Re: bug and gnupg

2002-05-18 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:44:06AM -0300, Marcelo Leal wrote: > Hello, > > Anybody knows about one popper that do authentication in mysql server, > or pam, and works with maildir? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$]apt-cache search maildir pop3 courier-pop - POP3 daemon with PAM and Maildir support If you

Re: bug and gnupg

2002-05-16 Thread Marcelo Leal
Hello, Anybody knows about one popper that do authentication in mysql server, or pam, and works with maildir? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bug and gnupg

2002-05-16 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 16 May 2002, dman wrote: > Is the reason good or not? I think you're having trouble because > you're encoding mechanism puts that > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > header above your message. As a result the psuedo-h

Re: bug and gnupg

2002-05-16 Thread dman
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:24:57AM -0700, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | Hash: SHA1 | | Is there any good reason why you can't sign submissions to BTS with | gnupg using bug? Is the reason good or not? I think you're having trouble because you're encoding mech

bug and gnupg

2002-05-16 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there any good reason why you can't sign submissions to BTS with gnupg using bug? Would this be a good feature request? - -- Baloo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE847MsNtWkM9Ny9xURAnDrAJ0WwlG8Y5onViRwPgw8