On 08.08.06 08:44, Mike Polyakov wrote:
> I guess I missed the fact that 'at' still worked with non graphical
> applications, and the above solution for X applications now works too!
> I wonder why the DISPLAY is not set while 'at' executes, I thought it
> inherited environment of the current shell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ > at 0720
warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh
at> DISPLAY=:0.0 gvim
at>
job 125 at Tue Aug 8 07:20:00 2006
I guess I missed the fact that 'at' still worked with non graphical
applications, and the above solution for X applications now works too!
I wonder why th
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:12:48AM +0200, Frank Blendinger wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 02:08:18PM -0400, Mike Polyakov wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
> > $ at 14:00
> > warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh
> > at> gvim
> > at>
> > job 21 at Mon Aug 7 14:00:00 2006
>
> I guess gv
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 02:08:18PM -0400, Mike Polyakov wrote:
> Yes, the job shows up when I run "atq". I also checked the syslog file
> and it doesn't seem to contain anything relevant to "at" command. Here
> is output from my shell:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
> $ date
> Mon Aug 7 13:59:11 EDT 200
Yes, the job shows up when I run "atq". I also checked the syslog file
and it doesn't seem to contain anything relevant to "at" command. Here
is output from my shell:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$ date
Mon Aug 7 13:59:11 EDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$ at 14:00
warning: commands will be executed using /
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 22:25:07 -0400, Mike Polyakov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> My 'at' command stopped worked after kernel upgrade. Nothing seems to
> be executing at the specified time. I tried to do it as root and still
> no results. I checked that my atd daemon is running and that
> /etc/at.deny
Hi everyone,
My 'at' command stopped worked after kernel upgrade. Nothing seems to
be executing at the specified time. I tried to do it as root and still
no results. I checked that my atd daemon is running and that
/etc/at.deny does not contain users running 'at'. Does anybody know
why its not wor
7 matches
Mail list logo