Hi,
I compile the kernel for many years, I optimize the kernel compile
process using the bdver1 gcc optimization option applying a patch to
"arch/x86/Makefile" in the Linux source tree path.
Sadly with the 6.1.55 things went wrong it freeze many time, the 6.1.52
is much more stable with nouv
call_usermodehelper_setup") {
printf("%s\n", $argv[0]$) }'
stap -ve 'probe kernel.function("call_usermodehelper_exec").return {
retval=$return; printf("%s\nretval:%d\n", $$return$, retval) }'
regards
hede
Am 20.09.2022 15:39, schrieb hede:
hi all.
hi all.
Am 19.09.2022 16:27, schrieb hede:
I need help getting module on-demand-loading working with a custom
kernel.
Additional information:
My problem seems less related to udev but more probably related the
kernel kmod subsystems!?
The kernel usually calls /sbin/modprobe if
Hi all.
I need help getting module on-demand-loading working with a custom
kernel.
Currently I'm running Debian 11 for x86_64 on a Chromebook in developer
mode directly via Coreboot/Depthcharge. Not having UEFI or classical
BIOS boot code means that the default Debian kernel doesn&#
On 2021-07-04 18:21, Brian wrote:
Definitely. Has gparted been mentioned?
The rest of the disk is LVM. Would I need to shrink that first before
gparted ?
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
On Sun 04 Jul 2021 at 10:26:26 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 03 Jul 2021 at 19:53:03 (+0100), mick crane wrote:
> > I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order.
> > What's the procedure for making a custom kernel?
> > Install linux headers
> &
On 2021-07-04 16:26, David Wright wrote:
On Sat 03 Jul 2021 at 19:53:03 (+0100), mick crane wrote:
I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order.
What's the procedure for making a custom kernel?
Install linux headers
change to a "build" directory
make menu-con
On Sat 03 Jul 2021 at 19:53:03 (+0100), mick crane wrote:
> I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order.
> What's the procedure for making a custom kernel?
> Install linux headers
> change to a "build" directory
> make menu-config
> ./config
mlnl wrote:
> 10. make deb-pkg LOCALVERSION=-nameN KDEB_PKGVERSION=$(make
> kernelversion)-1 (nameN e. g. v1)
I prefer bindeb-dpkg saves some overhead in zipping the source
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 1:26 PM The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-07-04 at 06:26, IL Ka wrote:
>
> >> thank you very much. Can I somehow load the current configuration
> >> so menuconfig shows what choices were made for current kernel ?
> >
> > zcat /proc/config.gz > .config
>
> AFAIK, Debian hasn't s
On 2021-07-04 at 06:26, IL Ka wrote:
>> thank you very much. Can I somehow load the current configuration
>> so menuconfig shows what choices were made for current kernel ?
>
> zcat /proc/config.gz > .config
AFAIK, Debian hasn't shipped kernels with /proc/config.gz enabled for
quite a few years
>
> thank you very much. Can I somehow load the current configuration so
> menuconfig shows what choices were made for current kernel ?
>
>
zcat /proc/config.gz > .config
Hi,
On 2021-07-04 2:42 a.m., mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-07-04 06:22, mlnl wrote:
>> Hi Mick,
>>
>> mick crane wrote:
>>
>>> I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order.
>>> What's the procedure for making a custom kernel
On 2021-07-04 06:22, mlnl wrote:
Hi Mick,
mick crane wrote:
I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order.
What's the procedure for making a custom kernel?
Do you mean a custom Debian or a vanilla kernel from kernel.org?
For a Debian kernel you can look at
Hi Mick,
mick crane wrote:
>I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order.
>What's the procedure for making a custom kernel?
Do you mean a custom Debian or a vanilla kernel from kernel.org?
For a Debian kernel you can look at
<https://kernel-team.pages.debian.ne
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 12:20 AM Anssi Saari wrote:
> mick crane writes:
>
> > I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order.
> > What's the procedure for making a custom kernel?
>
> I assume there are full instructions somewhere.
Here it is
http:
mick crane writes:
> I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order.
> What's the procedure for making a custom kernel?
> Install linux headers
> change to a "build" directory
> make menu-config
> ./configure
> make
> make dep
>
I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order.
What's the procedure for making a custom kernel?
Install linux headers
change to a "build" directory
make menu-config
./configure
make
make dep
make install
make clean
?
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:50:06 +0100
Okay, that makes more sense.
Thanks
-HP
deloptes wrote:
> HP Garcia wrote:
>
> > Is there a command to detect hardware for a custom kernel? I would
> > like to take advantages of the newer kernels.
>
> It is not clear what you
deloptes wrote on 01/11/17 09:50:
> HP Garcia wrote:
>
>> Is there a command to detect hardware for a custom kernel? I would like
>> to take advantages of the newer kernels.
>
> It is not clear what you want to achieve.
> Most probably your current kernel has alread
HP Garcia wrote:
> Is there a command to detect hardware for a custom kernel? I would like
> to take advantages of the newer kernels.
It is not clear what you want to achieve.
Most probably your current kernel has already detected the hardware for you.
Just take the config and base yo
Is there a command to detect hardware for a custom kernel? I would like
to take advantages of the newer kernels.
Thanks
--
HP Garcia, Photographer
www.HPGPhotography.com
OK, found make localmodconfig.
Looks like a much better starting point.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAOsGNSSUjy-+qe+sZ5WnM+Ex6f2GzF=rgsapjo5jim+r
On 8/18/14, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 09:48:50PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> I am using "make xconfig" (the kernel qt configurator).
>>
>> How is it that I cannot disable:
>> Network device support
>> -> Ethernet driver support
>> -> Broadcom devices
>> -> Broadcom QLogic
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 09:48:50PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I am using "make xconfig" (the kernel qt configurator).
>
> How is it that I cannot disable:
> Network device support
> -> Ethernet driver support
> -> Broadcom devices
> -> Broadcom QLogic NetXtremeII driver?
>
> I can only selec
I am using "make xconfig" (the kernel qt configurator).
How is it that I cannot disable:
Network device support
-> Ethernet driver support
-> Broadcom devices
-> Broadcom QLogic NetXtremeII driver?
I can only select it as a module, or permanently built into the kernel. It says:
Selected by: CNIC
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 03:03:33AM -0500, ken wrote:
> I've found cpuspeed to be buggy... the speed at which the cpu runs
> seems to have little to do with the conditions specified in the
> config file. Recent kernel upgrades have improved cpuspeed somewhat
> (without any changes to the config file
q stats: 2.30 GHz:5.20%, 2.00 GHz:0.14%, 1.80 GHz:0.16%, 1.60
GHz:0.20%, 1.40 GHz:0.28%, 1.20 GHz:0.44%, 1000 MHz:0.49%, 800 MHz:93.09%
(39552)
And then for the custom kernel I get:
cpufrequtils 008: cpufreq-info (C) Dominik Brodowski 2004-2009
Report errors and bugs to cpuf...@vger.kernel.org, p
Sean Alexandre:
>
> I can't figure out why it's faster. Everything I've checked is the same
> between
> the two kernels. If I boot to the Debian provided kernel the CPU runs at 800
> MHz, but if I boot to my custom kernel it runs at 1.8 GHz. (These are baselin
s at 800
MHz, but if I boot to my custom kernel it runs at 1.8 GHz. (These are baseline
speeds, after boot without running anything else.)
Here's what I've checked so far:
* Kernel versions are the same. The Debian version is 3.2.0-4-amd64 and the
version I got from kernel.org is 3.2.5
I've built my own kernel, but the CPU runs faster (hotter, more fan noise, etc.)
I can't figure out why it's faster. Everything I've checked is the same between
the two kernels. If I boot to the Debian provided kernel the CPU runs at 800
MHz, but if I boot to my custom kerne
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Curt Howland wrote:
> =
> Uninstalling modules from DKMS
> Attempting to install using DKMS
>
> Creating symlink /var/lib/dkms/vboxhost/4.2.8/source ->
> /usr/src/vboxhost-4.2.8
>
> DKMS: add completed.
> Failed to install using DKMS, attemptin
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 22:55 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Curt Howland wrote:
> > Also, VB was crashing my system quite reliably last time I had it
> > installed, and I just got a new CPU. Since I assume VB was accessing
> > some damaged part of my old CPU, I wanted to try VB before and after
> > the
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 09:22 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 22:55 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Curt Howland wrote:
> > > Also, VB was crashing my system quite reliably last time I had it
> > > installed, and I just got a new CPU. Since I assume VB was accessing
> > > some damaged
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 19:21 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Curt Howland wrote:
> > Good evening. Up-to-date Sid, 32 bit.
> >
> > I've been trying to install VirtualBox, both from the Sid main
> > archives and the Oracle
> > virtualbox-4.2_4.2.8-83876~Debian~wheezy_i386.deb package.
> >
> > Both
Curt Howland wrote:
> Also, VB was crashing my system quite reliably last time I had it
> installed, and I just got a new CPU. Since I assume VB was accessing
> some damaged part of my old CPU, I wanted to try VB before and after
> the CPU swap to get a before/and/after comparison.
I am sure you w
Curt Howland wrote:
Good evening. Up-to-date Sid, 32 bit.
I've been trying to install VirtualBox, both from the Sid main
archives and the Oracle
virtualbox-4.2_4.2.8-83876~Debian~wheezy_i386.deb package.
Both give the same error, that the kernel module cannot be built
because the kernel source
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/03/msg00691.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1363136054.1445.416.camel@archlinux
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 01:54 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/03/msg00691.html
PS:
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RESOLVED: Re: kernel-soure WAS:display issues
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 02:07:4
On 3/12/2013 7:30 PM, Curt Howland wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling
> wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity why are you not using KVM? It is better, faster,
>> and integrated with the kernel. virt-manager is more than capable tool
>> for provisioning VM's.
>
> Because I ha
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
> Just out of curiosity why are you not using KVM? It is better, faster,
> and integrated with the kernel. virt-manager is more than capable tool
> for provisioning VM's.
Because I have no experience with it. One must have a place to beg
Just out of curiosity why are you not using KVM? It is better, faster,
and integrated with the kernel. virt-manager is more than capable tool
for provisioning VM's.
On 13 March 2013 12:57, Curt Howland wrote:
> Good evening. Up-to-date Sid, 32 bit.
>
> I've been trying to install VirtualBox, both
Good evening. Up-to-date Sid, 32 bit.
I've been trying to install VirtualBox, both from the Sid main
archives and the Oracle
virtualbox-4.2_4.2.8-83876~Debian~wheezy_i386.deb package.
Both give the same error, that the kernel module cannot be built
because the kernel source tree cannot be found.
Mike McClain a écrit :
>
> VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb5" or unknown-block(0,0)
> Please append correct "root=" boot option; here are available partitions:
> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
>
> Note that there are no 'available partitions' liste
On 07/07/12 16:46, Mike McClain wrote:
Hi Dom,
Thanks for your suggestions and letting me know this is still possible.
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 04:56:10AM +0100, Dom wrote:
On 07/07/12 00:08, Mike McClain wrote:
Is anyone running a custom kernel without an initrd with udev?
Yes
On 07/07/12 18:49, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:53:27 -0400 (EDT), Dom wrote:
On 07/07/12 16:53, Stephen Powell wrote:
It's getting harder and harder to get along without an initrd these
days. Why is it so important to you not to use one? As others
have pointed out, using a UU
Hi Stephen,
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 11:53:58AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm
Thanks, I'll take a look at that.
Mike
--
Satisfied user of Linux since 1997.
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:53:27 -0400 (EDT), Dom wrote:
> On 07/07/12 16:53, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> It's getting harder and harder to get along without an initrd these
>> days. Why is it so important to you not to use one? As others
>> have pointed out, using a UUID or LABEL specification for the
Hi Dom,
Thanks for your suggestions and letting me know this is still possible.
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 04:56:10AM +0100, Dom wrote:
> On 07/07/12 00:08, Mike McClain wrote:
> > Is anyone running a custom kernel without an initrd with udev?
>
> Yes, I am. Although I be
ion; here are available partitions:
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
Note that there are no 'available partitions' listed though before I reach this
point the grub commandline will show that all partitions on both drives are
recognized by grub.
>
On 07/07/12 16:53, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:08:14 -0400 (EDT), Mike McClain wrote:
Is anyone running a custom kernel without an initrd with udev?
Any tips, pointers will be appreciated.
It's getting harder and harder to get along without an initrd these
days. Why
ed with
> the install. On doing that I discovered that the device files for
> the harddrive are created before the drive is mounted. Booting an
> 'Etch' partition I see that Squeeze's /dev/ is all but empty when
> Squeeze is not running which may have something to do
figured, built again for
>> several days now. No joy. I've spent hours Googling for any and
>> everybody's thoughts on the error: 'Kernel panic - not syncing:
>> VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)' with little luck.
What are the lines preceding the
he device files for
the harddrive are created before the drive is mounted. Booting an
'Etch' partition I see that Squeeze's /dev/ is all but empty when
Squeeze is not running which may have something to do with the
failure to mount the root partition.
Is anyone running a custom
eated before the drive is mounted. Booting an
'Etch' partition I see that Squeeze's /dev/ is all but empty when
Squeeze is not running which may have something to do with the
failure to mount the root partition.
Is anyone running a custom kernel without an initrd with
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:17:24 -0500, A E [Gmail] wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>>> OTOH, I've always thought that lower values for timer frequencies are
>>> better for servers...
>>
>> a faster timer inter
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:17:24 -0500, A E [Gmail] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> OTOH, I've always thought that lower values for timer frequencies are
>> better for servers...
>
> a faster timer interrupt, as a I understand, allows for a more precise
> and gra
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> root@v100:/usr/src/linux-2.6-2.6.32# dmesg | egrep -i 'eth|bond'
>
> (...)
>
> Bonding? I would first try to setup the ethernet cards separately and
> once you have checked they're working okay with no errors, proceed with
> bonding.
>
>>> Whe
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:05:41 -0500, A E [Gmail] wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:12:35 -0500, A E [Gmail] wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>>
>> Hi, please, no html :-(
>
> Ok, never heard of that one before, but I have removed Rich-Text
> composing opt
and sorry if this isn't the right forum but
> > feel free to tell me where to go if it isn't.
>
> (thanks for the warning. I'm removing the other list)
>
> > The question, I was experimenting with creating a custom kernel, lean by
> > removing a bunch of featur
)
> The question, I was experimenting with creating a custom kernel, lean by
> removing a bunch of features/modules from it, but seemed to have knocked
> out the networking from it...in some part. I know I removed only drivers
> and/or modules that had to do with WiFi and Wimax etc, but how di
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Dom wrote:
>> On 04/10/11 17:34, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> In menuconfig, "General setup" then "Initial RAM filesystem and RAM
>>> disk (initramfs/initrd) support".
>>
>> Which has nothing to do with swap fles.
>
> Thanks.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Dom wrote:
> On 04/10/11 17:34, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> In menuconfig, "General setup" then "Initial RAM filesystem and RAM
>> disk (initramfs/initrd) support".
>
> Which has nothing to do with swap fles.
Thanks. Somehow swap got turned into initramfs in my brain... I'm
On 04/10/11 17:34, Tom H wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
There probably is a kernel configuration option for enabling/disabling
swap file support. Make sure you have it set properly. I never
mess with it, but I seem to remember running across it during
kernel con
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> There probably is a kernel configuration option for enabling/disabling
> swap file support. Make sure you have it set properly. I never
> mess with it, but I seem to remember running across it during
> kernel configuration.
In menuconfig
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:14:11 -0500, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> Debian (Squeeze) runs with a blank fstab.
How is that?!
Mine is full of useful things, like swap mount point, partitions and all
that "useless" stuff ;-)
> I am not sure exactly where the magic is on that but when I upgrade my
> k
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:14:11 -0400 (EDT), Brian Sutherland wrote:
>
> Debian (Squeeze) runs with a blank fstab. I am not sure exactly where
> the magic is on that but when I upgrade my kernel and use "make-kpkg --initrd"
> to put it all together I lose my swap. So I know could add it to the fsta
Debian (Squeeze) runs with a blank fstab. I am not sure exactly where the magic
is on that but when I upgrade my kernel and use make-kpkg --initrd to put it
all together I lose my swap. So I know could add it to the fstab to make it
work but I am wondering what is set different in my kernel that
A E [Gmail] put forth on 4/8/2011 10:58 AM:
> #> time nice fakeroot make-kpkg --subarch=sun4u --arch_in_name
> --revision=2.6.32-5-Cust001 --initrd kernel_image
> The question is, if I allowed it to slap on the arch in name automatically
> and it ended up calling it 'sparc', does that mean it's c
Hello All,
I've made a first attempt at trying to change some config of the stock
kernel for squeeze on sparc64. Went through the instructions found somewhere
on the net and on the debian wiki, and have ended up with a kernel package.
Command used was:
#> time nice fakeroot make-kpkg --subarch=su
out at:
> http://kmuto.jp/debian/d-i/
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Tushar Joshi wrote:
> >
> > I've just bought a new Dell R410 and it seems the Broadcom ethernet and
> > the H700 raid card aren't supported with Lenny's CD netinst. I've
> &
:
>
> I've just bought a new Dell R410 and it seems the Broadcom ethernet and
> the H700 raid card aren't supported with Lenny's CD netinst. I've
> created a custom kernel but I wonder if anyone has any pointers on how
> to create an initrd image for this and put this on a
I've just bought a new Dell R410 and it seems the Broadcom ethernet and
the H700 raid card aren't supported with Lenny's CD netinst. I've
created a custom kernel but I wonder if anyone has any pointers on how
to create an initrd image for this and put this on a netinst CD. I&#
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 23:53:55 -0600
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
...
> Have you tried pressing "H" for Help, on each feature or feature class? Note
> what help tells you. In many/most cases Help will assist you in figuring out
> whether you need a given feature or not.
Many - certainly. Most, perhaps
On Sun December 27 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > I do have ecryptfs & a Private filesystem, but ecryptfs was under file
> > systems ( I think..) I did find that.
>
> Have you tried pressing "H" for Help, on each feature or feature class?
> Note what help tells you. In many/most cases Help will a
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/26/2009 5:32 AM:
> this DELL box is my first PC with SATA. When I opened it up a while back to
> add a 2nd HD, THAT is when I found out it was SATA, and my old drives
> wouldn't work! but I don't remember looking at the CDROM cables..
Sounds like the perfect time
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/26/2009 6:47 AM:
> On Fri December 25 2009, Celejar wrote:
>> Absolutely. I'm just warning you to be prepared for a lot of very
>> frustrating "why can't the kernel find my root filesystem?" and "why
>> has this piece of HW / SW suddenly stopped working".
>>
>
> ok
On Fri December 25 2009, Celejar wrote:
> Absolutely. I'm just warning you to be prepared for a lot of very
> frustrating "why can't the kernel find my root filesystem?" and "why
> has this piece of HW / SW suddenly stopped working".
yeah, found that one... something about can't boot from (0,0)..
On Sat December 26 2009, Celejar wrote:
> > kernel hacking??
>
> Various options that control the behavior of the kernel, for debugging,
> testing, troubleshooting, etc. You can generally ignore this section
> and turn things off, although there are some useful things there (Magic
> SysRq, various
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 07:47:10 -0500
Paul Cartwright wrote:
...
[Warning: I'm no expert, so take everything I write with a grain of
salt.]
> kernel hacking??
Various options that control the behavior of the kernel, for debugging,
testing, troubleshooting, etc. You can generally ignore this sect
On Fri December 25 2009, Celejar wrote:
> Absolutely. I'm just warning you to be prepared for a lot of very
> frustrating "why can't the kernel find my root filesystem?" and "why
> has this piece of HW / SW suddenly stopped working".
>
ok, so it gets deep in those menus...
network, device drivers
On Fri December 25 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> 18MB? Yikes! Am I reading that correctly? My latest custom kernel is:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root src 1.5M Dec 8 13:29
> linux-image-2.6.31.1_custom.greer.sata.1.3_i386.deb
ok, so I go through and delete stuff ( make menuconfig). When
On Fri December 25 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18548960 2009-12-25 05:58
> > linux-image-2.6.31.9_custom.1.0_i386.deb
>
> 18MB? Yikes! Am I reading that correctly? My latest custom kernel is:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root src 1.5M De
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/25/2009 6:56 PM:
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18548960 2009-12-25 05:58
> linux-image-2.6.31.9_custom.1.0_i386.deb
18MB? Yikes! Am I reading that correctly? My latest custom kernel is:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root src 1.5M Dec 8 13:29
linux
On Fri December 25 2009, Celejar wrote:
> > How about: build a kernel with everything as modules, boot it, look at
> > the output of lsmod, then build a kernel with (at least) those modules?
>
> Probably a good idea, but note that connecting kernel module names with
> the relevant kernel config opt
On Fri December 25 2009, Celejar wrote:
> Absolutely. I'm just warning you to be prepared for a lot of very
> frustrating "why can't the kernel find my root filesystem?" and "why
> has this piece of HW / SW suddenly stopped working".
right.. I get it..
>
> One thing I'd recommend, although I've
On Fri December 25 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> You've just passed the first milestone, and seem to be continuing down the
> right path in your kernel building journey. :)
after editing that file, and doing the steps, I now have my first custom
kernel:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18548
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 10:35:59 -0500
Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 09-12-25 09:04:42, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 05:07:55 -0500
> ...
> > > this is the "learning" part.. knowing what you need, what you MIGHT
> > > need, and what you don't have to have to make it work..
> >
> > Absolutely.
On 09-12-25 09:04:42, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 05:07:55 -0500
...
> > this is the "learning" part.. knowing what you need, what you MIGHT
> > need, and what you don't have to have to make it work..
>
> Absolutely. I'm just warning you to be prepared for a lot of very
> frustrating "w
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 05:07:55 -0500
Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Thu December 24 2009, Celejar wrote:
> > > relating to doing so. When compiling one's first custom kernel one
> > > should start with _ONLY_ the functionality one needs. Then build things
> >
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/25/2009 4:07 AM:
> this is the "learning" part.. knowing what you need, what you MIGHT need, and
> what you don't have to have to make it work..
You've just passed the first milestone, and seem to be continuing down the right
path in your kernel building journey.
On Thu December 24 2009, Celejar wrote:
> > relating to doing so. When compiling one's first custom kernel one
> > should start with _ONLY_ the functionality one needs. Then build things
> > up from there as you need more abilities from you kernel. ;)
>
> But I
On Thu December 24 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > make[1]: Leaving directory
> > `/home/pbc/Documents/software/linux-2.6.31.9/linux-2.6.31.9/Documentation
> >/lguest' make: *** [debian/stamp/build/kernel] Error 2
>
> http://cakebox.homeunix.net/wordpress/?p=100
THAT I can follow!
my googling didn'
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:53:31 -0600
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
...
> relating to doing so. When compiling one's first custom kernel one should
> start
> with _ONLY_ the functionality one needs. Then build things up from there as
> you
> need more abilities from you kernel.
If you don't actually plan on running this kernel/machine as a hypervisor/host
for guest operating systems, then in make menuconfig unselect any kernel options
relating to doing so. When compiling one's first custom kernel one should start
with _ONLY_ the functionality one needs. Then
On Tue December 22 2009, Celejar wrote:
> Exactly. And you can turn off all the sound card and video drivers
> except the one(s) you actually need, and the same for networking hw,
> etc.
so I was reading this:
http://www.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm
which is about the same..
I ran these comm
>
> Temporarily rename /lib/firmware/mts_edge.fw to something else (eg.
> /lib/firmware/mts_edge.fw.old) and reinstall 2.6.30
>
No, you can't just rename the file. The package installation information
is kept in the database.
Try "--force-overwrite" option to dpkg.
Jeffrey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Bernd Prager wrote:
Hi,
I have been building custom kernels for my system a while now.
Recently I run into trouble that I haven't experienced before:
I build my kernel with:
$ make menuconfig
$ make-kpkg clean
$ fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-custom kernel_image
kernel_header
On 2009-06-16 16:45 +0200, Bernd Prager wrote:
> I have been building custom kernels for my system a while now.
> Recently I run into trouble that I haven't experienced before:
>
> I build my kernel with:
> $ make menuconfig
> $ make-kpkg clean
> $ fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-
2009/6/16 Bernd Prager :
> Hi,
>
> I have been building custom kernels for my system a while now.
> Recently I run into trouble that I haven't experienced before:
>
> I build my kernel with:
> $ make menuconfig
> $ make-kpkg clean
> $ fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-custom kernel_i
1 - 100 of 378 matches
Mail list logo
