On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 10:39:16PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote:
>
> I'm sure people are going to disagree with my assessment, claiming
> that dselect is user friendly, it's just that all the users are too
> stupid to use it. So maybe we need some good data.
dselect is user friendly, its just picky
Quoth Walter Tautz,
> I would slightly concur with your assessment of dselect but
> only in the sense that it lists simply too many packages. I
> am not sure, but perhaps it is possible to present the various
> software types in a less verbose manner. Sort of like the slrn
> news reader where on
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 12:02:39PM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Peak Allan wrote:
> > As a Debian newbie I have to say that the worst thing
> > about Debian was dselect. It seemed to be a confusing
> > morass. Once I got a workable system it was great,
> > and I was impressed
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Peak Allan wrote:
> As a Debian newbie I have to say that the worst thing
> about Debian was dselect. It seemed to be a confusing
> morass. Once I got a workable system it was great,
> and I was impressed by how easy it was to go from
> slink to potato, but getting started
4 matches
Mail list logo
