Re: Removing debian non-us from sources.list [was: debian non-us]

Chris Jones ha scritto: [...] > Get:1 http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release.gpg [189B] [...] > Get:2 http://mirror.pacific.net.au stable Release.gpg [386B] [...] > #deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ stable main I suggest you to substitute "stable" with "etch" in "sources.list" or yo

Re: Removing debian non-us from sources.list [was: debian non-us]

On Sat,22.Nov.08, 10:12:48, Chris Jones wrote: > So, it looks like I was still using the keyring from before etch went > stable (?) Yeap. Any idea why? > What's the purpose of 'apt-key update'? Hhmm, the manpage is not very verbose. Anyway, if debian-archive-keyring is up-to-date you shouldn

Re: Removing debian non-us from sources.list [was: debian non-us]

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 09:42:23AM EST, Andrei Popescu wrote: [..] > You are missing this key: > > pub 1024D/ADB11277 2006-09-17 > uid Etch Stable Release Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Please post the output of 'dpkg -l debian-archive-keyring' before: -- ii debian-archiv

Re: Removing debian non-us from sources.list [was: debian non-us]

On Sat,22.Nov.08, 09:31:11, Chris Jones wrote: > W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs: > B5D0C804ADB11277 > W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems > > > I'm a unclear as to w

Removing debian non-us from sources.list [was: debian non-us]

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 08:17:44AM EST, John Hasler wrote: > CJ writes: > > I have a feeling I just need to remove references to non-us mirrors in > > /etc/sources.list and run apt-get update but I don't want to hose my > > debian system either. > > Just remove the references to non-us. The law c

Re: debian non-us

CJ writes: > I have a feeling I just need to remove references to non-us mirrors in > /etc/sources.list and run apt-get update but I don't want to hose my > debian system either. Just remove the references to non-us. The law changed years ago. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: debian non-us

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 08:15:52AM EST, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Ups, again a stupid error writing you privately instead of to the > list ... > > So here my email again to the list: > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 01:59:30PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 200

Re: debian non-us

On Sat,22.Nov.08, 08:00:14, Chris Jones wrote: > Installed etch about 2 years ago .. and I'm pretty sure my sources.list > is the one that was generated when I did the install. > > That's why I posted. Nope, non-us was deprecated for sarge. > Couldn't find a debian doc that actually confirms

Re: debian non-us

Ups, again a stupid error writing you privately instead of to the list ... So here my email again to the list: On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 01:59:30PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:41:33AM -0500, Chris Jones wrote: > > I understand that the law has changed ov

Re: debian non-us

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:53:18AM EST, Micha wrote: > It doesn't exist anymore for new releases for quite some time now. unless you > installed a very long time ago things from non-us that were deprecated since > then you can safely remove it (and I double that there are such packages, > certainly

Re: debian non-us

It doesn't exist anymore for new releases for quite some time now. unless you installed a very long time ago things from non-us that were deprecated since then you can safely remove it (and I double that there are such packages, certainly nothing important) On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:41:33 -0500 Chris

debian non-us

I'm running stable and I just noticed that non-us.debian.org is not available and "apt-get update" gives me a bunch of errors. I understand that the law has changed over here and that I may not need this any more in my sources.list. Now, is there a document that would confirm this and explain wha

Re: Where is debian-non-US

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Glen Pfeiffer wrote: > Joe Hart wrote: >> Jochen Schulz wrote: >>> Correct. And on the EU level they are even discussing to make >>> a similar law obligatory for all member states. >> The EU is not a body (yet) that can enforce laws. Therefore, >> the

Re: Where is debian-non-US

Joe Hart wrote: > Jochen Schulz wrote: >> Correct. And on the EU level they are even discussing to make >> a similar law obligatory for all member states. > > The EU is not a body (yet) that can enforce laws. Therefore, > they cannot mandate laws. Correct me if I am wrong, please, but I believe J

Re: Where is debian-non-US

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jochen Schulz wrote: > Dave Ewart: >> On Tuesday, 06.03.2007 at 10:48 -0600, John Hasler wrote: >> >>> It it my understanding (which may be obsolete or even simply >>> erroneous) that in Germany computer games are not to be made available >>> to childr

Re: Where is debian-non-US

Dave Ewart: > On Tuesday, 06.03.2007 at 10:48 -0600, John Hasler wrote: > >> It it my understanding (which may be obsolete or even simply >> erroneous) that in Germany computer games are not to be made available >> to children unless they have been approved and that the approval costs >> money. T

Re: Where is debian-non-US

On Tuesday, 06.03.2007 at 10:48 -0600, John Hasler wrote: > > _Similar_ reasons. Germany, for example, has a licensing law for > > games (unless it has been repealed recently). > > Johannes writes: > > Germany has a licensing law for free software games? > > It it my understanding (which may be

Re: Where is debian-non-US

I wrote: > _Similar_ reasons. Germany, for example, has a licensing law for games > (unless it has been repealed recently). Johannes writes: > Germany has a licensing law for free software games? It it my understanding (which may be obsolete or even simply erroneous) that in Germany computer gam

Re: Where is debian-non-US

John Hasler wrote: >> (Aside: ``non-DE''? I thought the EU has so far staved off the >> software-patent idiocy.) > > _Similar_ reasons. Germany, for example, has a licensing law for games > (unless it has been repealed recently). Germany has a licensing law for free software games? I never thou

Re: Where is debian-non-US

I wrote: > Then for similar reasons we'll need non-JP, non-DE, non-AU... Max Hyre writes: > Good point. Let me amend that to suggest the [non-patent] distribution. > (Aside: ``non-DE''? I thought the EU has so far staved off the > software-patent idiocy.) _Similar_ reasons. Germany, for examp

Re: Where is debian-non-US

John Hasler wrote: > Max Hyre writes: >> Given the status of software patents, though, it might be time to revive >> [non-US]. > > Then for similar reasons we'll need non-JP, non-DE, non-AU... Good point. Let me amend that to suggest the [non-patent] distribution. (Aside: ``non-DE''? I

Re: Where is debian-non-US

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/07 18:28, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 13:58 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 03/03/07 13:47, Greg Folkert wrote: >>> On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 14:39 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:36:14PM -0500, Gre

Re: Where is debian-non-US

On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 13:58 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 03/03/07 13:47, Greg Folkert wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 14:39 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:36:14PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: > >>> It has been deprecated since Woody became oldstable, or exactly th

Re: Where is debian-non-US

ing changed recently? Where is debian-non-US? >>> Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago. >> Yet another exaple of enforcing US law to the rest of the world! >> > What are you talking about? The law was a US law dealing with US > citizens or residents

Re: Where is debian-non-US

Andras Lorincz writes: > Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US? I wrote: > Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago. idsvp-helga writes: > Yet another exaple of enforcing US law to the rest of the world! ROFL. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Where is debian-non-US

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 10:24:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:28:15PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > > > > Andras Lorincz writes: > > > Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US? > > > > Due to changes in US

Re: Where is debian-non-US

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:28:15PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > > Andras Lorincz writes: > > Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US? > > Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago. Yet another exaple of enforcing US law to the rest of the world!

Re: Where is debian-non-US

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 03:55:56PM -0500, Max Hyre wrote: > John Hasler wrote: > > > Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago. > >The changes removed restrictions preventing citizens of the land of > the free from sending strong crypto out of the country. > Actually, the spec

Re: Where is debian-non-US

Max Hyre writes: > Given the status of software patents, though, it might be time to revive > [non-US]. Then for similar reasons we'll need non-JP, non-DE, non-AU... -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Where is debian-non-US

John Hasler wrote: > Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago. The changes removed restrictions preventing citizens of the land of the free from sending strong crypto out of the country. Given the status of software patents, though, it might be time to revive it. --

Re: Where is debian-non-US

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/07 13:47, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 14:39 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:36:14PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: >>> It has been deprecated since Woody became oldstable, or exactly the same >>> time

Re: Where is debian-non-US

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/07 13:28, John Hasler wrote: > Andras Lorincz writes: >> Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US? > > Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago. Specifically, liberalizations made i

Re: Where is debian-non-US

On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 14:39 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:36:14PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: > > > > It has been deprecated since Woody became oldstable, or exactly the same > > time Sarge became stable. > > > I don't think it was deprecated. I think it just went

Re: Where is debian-non-US

Andras Lorincz writes: > Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US? Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Where is debian-non-US

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:36:14PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: > > It has been deprecated since Woody became oldstable, or exactly the same > time Sarge became stable. > I don't think it was deprecated. I think it just went away. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.

Re: Where is debian-non-US

On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 21:02 +0200, Andras Lorincz wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using testing and since a few days I get errors like > > /debian-non-US/dists/testing/non-US/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz: No > such file or directory. > > Has something changed recently? Where i

Where is debian-non-US

Hi, I'm using testing and since a few days I get errors like /debian-non-US/dists/testing/non-US/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz: No such file or directory. Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Re: Where did the unstable branch of the debian archives (ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US/) go?

/ftp.fr.debian.org for everything. I just checked the site > itself, > > and there is no unstable folder in > > ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists . I also tried > > ftp2.fr.debian.org, but got the same results. I randomly checked a > > german morror, and the unst

Re: Where did the unstable branch of the debian archives (ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US/) go?

On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 04:38:17AM -0700, Ibrahim Mubarak wrote: > Hi all, > > I am not sure I am posting in the right place, so please let me know if > it is so. Thanks. > > For a few days now, I noticed that the non-US packages on the mirrors I > use for apt/aptitude/synaptic are unreachable. I

Re: Where did the unstable branch of the debian archives (ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US/) go?

no unstable folder in > ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists . I also tried > ftp2.fr.debian.org, but got the same results. I randomly checked a > german morror, and the unstable branch is there. non-US has been removed as of the Sarge release. The United States relaxed the legal r

Re: Where did the unstable branch of the debian archives (ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US/) go?

Ibrahim Mubarak wrote: >For a few days now, I noticed that the non-US packages on the mirrors I >use for apt/aptitude/synaptic are unreachable. > > It's been discussed in several places, including this list over the past week or so (check the archives). Non_US is no longer needed or used. You sh

Where did the unstable branch of the debian archives (ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US/) go?

, and there is no unstable folder in ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists . I also tried ftp2.fr.debian.org, but got the same results. I randomly checked a german morror, and the unstable branch is there. What is going on? Who should know about this? Thanks, ib

Re: What happened to non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists/testing

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:36:25AM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Lee Braiden writes: > > Hmm. What happened? Did they automatically include non-us stuff on > > international servers, or something? > > The US relaxed it's regulations on the export of cryptography some years > ago, rendering non-us

Re: What happened to non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists/testing

Lee Braiden writes: > Hmm. What happened? Did they automatically include non-us stuff on > international servers, or something? The US relaxed it's regulations on the export of cryptography some years ago, rendering non-us obsolete. Everything that was in non-us has been moved to main. -- John

Re: What happened to non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists/testing

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:59:51PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote: > On Tuesday 07 Jun 2005 14:58, Florian Ernst wrote: > > non-US obsoleted, see > > >tml#s-non-us> > > Hmm. What happened? Did they automatically include non-

Re: What happened to non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists/testing

On Tuesday 07 Jun 2005 14:58, Florian Ernst wrote: > non-US obsoleted, see > tml#s-non-us> Hmm. What happened? Did they automatically include non-us stuff on international servers, or something? -- Lee. Please do no

Re: What happened to non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists/testing

Hello *, On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:52:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yesterday, my apt-get update failed: > > Failed to fetch > http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists/testing/non-US/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz > > 404 Not Found > > What happened

What happened to non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists/testing

Hello, Yesterday, my apt-get update failed: Failed to fetch http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists/testing/non-US/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz 404 Not Found What happened ? First victim of sarge getting stable ? cu Markus Grunwald Softwareentwicklung PRÜFTECHNIK Condition

/debian-non-US/dists/woody/Contents-*.gz

...hi all, what is happened with this file(s)? Only Contents-hurd-i386.gz and Contents-arm.gz are in ftp://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists/woody/non-US :-( bye MaXX

Re: debian non-us site

> > What happened to os.inf.tu-dresden.de ?? It's now called non-us.debian.org :). -- joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED] My spamfilter is so good, it correctly catches 90% of incoming spam, *including* all email from my PhD supervisor. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the w

debian non-us site

What happened to os.inf.tu-dresden.de ?? -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Where to put debian-non-US

Hi, I'm operating a non-us mirror on debian and the site served as a local NFS export point for anybody in my department wanting to install debian. All other subdirectories were good for the NFS install except non-US. May I know which is the appropriate place for it?? (I currently call it ./loca

Re: debian-non-us archive

On May 9, Camm Maguire wrote : Greetings! Are the source files for pgp and ssh no longer : distributable? The mirror at os.inf.tu-dresden.de has the permissions : on these files set so that they are no longer available via anonymous : ftp. ... yup, I fixed the permissions in the binary dirs, bu

debian-non-us archive

Greetings! Are the source files for pgp and ssh no longer distributable? The mirror at os.inf.tu-dresden.de has the permissions on these files set so that they are no longer available via anonymous ftp. Thanks! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Camm Maguire