On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 09:42:58AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 01:49:07PM -0500, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
> > bts tag 233129 d-i
>
> Hm, that's an interesting one. It looks like the apt fetcher claims
> that the update succeeded even when som
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 01:49:07PM -0500, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> bts tag 233129 d-i
Hm, that's an interesting one. It looks like the apt fetcher claims
that the update succeeded even when some sources failed, so I have to
iterate the list of download items after the
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 01:56:53PM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:24:15AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
> >
> >> (Etch) aptitude's error handling [cough] falls short of optimum
> >> behaviour. In particular it returns an exit status of zero in var
bts tag 233129 d-i
thanks
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I'm currently busy working on other parts of the program. If you want
> this in a hurry your best bet is to either send a working patch to a bug
> report or (if such a patch already exists) to harass me via email until
> I apply it. :-) Prefera
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 01:57:55PM +, Nick Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > ... If you want this in a hurry your best bet is to either
> > send a working patch to a bug report or (if such a patch
> > already exists) to harass me via email until I apply i
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:24:15AM +, Nick Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
>
>> Does anyone think another bug report is called for ?
>> It looks as though it's known that the error handling behaviour
>> needs attention but it's not high on anybody's TODO l
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:24:15AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
>
>> (Etch) aptitude's error handling [cough] falls short of optimum
>> behaviour. In particular it returns an exit status of zero in various
>> failure situations
[...]
>> I did a quick test with 'apt-get'
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:24:15AM +, Nick Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Does anyone think another bug report is called for ?
> It looks as though it's known that the error handling behaviour
> needs attention but it's not high on anybody's TODO list.
I'm currently busy work
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:24:15AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
> In the course of scripting some aptitude upgrade activity I've found
> that (Etch) aptitude's error handling [cough] falls short of optimum
> behaviour. In particular it returns an exit status of zero in various
> failure situations, wh
In the course of scripting some aptitude upgrade activity I've found
that (Etch) aptitude's error handling [cough] falls short of optimum
behaviour. In particular it returns an exit status of zero in various
failure situations, which is unhelpful, to say the least.
For example:
Although it helpf
10 matches
Mail list logo