Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
...
> - install needed packages you uninstalled in previous step. In this
> step Debian will install packages from testing and you probably won't
> have problems.
>
> Good luck!
what i would do before anything else is create a new
partition with plenty of space and
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 13:27, Amn wrote:
> What a mess I got myself into.
Hi, here is some more background explanation about this situation.
https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian
working properly, so I would
like to go back to stable source packages only. How can I do that?
I can think of two possible approaches, both of which come with
downsides.
Approach 1:
1a. Identify all of the packages for which you've installed a version
from sid.
1b. Identify the avai
On 11/23/22 22:11, Amn wrote:
Hi folks, I thought it would be a good idea to install the sid packages,
but a lot of things are not working properly, so I would like to go back
to stable source packages only. How can I do that?
As other users said there is not reliable way to downgrade your
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:11:10 -0500
Amn wrote:
> Hi folks, I thought it would be a good idea to install the sid
> packages, but a lot of things are not working properly, so I would
> like to go back to stable source packages only. How can I do that?
Back up and re-install Bullseye. Do
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:11:10PM -0500, Amn wrote:
> Hi folks, I thought it would be a good idea to install the sid packages, but
> a lot of things are not working properly, so I would like to go back to
> stable source packages only. How can I do that?
>
> Thanks!!
>
On 2022-11-23 at 15:11, Amn wrote:
> Hi folks, I thought it would be a good idea to install the sid
> packages, but a lot of things are not working properly, so I would
> like to go back to stable source packages only. How can I do that?
I can think of two possible approaches, both of w
Hi folks, I thought it would be a good idea to install the sid packages,
but a lot of things are not working properly, so I would like to go back
to stable source packages only. How can I do that?
Thanks!!
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:53:52PM +, michael wrote:
> I can give that a try but anybody else have any suggestions? (I've
> removed some packages I'd installed under sid so now it's probably
> not as clean/obvious as above suggests)...
>
> I guess I could remove lots of things and then se
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:53:52PM +, michael wrote:
> I can give that a try but anybody else have any suggestions? (I've
> removed some packages I'd installed under sid so now it's probably
> not as clean/obvious as above suggests)...
Yes, but beware changes to /etc that may not be back
On 31 Oct 2007, at 14:11, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:26:04AM +, michael wrote:
Folks, I made a cuckoo (mess up) - I had installed Etch from netinst
and done the upgrades. That was a while ago. Last night I decided I
wanted gnomad2 from unstable so amended my /etc/ap
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 09:46 +0530, H S Rai wrote:
> What is the way to go back to stable version, if mess has
> been created using apt-get for unstable and experimental
> vesrsion?
Thar be fierce fire breathing Dragons in that direction!
But you can do it, if and only if you know
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 09:51:42AM -0400, Rich Johnson wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2006, at 5:53 AM, Dave Ewart wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, 15.07.2006 at 01:00 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >>
> >>That is not exactly supported. Especially since there are *huge*
> >>differences between stable and uns
On Jul 15, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Arafangion wrote:
H S Rai wrote:
What is the way to go back to stable version, if mess has been
created
using apt-get for unstable and experimental vesrsion?
With assistance from dpkg --get-selections > selections && vim
selections && dp
H S Rai wrote:
What is the way to go back to stable version, if mess has been created
using apt-get for unstable and experimental vesrsion?
Reinstall. Start on an install script that keeps a record of what you
usually install, because there is a huge difference between what you see
in dpkg
H S Rai wrote:
> What is the way to go back to stable version, if mess has been created
> using apt-get for unstable and experimental vesrsion?
>
With assistance from dpkg --get-selections > selections && vim
selections && dpkg --set-selections < selections; I
On Jul 15, 2006, at 5:53 AM, Dave Ewart wrote:
On Saturday, 15.07.2006 at 01:00 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
That is not exactly supported. Especially since there are *huge*
differences between stable and unstable. Gnome has been upgraded
twice,
XFree86 was replaced by X.org. Those t
On Saturday, 15.07.2006 at 01:00 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> H S Rai wrote:
> > What is the way to go back to stable version, if mess has been created
> > using apt-get for unstable and experimental vesrsion?
> >
>
> That is not exactly supported. Espec
H S Rai wrote:
> What is the way to go back to stable version, if mess has been created
> using apt-get for unstable and experimental vesrsion?
>
That is not exactly supported. Especially since there are *huge*
differences between stable and unstable. Gnome has been upgraded twice,
XF
What is the way to go back to stable version, if mess has
been created using apt-get for unstable and experimental
vesrsion?
--
H.S.Rai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"J F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I decided to let aptitude update all my packages using the F10 menu
> and also told it to save disk space by getting rid of unused
> packages.
A good idea to do occasionally.
> aptitude deleted konqueror, so is there any way get it
dircha wrote:
> J F wrote:
>
>> Tracking it down further, it looks like aptitude
>> or apt is broken.
>> Aptitude says kdelibs4 conficts with kdelibs3 (<4:3.0.0 )
>>
>> Looking at what versions of kdelibs3 are
>> pending installation I see:
>> 4:2.2.2-13.woody.9
>> 4:2.2.2-13.woody.8
>> Isn't 4:2
J F wrote:
Tracking it down further, it looks like aptitude
or apt is broken.
Aptitude says
kdelibs4 conficts with kdelibs3 (<4:3.0.0 )
Looking at what versions of kdelibs3 are
pending installation I see:
4:2.2.2-13.woody.9
4:2.2.2-13.woody.8
Isn't 4:2.2.2-woody.8 < 4:3.0.0.0 ???
Maybe I'm not u
04/09, J F < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: J F [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:45:13 -0400
Subject: aptitude deleted konqueror, any way get it back or go back to stable?
I decided to let aptitude update all my packagesusing the F10 menu and also
I decided to let aptitude update all my packages
using the F10 menu and also told it to save disk
space by getting rid of unused packages.
aptitude deleted konqueror, so is there any way get it back or go back to stable?
It also deleted kde which has me afraid to
turn the power off on my
Knud =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8rensen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"David B. Harris" wrote:
>> To quote Knud Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> # apt-get got over 40 packets to install including X windows 4.0
>>
>> Not surprising. gnome-db is even now developmental software; it would
>> require lots of ne
To quote Knud Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# That what i have tried to but some of the packets
# pre or post remove scripts fails!
#
# So, is the any way to remove a packet without running them. ?
Not that I know of, off the top of my head. 'man dpkg' to check for
sure.
Dave
"David B. Harris" wrote:
>
> To quote Knud Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> # apt-get got over 40 packets to install including X windows 4.0
>
> Not surprising. gnome-db is even now developmental software; it would
> require lots of new GNOME stuff :
>
> # 1) So, How do I return to stable ??
>
>
To quote Knud Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# apt-get got over 40 packets to install including X windows 4.0
Not surprising. gnome-db is even now developmental software; it would
require lots of new GNOME stuff :
# 1) So, How do I return to stable ??
You remove each and every one of those 40 pac
Hi I have a problem.
I usually run stable, but some hours ago i needed a db front-end.
So, I change to unstable and did.
apt-get update
apt-get install gnome-db
apt-get got over 40 packets to install including X windows 4.0
The installation failed and now I am left with a broken system.
1) So,
nel) with 'frozen' loaded
> and can't get my compiled kernel, 2.2.14 to talk to the internet.
>
> I want to go back to 'stable' so that when I install 2.2.x so that the
> kernel recognises the dual processors and ethernet connection is up.
>
> Is there an
en' loaded
> and can't get my compiled kernel, 2.2.14 to talk to the internet.
>
> I want to go back to 'stable' so that when I install 2.2.x so that the
> kernel recognises the dual processors and ethernet connection is up.
>
> Is there any way I can erase _all_
e internet.
I want to go back to 'stable' so that when I install 2.2.x so that the
kernel recognises the dual processors and ethernet connection is up.
Is there any way I can erase _all_ the current 'frozen' packages and
install 'stable' using dselect or apt-get.
Thanks
Rajesh
33 matches
Mail list logo
