Re: Pine (Was: [Fwd: dependencies rpoblem])

2000-06-21 Thread p . b . burton
Thanks for this. Phil >If you're running potato (or probably woody) you can get an >unauthorized Pine binary from >http://members.mint.net/frodo/pine/ > >noah > >On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:09:19PM +, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > 2.1. One th

Re: Pine (Was: [Fwd: dependencies rpoblem])

2000-06-21 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
If you're running potato (or probably woody) you can get an unauthorized Pine binary from http://members.mint.net/frodo/pine/ noah On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:09:19PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > 2.1. One thing I missed right off the bat

Pine (Was: [Fwd: dependencies rpoblem])

2000-06-21 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:09:19PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > 2.1. One thing I missed right off the bat is the Pine mailer. It is not > available from Debian AFAIK. Yes, it is available _from_ Debian, but only as source. That's because pine does not install (by default) according to

Re: dependencies rpoblem

2000-06-20 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote: > > postfix was designed from the beginning with security in mind. And it's > > easier to configure than sendmail or qmail. > > Periodically I begin to believe in such statements only to after the > installation each time find myself desperately searc

Re: [Fwd: dependencies rpoblem]

2000-06-20 Thread p . b . burton
After having used SuSE for almost a year, I have just installed Debian 2.1. One thing I missed right off the bat is the Pine mailer. It is not available from Debian AFAIK. I downloaded it this morning and now have it working. The problem I run into is I am "pbburton" on the Linux system but "p

[Fwd: dependencies rpoblem]

2000-06-20 Thread jpb
Joachim Trinkwitz wrote: > > jpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > using a dialup connection, I have a different user name at my ISP (a > number/character combination) as my user name on my linux system at > home (I am really the only one or is it so that all other people like > me don't try to use p

Re: dependencies rpoblem

2000-06-20 Thread Joachim Trinkwitz
jpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > postfix was designed from the beginning with security in mind. And it's > easier to configure than sendmail or qmail. Periodically I begin to believe in such statements only to after the installation each time find myself desperately searching up and down the do

RE: dependencies rpoblem

2000-06-12 Thread Lehel Bernadt
On 12-Jun-2000 Chris Mason wrote: > I'm trying to install postfix and remove exim, I am having a problem because > "apt-get remove exim" fails because there are dependent programs. I don't > care, I would like to force the removal and then install postfix but even > "apt-get -f remove exim" fails.

Re: dependencies rpoblem

2000-06-12 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 02:33:41PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > I'm trying to install postfix and remove exim, I am having a problem because > "apt-get remove exim" fails because there are dependent programs. I don't > care, I would like to force the removal and then install postfix but even > "apt

Re: dependencies rpoblem

2000-06-12 Thread jpb
Sven Burgener wrote: > > >I had no problems ditching exim and installing postfix a few months > ago. > > What advantages / plus-points does postfix have over exim? > I have only been using exim for a week now. Ran sendmail before, but as > I wasn't able to configure it to my (simple) needs, I swi

Re: dependencies rpoblem

2000-06-12 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Chris Mason wrote: > When I try to run dselect, it wants to uninstall packages that I have > installed myself, so that won't do. You should try to fix that problem. But do run dselect update first, to make sure apt and dselect agree in the package available file... (also, mak

Re: dependencies rpoblem

2000-06-12 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Sven Burgener wrote: > >I had no problems ditching exim and installing postfix a few months > ago. > > What advantages / plus-points does postfix have over exim? Secure design, using chroot jails (even in Debian's default installation), only the postfix 'master' daemon runs a

RE: dependencies rpoblem

2000-06-12 Thread Chris Mason
2000 2:48 PM To: Henrique M Holschuh; Debian-User Subject: Re: dependencies rpoblem >I had no problems ditching exim and installing postfix a few months ago. What advantages / plus-points does postfix have over exim? I have only been using exim for a week now. Ran sendmail before, but as

Re: dependencies rpoblem

2000-06-12 Thread Sven Burgener
>I had no problems ditching exim and installing postfix a few months ago. What advantages / plus-points does postfix have over exim? I have only been using exim for a week now. Ran sendmail before, but as I wasn't able to configure it to my (simple) needs, I switched to exim. TIA Sven

Re: dependencies rpoblem

2000-06-12 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Chris Mason wrote: > I'm trying to install postfix and remove exim, I am having a problem because > "apt-get remove exim" fails because there are dependent programs. I don't > care, I would like to force the removal and then install postfix but even > "apt-get -f remove exim"

dependencies rpoblem

2000-06-12 Thread Chris Mason
I'm trying to install postfix and remove exim, I am having a problem because "apt-get remove exim" fails because there are dependent programs. I don't care, I would like to force the removal and then install postfix but even "apt-get -f remove exim" fails. Is there a way to forcilble remove exim?