On Saturday 05 July 2003 5:09 am, Christophe Courtois wrote:
> Le Samedi 5 Juillet 2003 10:24, Marino Fernandez a déclamé :
> > Yes, that's what it seems. I had the same problem with 2.4.21... GCC
> > 2.95 and 3.2 work, but no 3.3.
>
From a practical standpoint (in other words... have I noticed any
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:49:05 +0200
Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tried to compile a 2.4.20 kernel with GCC 3.3 and failed.
> I searched through several list and the web to find more infos. I found
> some docs about GCC3.1 and its implemetation (wich isnt).
>
> Just to be
Le Samedi 5 Juillet 2003 10:24, Marino Fernandez a déclamé :
> Yes, that's what it seems. I had the same problem with 2.4.21... GCC
> 2.95 and 3.2 work, but no 3.3.
I compile with 2.95 ; is there a difference for a user with 3.2 ?
--
Christophe Courtois - Ostwald, Alsace, France
http://www.cou
On Saturday 05 July 2003 2:49 am, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tried to compile a 2.4.20 kernel with GCC 3.3 and failed.
> I searched through several list and the web to find more infos. I found
> some docs about GCC3.1 and its implemetation (wich isnt).
>
> Just to be sure: We still must us
Hi
I tried to compile a 2.4.20 kernel with GCC 3.3 and failed.
I searched through several list and the web to find more infos. I found some
docs about GCC3.1 and its implemetation (wich isnt).
Just to be sure: We still must use GCC 2.95 to compile the kernel, right?
cheers,
Raffaele
--
Raffael
5 matches
Mail list logo