Deephay wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I am wondering that if it is safe to using the testing distro (now
> Etch) as the server's OS.
> Any comment is appreciated very much.
> thx!
>
> Deepahy
Why would you want to use testing instead of stable for a server?
Servers are generally very simple crea
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:21:23PM +0800, Deephay wrote:
> I just want to know that how harmful it will be if I run testing on
> the server.
As others have said, it's advisable to use Stable if you're unsure.
If you find some package from Testing (or Unstable) that you absolutely
must have, you
Deephay wrote:
Greetings all,
I am wondering that if it is safe to using the testing distro (now
Etch) as the server's OS.
Any comment is appreciated very much.
thx!
Deepahy
If your server is going to be exposed to the Internet, it should be
Debian/stable. Security updates are made avail
thx all,
thx very much for all your suggesion.
Deephay
On 4/20/06, Star King of the Grape Trees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Deephay wrote:
> > Thx All.
> >
> > I just want to know that how harmful it will be if I run testing on the
> > server.
> > Now I basically decided to use the stable disto
Deephay wrote:
Thx All.
I just want to know that how harmful it will be if I run testing on the server.
Now I basically decided to use the stable disto as the server's OS.
BTW: If anyone have some comments still, they are appreciated.
Deephay
In my opinion, a server has very well defined task
Deephay wrote:
Thx All.
I just want to know that how harmful it will be if I run testing on the server.
Now I basically decided to use the stable disto as the server's OS.
BTW: If anyone have some comments still, they are appreciated.
Like others have mentioned, on a server, I'd stick with S
Thx All.
I just want to know that how harmful it will be if I run testing on the server.
Now I basically decided to use the stable disto as the server's OS.
BTW: If anyone have some comments still, they are appreciated.
Deephay
On 4/20/06, Naz Gassiep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peronally, I
Peronally, I have servers, and I would never ever run *any* Linux other
than Debian Stable. Using testing can be a problem, as upgrades don't
always "just work". Using Stable is better, as you can assume that
upgrading the system automatically will "just work".
The question you need to answer
Deephay wrote:
I am wondering that if it is safe to using the testing distro (now
Etch) as the server's OS.
It depends on your understanding of 'safe', and on your needs. I'm
running it on the mailservers because doing so has some advantages, but
ymmv.
GH
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Hal, thx very much for your comment!
Deephay
On 4/20/06, Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 20 April 2006 02:23, Deephay wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > I am wondering that if it is safe to using the testing distro (now
> > Etch) as the server's OS.
> > Any comment is apprec
On Thursday 20 April 2006 02:23, Deephay wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I am wondering that if it is safe to using the testing distro (now
> Etch) as the server's OS.
> Any comment is appreciated very much.
> thx!
>
> Deepahy
I have a small business and if my servers are down, I'm not making
money
Greetings all,
I am wondering that if it is safe to using the testing distro (now
Etch) as the server's OS.
Any comment is appreciated very much.
thx!
Deepahy
12 matches
Mail list logo