On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 08:33:52PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Mutt may be a lesser piece of crap than most mailers, but it is still a
> > piece of crap. It screws up when "From:" is missing, and acts as if you
> > had send it.
>
> I think it may be worse than that: I set my MTA up to add
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:12:58PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:39:09PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to
> > say:
> > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:26:19PM -0700, PETER EAST
On Fri March 21 2008 15:55:08 Chris Henry wrote:
> Huh? In my inbox, the e-mail Daniel referred to shows Mirko Parthey
> correctly (I also checked the original message and it still looks
> legitimate. Is there anything I miss?? s:
Now cc'ing listmaster.
There's more than one message from Mirko.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:29:19 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:39:09PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
[...]
> > Regards,
> > MIrko
>
> I did not write this email. I don't have any problem with it, but I
> didn't write it.
>
> Whoever did: please refr
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:39:09PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:26:19PM -0700, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
[removed]
> I did not write this email. I don't have any problem with it, but I
> didn't write it.
>
>
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Chris Henry shared this with us all:
>--} Judging by the Message-IDs and other headers, it probably came from
>--} > Mirko Parthey, who will hopefully continue to use his real name and
>--} > address in the future.
>--} Huh? In my inbox, the e-mail Daniel referred to shows Mi
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:37:23PM +0100, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On 2008-03-21 19:29 +0100, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:39:09PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to
> > say:
> ^^
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-03-21 19:29 +0100, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:39:09PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to
> say:
> ^^
> Huh?
>
> >
On 2008-03-21 19:29 +0100, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:39:09PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
^^
Huh?
> I did not write this email. I don't have any problem with it, but I
> didn't write it.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:39:09PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:26:19PM -0700, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
> > I have these 5 bytes of machine code to
> > disassemble.
> >
> > b8 12 00 cd 10
> >
> > I've looked at gdb and objdump. Appears they
> > need
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:39:09PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:26:19PM -0700, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
> > I have these 5 bytes of machine code to
> > disassemble.
> >
> > b8 12 00 cd 10
> >
> > I've looked at gdb and objdump. Appears they
> > need a complete
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:26:19PM -0700, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
> I have these 5 bytes of machine code to
> disassemble.
>
> b8 12 00 cd 10
>
> I've looked at gdb and objdump. Appears they
> need a complete object file. Someone please
> give a clue.
Write the machine code to a file:
$ p
PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
> Folk,
>
> I have these 5 bytes of machine code to
> disassemble.
>
> b8 12 00 cd 10
>
> I've looked at gdb and objdump. Appears they
> need a complete object file. Someone please
> give a clue.
Find documentation for the specific processor and simply look it up!
Folk,
I have these 5 bytes of machine code to
disassemble.
b8 12 00 cd 10
I've looked at gdb and objdump. Appears they
need a complete object file. Someone please
give a clue.
Thanks, ... Peter E.
http://carnot.yi.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
14 matches
Mail list logo
