suppose I should try some