mmissett wrote:
Kent said:
So, post the complete contents of
/etc/network/interfaces.
Also post the output of "ifconfig".
Also post the nic-related output of "lspci".
And perhaps post the output of "lsmod".
If you say so:
The /etc/network/interfaces file as it currently
stands
Kent,
Sorry, I should have included this question in
the previous post, and forgot:
Will pump run at all if dhcp is not enabled in
/etc/network/interfaces? Because eth0 will *not*
come up at all with dhcp enabled there. So
pump is not normally being called up anyway,
right? (Since eth0 is
Kent said:
>So, post the complete contents of
/etc/network/interfaces.
>Also post the output of "ifconfig".
>Also post the nic-related output of "lspci".
>And perhaps post the output of "lsmod".
If you say so:
The /etc/network/interfaces file as it currently
stands (the only way it will come u
mmissett wrote:
Kent,
Thanks yet again. Sorry if I was not clear. I
*did* run:
ps ax | grep -E 'dhcp|pump'
exactly that way.
What it produced in response was, exactly:
233pts/0 S 0:00 grep -E dhcp|pump
I don't know what that means, but if I am
understanding you correctly, it means pu
Kent West wrote:
>You need single quotes around the
'dhcp|pump' part:
>
>>ps ax | grep -E 'dhcp|pump'
>>
>> 215 ?S 0:00 pump -i eth0
>
>If you still don't get something like the above,
then pump is not running.
>
>It's _probably_ some sort of configuration
problem, but just to
>
mmissett wrote:
Kent,
Thank you again for your response. To answer
your questions:
Do you have other machines getting dhcp
addresses on this LAN? Or better
yet, can you throw a Knoppix CD in the
computer and see if it gets an
address? (There may be some sort of
hardware/cabling/networ
Kent,
Thank you again for your response. To answer
your questions:
>Do you have other machines getting dhcp
>addresses on this LAN? Or better
>yet, can you throw a Knoppix CD in the
>computer and see if it gets an
>address? (There may be some sort of
>hardware/cabling/network issue.)
I hav
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 09:15:07AM -0500, mmissett wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who replied. I didn't want to
> weigh down my first post with a lot of info that
> might have been irrelevant (such as all the
> things I did that didn't work). To supply the
Hi again,
it is very important to hav
mmissett wrote:
Kent,
The changes you suggested to
/etc/network/interfaces are definitely not working.
With the file configured that way,
"/etc/init.d/networking start" returns "operation
failed". So does "ifup eth0". I should also
mention that I had never made changes to the
loopback
Kent,
The changes you suggested to
/etc/network/interfaces are definitely not working.
With the file configured that way,
"/etc/init.d/networking start" returns "operation
failed". So does "ifup eth0". I should also
mention that I had never made changes to the
loopback portion of the f
mmissett wrote:
Kent West said:
"the appropriate under-the-hood processes
take place."
Well, unfortunately, it didn't quite work out that
way. In fact, ifup would not work at all with
/etc/network/interfaces configured like that . The
following is exactly what I did to
/etc/network/inte
Kent West said:
"the appropriate under-the-hood processes
take place."
Well, unfortunately, it didn't quite work out that
way. In fact, ifup would not work at all with
/etc/network/interfaces configured like that . The
following is exactly what I did to
/etc/network/interfaces:
# ifac
mmissett wrote:
Thanks again to everybody for their answers.
My /etc/network/interfaces file is:
# /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file for
ifup(8), ifdown(8)
# The loopback interface
iface lo inet loopback
# The first network card - this entry was created
during the Debian installat
Thanks again to everybody for their answers.
My /etc/network/interfaces file is:
# /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file for
ifup(8), ifdown(8)
# The loopback interface
iface lo inet loopback
# The first network card - this entry was created
during the Debian installation
# (network,
"mmissett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /etc/network/interfaces has the following: first, it says the
> connection is static, which it isn't, it's DHCP.
First off, I'd try fixing that. Run 'ifdown eth0', replace the
current eth0 stanza with 'iface eth0 inet dhcp', then run 'ifup eth0'
and see w
mmissett wrote:
/etc/network/interfaces has the following:
I'd recommend you actually post the file, rather than describing it.
first, it says the connection is static, which it
isn't, it's DHCP. It says the address is
192.168.1.1 (The Mac OS, on which the
connection is working fine, says
Thanks to everyone who replied. I didn't want to
weigh down my first post with a lot of info that
might have been irrelevant (such as all the
things I did that didn't work). To supply the
information that was asked for, however:
/etc/network/interfaces has the following:
first, it says the
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 05:18:12PM -0500, mmissett wrote:
> Apologies first if this if a very basic and/or stupid
> question, but I have not managed to find
> anything about it in the archives and
> documentation that seems to be working.
> I am running potato on a powerpc (Mac G4)
> and have
Apologies first if this if a very basic and/or stupid
question, but I have not managed to find
anything about it in the archives and
documentation that seems to be working.
I am running potato on a powerpc (Mac G4)
and have just changed the computer from
dial-up to cable internet. The conn
On (18/12/03 17:22), mmissett wrote:
>
> Apologies first if this if a very basic and/or stupid
> question, but I have not managed to find
> anything about it in the archives and
> documentation that seems to be working.
> I am running potato on a powerpc (Mac G4)
> and have just changed the
mmissett wrote:
Apologies first if this if a very basic and/or stupid
question, but I have not managed to find
anything about it in the archives and
documentation that seems to be working.
I am running potato on a powerpc (Mac G4)
and have just changed the computer from
dial-up to cable int
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:22:51 -0500, mmissett wrote:
> Apologies first if this if a very basic and/or stupid question, but
> I have not managed to find anything about it in the archives and
> documentation that seems to be working. I am running potato on a
> powerpc (Mac G4) and have just changed th
Apologies first if this if a very basic and/or stupid
question, but I have not managed to find
anything about it in the archives and
documentation that seems to be working.
I am running potato on a powerpc (Mac G4)
and have just changed the computer from
dial-up to cable internet. The conn
23 matches
Mail list logo
