Re: unfriendly function from aptitude(hold and upgrade)

2011-09-11 Thread spp mg
2011/8/30 Camaleón : > On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:46:58 +0800, sppmg wrote: > >> I found a unfriendly function from aptitude(0.6.3-4). >> >> state: >> I hold a package,and this package in the upgradable too. >> >> now I upgrade by command ,I don't upgrade this package. But,If I upgrade >> by ncurses (m

Re: unfriendly function from aptitude(hold and upgrade)

2011-08-30 Thread Camaleón
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:46:58 +0800, sppmg wrote: > I found a unfriendly function from aptitude(0.6.3-4). > > state: > I hold a package,and this package in the upgradable too. > > now I upgrade by command ,I don't upgrade this package. But,If I upgrade > by ncurses (move point to upgradable and p

unfriendly function from aptitude(hold and upgrade)

2011-08-26 Thread sppmg
Hi all. I found a unfriendly function from aptitude(0.6.3-4). state: I hold a package,and this package in the upgradable too. now I upgrade by command ,I don't upgrade this package. But,If I upgrade by ncurses (move point to upgradable and press "+" ) ,I will upgrade this package. Should I s

Re: aptitude hold

2006-10-07 Thread hendrik
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 10:44:59AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:09:46PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote: > > > On (06/10/06 10:33), Enrique Morfin wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > if i hold some packages, how can i unhold them? > > > > > >

Re: aptitude hold

2006-10-07 Thread marc
Enrique Morfin said... > Hi! > > if i hold some packages, how can i unhold them? $ aptitude unhold -- Best, Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: aptitude hold

2006-10-07 Thread Andrei Popescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:09:46PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote: > > On (06/10/06 10:33), Enrique Morfin wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > if i hold some packages, how can i unhold them? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > HIghlight the package and press '+' > > Doesn't this reques

Re: aptitude hold

2006-10-06 Thread Pollywog
On Friday 06 October 2006 21:36, Pollywog wrote: > > dpkg --get-selections > package.list > > Then I open the resulting package.list file in a text editor and change > the "hold" status on the desired packages, save the file and close it. > > Next as root: > > dpkg --set-selections < package.list

Re: aptitude hold

2006-10-06 Thread Pollywog
On Friday 06 October 2006 21:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:09:46PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote: > > On (06/10/06 10:33), Enrique Morfin wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > if i hold some packages, how can i unhold them? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > HIghlight the package and press

Re: aptitude hold

2006-10-06 Thread hendrik
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:09:46PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote: > On (06/10/06 10:33), Enrique Morfin wrote: > > Hi! > > > > if i hold some packages, how can i unhold them? > > > > Thanks. > > HIghlight the package and press '+' Doesn't this request they be installed? That's not the same as un

Re: aptitude hold

2006-10-06 Thread Clive Menzies
On (06/10/06 10:33), Enrique Morfin wrote: > Hi! > > if i hold some packages, how can i unhold them? > > Thanks. HIghlight the package and press '+' Regards Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

aptitude hold

2006-10-06 Thread Enrique Morfin
Hi! if i hold some packages, how can i unhold them? Thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: Comparison of aptitude hold and pinning?

2006-06-19 Thread Adam Funk
On 2006-05-26, Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As with Keep, any action that was to be performed on the package is > cancelled. In addition, the package will not be automatically upgraded > [a] until the hold is removed. You may cancel a hold by issuing the > Install command. >

Re: Comparison of aptitude hold and pinning?

2006-05-28 Thread Marc Wilson
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 09:17:46AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > dpkg stores the 'hold' information, see: > dpkg --get-selections|grep -i PACKAGENAME No. A hold placed with dpkg and one placed with aptitude are not the same thing and are not stored in the same place. Under certain circumstances

Re: Comparison of aptitude hold and pinning?

2006-05-26 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
Adam Funk wrote: I recently used the `aptitude hold` command. It seems to be doing what I expected but I'm curious -- what are the differences between this and pinning a package in /etc/apt/preferences, and where does aptitude hold store the information? (`grep -r PACKAGENAME /etc/apt/`

Re: Comparison of aptitude hold and pinning?

2006-05-26 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 5/25/06, Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I recently used the `aptitude hold` command. It seems to be doing what I expected but I'm curious -- what are the differences between this and pinning a package in /etc/apt/preferences, and where does aptitude hold store the informati

Comparison of aptitude hold and pinning?

2006-05-25 Thread Adam Funk
I recently used the `aptitude hold` command. It seems to be doing what I expected but I'm curious -- what are the differences between this and pinning a package in /etc/apt/preferences, and where does aptitude hold store the information? (`grep -r PACKAGENAME /etc/apt/` turns up no