Re: digikam upgrade: plugins to be remove

2007-07-14 Thread H.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hello. > > I have the same problem : > * if i install digikam, then kipi-plugins is removed automatically > * if i install kipi, then digikam is removed . > :-( > > and about : >> "All plugins previously provided by the digikamimageplugins package are >> now included i

Re: digikam upgrade: plugins to be remove

2007-07-14 Thread roy . nico
hello. I have the same problem : * if i install digikam, then kipi-plugins is removed automatically * if i install kipi, then digikam is removed . :-( and about : > "All plugins previously provided by the digikamimageplugins package are > now included in this package." I don't see anymore in dig

[OT] Re: aptitude "why" command (was: digikam upgrade: plugins to be remove)

2007-07-07 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:38:46 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:30:36PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 20:23:03 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > > > > You can thank this list for the feature, I got the idea when I noticed > > > that s

Re: aptitude "why" command (was: digikam upgrade: plugins to be remove)

2007-07-06 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:30:36PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 20:23:03 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > > You can thank this list for the feature, I got the idea when I noticed > > that something like 99% of the questions people have about apt(itude) are > > of the

aptitude "why" command (was: digikam upgrade: plugins to be remove)

2007-07-06 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 20:23:03 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:55:48PM +0200, Florian Kulzer was heard to say: > > BTW, I just discovered that aptitude has recently learned a nifty new > > trick, the "why/why-not" command: [...] > You should also be able to get this

Re: digikam upgrade: plugins to be remove

2007-07-06 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:23:03PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:55:48PM +0200, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > was heard to say: > > BTW, I just discovered that aptitude has recently learned a nifty new > > trick, the "why/why-not" command: > You can thank thi

Re: digikam upgrade: plugins to be remove

2007-07-05 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:55:48PM +0200, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > BTW, I just discovered that aptitude has recently learned a nifty new > trick, the "why/why-not" command: > > $ aptitude why-not digikamimageplugins > i kde-extras Recommends digikam > p digikam

Re: digikam upgrade: plugins to be remove

2007-07-05 Thread H.S.
Florian Kulzer wrote: BTW, I just discovered that aptitude has recently learned a nifty new trick, the "why/why-not" command: $ aptitude why-not digikamimageplugins i kde-extras Recommends digikam p digikamConflicts digikamimageplugins This is really useful to figure out what is goin

Re: digikam upgrade: plugins to be remove

2007-07-05 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 12:44:00 -0400, H.S. wrote: > Hello, > > On Debian Testing, if I try to upgrade digikam, aptitude wants to remove > digikamimageplugins and kipi-plugins (the actual output is further below). > Now, how do I know why these removals are necessary? Add the "-D" option to get

digikam upgrade: plugins to be remove

2007-07-05 Thread H.S.
Hello, On Debian Testing, if I try to upgrade digikam, aptitude wants to remove digikamimageplugins and kipi-plugins (the actual output is further below). Now, how do I know why these removals are necessary? And how do I find out if I should go ahead with the upgrade since, maybe the new pack