Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)

2011-02-13 Thread Bernard
I am adding below a few more details to my last post, especially since I carried a few more tests : Bernard wrote: Roger Leigh wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:28:22AM +0100, Bernard wrote: Roger Leigh wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On

Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)

2011-02-12 Thread Bernard
Roger Leigh wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:28:22AM +0100, Bernard wrote: Roger Leigh wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file

Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)

2011-02-12 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:28:22AM +0100, Bernard wrote: > Roger Leigh wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: > >>On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: > >> > >>...snip... > >>>If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as > >>>follows: >

Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)

2011-02-12 Thread Bernard
Roger Leigh wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same printing result (p

Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)

2011-02-12 Thread Bernard
Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same printing result (poor quality, black and white) ...snip... If I'm understanding correc

Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)

2011-02-12 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 02/12/2011 04:11 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same pr

Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)

2011-02-12 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: > On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: > > ...snip... > >If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as > >follows: > > > >lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps > > > >I get exactly the same printing result (poor qua

Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)

2011-02-12 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same printing result (poor quality, black and white) ...snip... If I'm understanding correctly what you've written,

bad surprise using ghostview (gv)

2011-02-12 Thread Bernard
Hi to Everyone, I have quite often used 'gv' (ghostview) up to about a year and a half ago or so. I displayed ps files with it, and then printed them. To be more precise, the ps files were ancestry charts generated by a genealogy software called 'lifelines'. Everything went OK at that time.