Ben Cornett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BC> A number of you have offhandedly remarked that you believe Debian
BC> to be technically superior to the RH distribution. I was
BC> wondering if anyone would care to elaborate on that a bit for me.
-- Debian packages only depend on other packages. AFAIC
On Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 03:03:13PM -0500, Ben Cornett wrote:
> A number of you have offhandedly remarked that you believe Debian to be
> technically superior to the RH distribution. I was wondering if anyone
> would care to elaborate on that a bit for me. Currently I am running
> RH5.2, but I am
In a nutshell,
RH has the easy install method, debian has the easy upgrade of individual
packages method (i.e., apt-get install package.deb.
Debian is also a bit more stable. I think, that the support in chat rooms
and mailing lists is far superior as well.
On the downside, sometimes packages a
A number of you have offhandedly remarked that you believe Debian to be
technically superior to the RH distribution. I was wondering if anyone
would care to elaborate on that a bit for me. Currently I am running
RH5.2, but I am thinking of switching over to Debian once the final
version of slink
4 matches
Mail list logo
