Re: compiling sid kernel source 2.6.15 in sarge

2006-03-01 Thread L . V . Gandhi
On 3/1/06, Glenn Meehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been using 2.6.15 for about a week now. It's fantastic. Seems to > be faster than 2.6.8. I have scanning, sound, USB, cd burning, rsync, > nfs. All works well. I used the kernel from kernel.org. I didn't bother > with the ramdisk. Seems to

Re: compiling sid kernel source 2.6.15 in sarge

2006-03-01 Thread Glenn Meehan
Hiya LV, I have been using 2.6.15 for about a week now. It's fantastic. Seems to be faster than 2.6.8. I have scanning, sound, USB, cd burning, rsync, nfs. All works well. I used the kernel from kernel.org. I didn't bother with the ramdisk. Seems to be a waste of time. I followed the instructions

compiling sid kernel source 2.6.15 in sarge

2006-02-28 Thread L . V . Gandhi
I was using sid kernel source from my sid partition. When I was running sarge, I untarred sid kernel source 2.6.15 in /usr/src. Added bootsplash patch did oldconfig using sarge's config file from /boot/.and answered mostly all to defaults. I thought 2.6.15 will take only linux-image, I tried make-