On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 06:36:32PM -0500, Bao C. Ha wrote:
> Personally, I don't think it is safe to mount the compactflash as
> the "live" root filesystem. It is not designed to have that many
> write-cycles as a regular hard disk. So, even with a larger size
> compactflash, what we are doing w
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 02:09:38PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Hi Joey,
> That's why I keep my whole root filesystem mounted read-only. My compact
> flash is only written to on clean shutdowns (rare..) when I rsync
> /var/log and other persistent state back to it, and when I upgrade or do
> some sysa
Bao C. Ha wrote:
> What I did in the article is for the OpenBrick-E. The OpenBrick-E
> has 256M RAM in the default configuration, compared to the 128M
> RAM OpenBrick. My next step would be to uncompress the cloop-
> based filesystem and mount its entirety on the tempfs. Next, I
> would be able
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:44:13PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Hi Joye,
> I read with interest your article
> (http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4540125636.html) on how you
> crammed Debian into a 32 mb compact flash on an openbrick E, as I did
> the same thing, but with a very different techniq
I read with interest your article
(http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4540125636.html) on how you
crammed Debian into a 32 mb compact flash on an openbrick E, as I did
the same thing, but with a very different technique on my openbrick.
My openbrick serves as a wireless gateway, doing ppp dial
5 matches
Mail list logo
