Re: Testing update: can't resolve dependencies with epiphany packages

Quoting Johan Grönqvist: > The description of the epiphany-gecko in squeeze > () says: > > "This package has been made obsolete by epiphany-browser 2.28.0, and > is safe to remove. " > > So just uninstalling epiphany-gecko and upgrading the rest

Re: Testing update: can't resolve dependencies with epiphany packages

Matteo Riva skrev: aptitude dist-upgrade gives me this: The following packages have unmet dependencies: epiphany-browser: Conflicts: epiphany-gecko but 2.26.3-2 is installed and it is kept back. epiphany-gecko: Depends: epiphany-browser-data (< 2.27) but 2.29.3-1 is to be installed. The fo

Testing update: can't resolve dependencies with epiphany packages

aptitude dist-upgrade gives me this: The following packages have unmet dependencies: epiphany-browser: Conflicts: epiphany-gecko but 2.26.3-2 is installed and it is kept back. epiphany-gecko: Depends: epiphany-browser-data (< 2.27) but 2.29.3-1 is to be installed. The following actions will

PROGRESS Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On 5/8/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 05:18:45PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Does it help defining in /etc/hosts the http hosts of your sources.list ? > > > > I can try that, but I've never done that before. > > well, try it, it is not diffico

Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 05:18:45PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Does it help defining in /etc/hosts the http hosts of your sources.list ? > > I can try that, but I've never done that before. well, try it, it is not difficoult. I am not assuring that this will solve the problem, I am saying

Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On 5/7/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:46:23PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On 5/6/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > strace -f -o /tmp/apt-get.log apt-get update > > http://wa9als.com/apt-get.log > > In this strace I

Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:46:23PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 5/6/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > strace -f -o /tmp/apt-get.log apt-get update > http://wa9als.com/apt-get.log In this strace I am not able to see any _obvious_ cause for your error (such as strang

Re: Re: Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On 5/6/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:11:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > strace -f -o /tmp/apt-get.log apt-get update > > Any other ideas? - John > > yes, post (or, better, make it avilable on a web server) the file > /tmp/apt-get.log whe

Re: Re: Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:11:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > strace -f -o /tmp/apt-get.log apt-get update > Any other ideas? - John yes, post (or, better, make it avilable on a web server) the file /tmp/apt-get.log where strace has put its debug information. Moreover, what happened whe

Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:34:56AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > getent hosts ftp.us.debian.org > > getent hosts security.debian.org > > getent hosts www.google.com > > getent hosts www.wikipedia.org > > Those return the expected results! > > The problem seems to be specific to apt-get an

Re: Re: Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On 5/5/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On 5/5/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> then check apt configuration files in /etc/apt/ and subdirectories > >> (proxy or other unusual configuration settings?

Re: Re: Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

> * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On 5/5/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> then check apt configuration files in /etc/apt/ and subdirectories >> (proxy or other unusual configuration settings? corrupted files?) > >I don't see any problems there. But it semm

Re: Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On 5/5/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >The problem seems to be specific to apt-get and aptitude. > > then check apt configuration files in /etc/apt/ and subdirectories > (proxy or other unusual configuration settings? cor

Re: Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

> * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >The problem seems to be specific to apt-get and aptitude. then check apt configuration files in /etc/apt/ and subdirectories (proxy or other unusual configuration settings? corrupted files?) And post the complete and exact outpt of apt-get /

Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 07:49:59AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On a recently restored etch server, I can't apt-get update because it > can't resolve anything in my sources.list, e.g. ftp.us.debian.org. > Right after I did a fresh etch install, update worked fine, but now &

Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On 5/5/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On a recently restored etch server, I can't apt-get update because it > >can't resolve anything in my sources.list, e.g. ftp.us

Re: Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

> * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On a recently restored etch server, I can't apt-get update because it >can't resolve anything in my sources.list, e.g. ftp.us.debian.org. (1) check the correctness of /etc/resolv.conf (2) correct /etc/re

Can't resolve ftp.us.debian.org

On a recently restored etch server, I can't apt-get update because it can't resolve anything in my sources.list, e.g. ftp.us.debian.org. Right after I did a fresh etch install, update worked fine, but now after restoring my previous files, it doesn't. If I try to INSTALL a pac

Re: exim4 on sarge can't resolve hosts

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes I'm building a Sarge machine to replace a Woody, and I can't persuade exim4 to do host lookups. All attempts at sending outgoing mail fail with: R=dnslookup defer (-1): host lookup did not complete. Running exim4 -d -bt says that DN

exim4 on sarge can't resolve hosts

I'm building a Sarge machine to replace a Woody, and I can't persuade exim4 to do host lookups. All attempts at sending outgoing mail fail with: R=dnslookup defer (-1): host lookup did not complete. Running exim4 -d -bt says that DNS lookup of abc.de (MX) gave TRY_AGAIN. All other programs (as f

Can't resolve DNS after potato to woody upgrade

I tried an upgrade from potato 2.2r3 to woody and all seemed to go well except that after connecting to my ISP with ppp via phone dialup I can't resolve any names. This use to work fine under potato. I can ping the numerical addresses fine, but for example a ping to debian.org fails. I

fetchmail can't resolve (some) domains

debs, my fetchmail can't resolve some domains from this list. (then i have to use netscape's mail client to "clear" the pop timeout "jam.") how should i handle this situation? ia, t. bentley taylor. //

Re: can't resolve names, ipchains or dns problem

El Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:59:26AM +0100, Albrecht Frank dijo: -| Nick wrote: -| > -| > Hi list, -| > -| > I have an internal network setup behind linux on a single static IP -| > I am having problem reolving names but can ping IP's numericaly. -| > -| > I set up dhcp to allocate 192.168.1.0/24

Re: can't resolve names, ipchains or dns problem

Nick wrote: > > Hi list, > > I have an internal network setup behind linux on a single static IP > I am having problem reolving names but can ping IP's numericaly. > > I set up dhcp to allocate 192.168.1.0/24 throught the internal network > Then I setup ipchains very basic, just to get it all go

Re: can't resolve names, ipchains or dns problem

Nick wrote: > > Hi list, > > I have an internal network setup behind linux on a single static IP > I am having problem reolving names but can ping IP's numericaly. > > I set up dhcp to allocate 192.168.1.0/24 throught the internal network > Then I setup ipchains very basic, just to get it all go

Re: can't resolve names, ipchains or dns problem

hi nic if yu can ping using the ip#... just add your "dns server ip#" into /etc/resolv.conf c ya alvin On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Nick wrote: > Hi list, > > I have an internal network setup behind linux on a single static IP > I am having problem reolving names but can ping IP's numericaly. > > I

can't resolve names, ipchains or dns problem

Hi list, I have an internal network setup behind linux on a single static IP I am having problem reolving names but can ping IP's numericaly. I set up dhcp to allocate 192.168.1.0/24 throught the internal network Then I setup ipchains very basic, just to get it all going ipchains -P forward DENY

Re: Re: still can't resolve...

On 08-Oct-99 Ben Lutgens wrote: > Next I would tail -f some various log files, hell try em all while you > attempt > to get some name service. I must say that I am intruiged what may be the > cause. What version of bind are you running. Did you check bugs.debian.org > for > a possible bug in there

Re: Re: still can't resolve...

On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 11:58:31AM -0600, tf wrote: > which is unchanged from when everything worked right. > ah, so that I might avoid sounding stupid, how may I describe what's > happening>to me? can't connect to the name server? > (nslookup reported that... plus "default servers are unavailab

Re: still can't resolve...

tf wrote: >Hey guys, > >I'm still having problems with resolving. I've tried a few things, >but none of them solved the problem. So. Anyone have any more >ideas ?(thanks Pollywog for the input) > >I can access websites by ip address, but no other way. One day I >could use DNS,

Re: still can't resolve...

have you put your ISP's nameserver(s) in /etc/resolv.conf? That's usually the first thing to do. if you dun know them, call them and beat them for IPs. bryan. tried to save myself but myself keeps slipping away. - nin. On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, tf wrote: > Hey guys, > > I'm still having problems wi

Re: still can't resolve...

On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 11:13:09AM -0600, tf wrote: > Hey guys, > > I'm still having problems with resolving. I've tried a few things, > but none of them solved the problem. So. Anyone have any more > ideas ?(thanks Pollywog for the input) > > I can access websites by ip address, but no other

still can't resolve...

Hey guys, I'm still having problems with resolving. I've tried a few things, but none of them solved the problem. So. Anyone have any more ideas ?(thanks Pollywog for the input) I can access websites by ip address, but no other way. One day I could use DNS, the next I could not. This sure i

RE: can't resolve...

On 05-Oct-99 tf wrote: > Hey guys, > > I seem to have lost my ablity to resolve. I attempted without > success to install the web server xitami. Don't know if that had > anything to do with it, but now, when I connect, neither netscape > nor lynx can find any site unless I specify the ip addres

can't resolve...

Hey guys, I seem to have lost my ablity to resolve. I attempted without success to install the web server xitami. Don't know if that had anything to do with it, but now, when I connect, neither netscape nor lynx can find any site unless I specify the ip address. Don't suppose anyone knows what

Can't resolve host names _inside_ firewall!?

Hi, After figuring out that my dhcpcd problems were due to a corrupted file in /var/run/, I now find I can't resolve hostnames/addresses _inside_ our firewall (it's fine for sites outside on the internet). I know littela botu networking so am not sure where the problem is, but u

[Debian] tar => can't resolve symbol 'mkfifo' ?

filesystem on the second PC and untar the big tarfile I get the following (approx!) error when untarring the /dev directory: /cdrom/bin/tar: Can't resolve symbol 'mkfifo' (or something like that) Any idea how to solve this? Nico -- -- Nico De Ranter Sony Service Ce

Re: Netscape 4.03 can't resolve symbol...

Toth Laszlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I use netscape communicator 4.03. When I start it I get a lot of message, > like this: > /usr/lib/netscape/netscape: can't resolve symbol 'JS_GetFramePC' Seems as if netscape isn´t able to find a library. Have a lo

Netscape 4.03 can't resolve symbol...

Hi! I use netscape communicator 4.03. When I start it I get a lot of message, like this: /usr/lib/netscape/netscape: can't resolve symbol 'JS_GetFramePC' I used debian package to install it. Any suggestion? Thanks in advance Corleone -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILI

xinit: can't resolve symbol '...'

How can I fix this error? ... it only happens when I type startx or xinit, I can start X w/ just X # startx xinit: can't resolve symbol '_Xglobal_lock' xinit: can't resolve symbol '_XUnlockMutex_fn' xinit: can't resolve symbol '_XLockMutex_fn' -Pa

montage: can't resolve symbol 'compress'

1> dpkg -S montage imagemagick: /usr/X11R6/bin/montage 1> dpkg -l imagemagick ii imagemagick 3.8.9-1 1> ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/montage libMagick.so.3.8 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libMagick.so.3.8 (0x4000b000) 3.8.9 libdf.so.4.0 => /usr/lib/libdf.so.4.0 (0x4011f000)

Re: LD_PRELOAD=lib using ldopen: can't resolve symbol '_dl_open'

.0 -fPIC libfoo.c -ldl > > $ export LD_PRELOAD=./libfoo.so.0.0 > $ bash > bash: can't resolve symbol '_dl_open' > bash: can't resolve symbol '_dl_close' > bash: can't resolve symbol '_dl_catch_error' Hopefully, this is caused by the nice mix of

LD_PRELOAD=lib using ldopen: can't resolve symbol '_dl_open'

e = dlopen("/lib/libc.so.6", RTLD_LAZY); dlclose(handle); } $ gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libfoo.so.0 -o libfoo.so.0.0 -fPIC libfoo.c -ldl $ export LD_PRELOAD=./libfoo.so.0.0 $ bash bash: can't resolve symbol '_dl_open' bash: can't resolve symbol '_dl_close' ba

Re: can't resolve symbol 'llseek'

Juhani Luhtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm probably missing the obvious here but could someone help me out. No, it's a bug with the boot disks you're using (I *assume* you're running this off a boot disk, since that's the only context I've heard of this error occurring). They contain a str

can't resolve symbol 'llseek'

I'm probably missing the obvious here but could someone help me out. I'm trying to install Debian 1.1 on a Pentium 200 MHz Endeavor motherboard 64MB RAM Adaptec 2940 SCSI 2 Fujitsu 9GB SCSI-harddrive The thing here what I suspect is --a quote from Large Disk mini-HOWTO - If you are not

Re: Problem: XEmacs(19.14.1) can't resolve symbol 'xbitmap'

t start. I only got six lines showing: > > xemacs: can't resolve symbol 'xbitmap' > > The System is "pure" Debian 1.1.9 (upgraded today from mirror feivel in > Aachen, Germany, X11 with SVGA-Server is running). > > Any suggestions how to fix it ? >

Problem: XEmacs(19.14.1) can't resolve symbol 'xbitmap'

emacs: can't resolve symbol 'xbitmap' The System is "pure" Debian 1.1.9 (upgraded today from mirror feivel in Aachen, Germany, X11 with SVGA-Server is running). Any suggestions how to fix it ? Dirk