Joel Johnson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> >> A basic question that I can't seem to find an answer to (maybe not so
> >> basic?).
> >>
> >> Using LVM and therefore devmapper, the volume names are such that >they
> >> are accessible under /dev/mapper/-. Likewise, these
> >> names ar
>> A basic question that I can't seem to find an answer to (maybe not so
>> basic?).
>>
>> Using LVM and therefore devmapper, the volume names are such that >they
>> are accessible under /dev/mapper/-. Likewise, these
>> names are used in reporting (du, df, mount, etc...). I would prefer >to
>> ha
Joel Johnson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> A basic question that I can't seem to find an answer to (maybe not so
> basic?).
>
> Using LVM and therefore devmapper, the volume names are such that they
> are accessible under /dev/mapper/-. Likewise, these
> names are used in repor
A basic question that I can't seem to find an answer to (maybe not so
basic?).
Using LVM and therefore devmapper, the volume names are such that they
are accessible under /dev/mapper/-. Likewise, these
names are used in reporting (du, df, mount, etc...). I would prefer to
have the volumes rep
4 matches
Mail list logo