On 15 Jan 2004, Ryan Mackay wrote:
> 192.168.0.20 is not a subnet, i think what you are after is 192.168.0.0
> --
> Cheers,
> rinmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
Thanks to you and Jacob for the advice. I find I don't need dhcp after
all for the moment, which is a relief, but I'll keep your replies fo
192.168.0.20 is not a subnet, i think what you are after is 192.168.0.0
--
Cheers,
rinmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:49:33 +
Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My /etc/dhcpd.conf is as follows:
>
>
> # dhcpd.conf
> #
> subnet 192.168.0.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 {}
> -
>
> This produces the following error
My /etc/dhcpd.conf is as follows:
# dhcpd.conf
#
subnet 192.168.0.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 {}
-
This produces the following error in syslog:
--
No subnet declaration for eth0
4 matches
Mail list logo