Re: best practice to use newer cpan modules on squeeze

2011-04-25 Thread Jim Green
On 20 April 2011 03:30, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > On 04/20/2011 05:55 AM, Jim Green wrote: >> >> Hello! >> in squeeze most perl modules are not up-to-date. for example >> libmoose-perl. >> >> In this case I include the sid repo and attempt to upgrade to sid >> version of libmoose but a hell of de

Re: best practice to use newer cpan modules on squeeze

2011-04-20 Thread Leonardo Ruoso
2011/4/20 Jim Green > Hello! > what should be the best practice here right now? I use cpan command to > install some modules that are not available in debian. but how about > those not up-to-date ones? > What about using locallib+cpan or a chrooted+(cpan|sid) enviromment for your perl applicatio

Re: best practice to use newer cpan modules on squeeze

2011-04-20 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
On 04/20/2011 05:55 AM, Jim Green wrote: Hello! in squeeze most perl modules are not up-to-date. for example libmoose-perl. In this case I include the sid repo and attempt to upgrade to sid version of libmoose but a hell of dependency begins. I am afraid if insist on upgrading this module, lots

Re: best practice to use newer cpan modules on squeeze

2011-04-20 Thread adris
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 19.04.2011, 23:55 -0400 schrieb Jim Green: > what should be the best practice here right now? I use cpan command to > install some modules that are not available in debian. but how about > those not up-to-date ones? I'm using CPAN at work and at home whenever a module is requ

best practice to use newer cpan modules on squeeze

2011-04-19 Thread Jim Green
Hello! in squeeze most perl modules are not up-to-date. for example libmoose-perl. In this case I include the sid repo and attempt to upgrade to sid version of libmoose but a hell of dependency begins. I am afraid if insist on upgrading this module, lots of perl core module/perl would be upgraded