Am Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:24:21 -0700
schrieb Kushal Kumaran :
> I re-read your message and realized I didn't notice that you were
> talking about translated description.
> https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/ddtp would appear to be a
> good starting point for that.
Thanks for your answer.
I c
On Tue, Jul 12 2022 at 09:50:04 AM, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12 2022 at 03:50:25 PM, Marco wrote:
>> Hello,
>> where should I report (or if possible) directly change the translation
>> of the packages description used by apt?
>> Which package is affected?
>
> Package descriptions are p
On Tue, Jul 12 2022 at 03:50:25 PM, Marco wrote:
> Hello,
> where should I report (or if possible) directly change the translation
> of the packages description used by apt?
> Which package is affected?
Package descriptions are part of the package itself. So you'd report it
as a bug on xwit. If
Hello,
where should I report (or if possible) directly change the translation
of the packages description used by apt?
Which package is affected?
--
kind regards
Marco
songbird wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
> ...
> > Many of the language-specific tools have a tendency to
> > automatically acquire the latest version of a library or module
> > every time they are invoked, or to spit errors if they can't
> > pull down the version that they were asked to get. That's ra
Dan Ritter wrote:
...
> There are good reasons for doing this on a local basis.
sure, and nothing prevents that from being accomplished.
it isn't like the tools would go away.
> For example, let's say you have an organization that develops
> a software service and sells access to it. When an e
songbird wrote:
> Keith Christian wrote:
> > Are there any methods to create Debian packages for these (and
> > similar) package tools (and the files they install) so that Debian's
> > native packaging system has "inventory control" everything?
> >
> > I realize that software has been installed ou
Keith Christian wrote:
> Are there any methods to create Debian packages for these (and
> similar) package tools (and the files they install) so that Debian's
> native packaging system has "inventory control" everything?
>
> I realize that software has been installed outside of APT's purview
> sinc
Hi.
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 07:46:27AM -0700, Keith Christian wrote:
> Are there any methods to create Debian packages for these (and
> similar) package tools (and the files they install) so that Debian's
> native packaging system has "inventory control" everything?
dh-make-perl, gem2deb,
Are there any methods to create Debian packages for these (and
similar) package tools (and the files they install) so that Debian's
native packaging system has "inventory control" everything?
I realize that software has been installed outside of APT's purview
since the beginnings of Debian, but I
On 9/7/19 4:20 PM, Amir Emami wrote:
Hi.
i uninstalled python completely and deleted the interpreter files.
my apt tool corrupted.
i installed python again and my apt didnt work yet.
then i used 'apt remove(purge) apt' to remove and install apt again
now when i'm trying to install it via dpkg -i
Hi.
i uninstalled python completely and deleted the interpreter files.
my apt tool corrupted.
i installed python again and my apt didnt work yet.
then i used 'apt remove(purge) apt' to remove and install apt again
now when i'm trying to install it via dpkg -i it shows me an error
so i used --force-
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 01:26:28 Michael Tsang wrote:
> Consider the following:
> Package foo is installed (version 1.0). As it is not in any of the
> repositories, its priority is 100.
> Package foo is available in both repo xyz and pqr. The version in xyz is
> 0.9 and its priority is 990; the ver
On 06/22/2010 01:26 AM, Michael Tsang wrote:
Consider the following:
Package foo is installed (version 1.0). As it is not in any of the
repositories, its priority is 100.
Package foo is available in both repo xyz and pqr. The version in xyz is 0.9
and its priority is 990; the version in pqr is 1.
Consider the following:
Package foo is installed (version 1.0). As it is not in any of the
repositories, its priority is 100.
Package foo is available in both repo xyz and pqr. The version in xyz is 0.9
and its priority is 990; the version in pqr is 1.1 and its priority is 500.
Can foo be upgrad
Ross Boylan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:13:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For about two weeks, I have been getting the following
errors when running 'aptitude update' or 'apt-get update':
[snip]
W: Couldn't stat source package list ftp://ftp.tux.org etch/non-free Packages
(/var/li
On Sunday 12 November 2006 03:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For about two weeks, I have been getting the following
> errors when running 'aptitude update' or 'apt-get update':
>
[snip error messages]
> Is anybody else having problems with ftp.tux.org?
Yes, me too; however now that sun-java-* pack
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:13:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For about two weeks, I have been getting the following
> errors when running 'aptitude update' or 'apt-get update':
>
[snip]
> W: Couldn't stat source package list ftp://ftp.tux.org etch/non-free Packages
> (/var/lib/apt/lists/f
For about two weeks, I have been getting the following
errors when running 'aptitude update' or 'apt-get update':
###
Ign ftp://ftp.tux.org etch Release
Get:9 ftp://ftp.tux.org etch/non-free Packages [1967B]
Ign ftp://ftp.tux.org etch/non-free Packages
Get:10 ftp://
>
> Create a document containing this:
>
> phpinfo();
> ?>
>
yes and to be more precise name it e.g. test.php and call it up like
http://myserver.de/test.php
You'll find the configure variable there, NEVER leave this on a open server
!
Just so that other people know what to do when searchin
Create a document containing this:
Tells just about all there is;)
Josh
on 5/2/04 12:32 PM, Jaldhar H. Vyas at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 1 May 2004, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to find out if the PHP4 (4.3.4) package was built with SSL
>> support? I'm trying to look in
On Sat, 1 May 2004, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> Is there a way to find out if the PHP4 (4.3.4) package was built with SSL
> support? I'm trying to look into using php4-imap with imap-s.
>
PHPs' IMAP module supports imaps.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincell
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 03:18:01PM +0100, willem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I went thru the man pages but couldn't find what i was looking for.
> I run testing and unstable, with testing pinned as prime.
> Now i want to get something from unstable, licq, so checked
> the dependencies and it's quite a list.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 03:18:01PM +0100, willem wrote:
> I went thru the man pages but couldn't find what i was looking for. I
> run testing and unstable, with testing pinned as prime. Now i want to
> get something from unstable, licq, so checked the dependencies and
> it's quite a list. But t
Hi,
I went thru the man pages but couldn't find what i was looking for.
I run testing and unstable, with testing pinned as prime.
Now i want to get something from unstable, licq, so checked
the dependencies and it's quite a list.
But the dependencies do not show to which release they belong...
eit
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:34:44AM +1000, Renai LeMay wrote:
> can someone point me to the source for the apt-get and dpkg family of utils?
>
They are in the "apt" package and "dpkg" package. You can find them -
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
kent
--
From se
can someone point me to the source for the apt-get and dpkg family of utils?
thanks,
Renai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
on Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Marshal Wong wrote:
> I was just using dselect to try to update my potato box, when I got
> this message while doing a "[U]date".
>
> Reading Package Lists... Error!
> E: Malformed Priority line
> E: Error occured while processing aleph-dev (
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 12:08:15AM -0400, Marshal Wong wrote:
> I was just using dselect to try to update my potato box, when I got
> this message while doing a "[U]date".
>
> Reading Package Lists... Error!
> E: Malformed Priority line
> E: Error occured while processing aleph-dev (NewVersion1)
>
I was just using dselect to try to update my potato box, when I got
this message while doing a "[U]date".
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Malformed Priority line
E: Error occured while processing aleph-dev (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/state/apt/lists/http.us.debian.org_debian_d
I'm playing around with APT and am running Slink.
Right now I've got apt set up to grab the non-us, frozen, and unstable
versions. I did this originally thinking that something might change
in hamm that wouldn't be reflected in slink. Seems to work fine,
though of course it adds download time to
31 matches
Mail list logo
