Re: Noninteractive "apt-get upgrade "question.

2004-12-23 Thread Wayne Topa
Sam Watkins([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:26:56AM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > > Sam Watkins([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > I just noticed there are some dpkg options that cause it not to ask > > > these questions. > > > > > > --force

Re: Noninteractive "apt-get upgrade "question.

2004-12-23 Thread Sam Watkins
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:26:56AM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > Sam Watkins([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > I just noticed there are some dpkg options that cause it not to ask > > these questions. > > > > --force-confold and --force-confnew > > > > I wouldn't use --force-confnew,

Re: Noninteractive "apt-get upgrade "question.

2004-12-23 Thread Wayne Topa
Sam Watkins([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 02:57:53AM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote: > > I just noticed there are some dpkg options that cause it not to ask > these questions. > > --force-confold and --force-confnew > > I wouldn't use --force-confnew, but --f

Re: Noninteractive "apt-get upgrade "question.

2004-12-23 Thread Sam Watkins
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 02:57:53AM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 05:31:32PM +1100, Ivan Teliatnikov wrote: > > What is the best way to "apt-get update" a classroom full of debian > > sarge machines. > > > > I tired using > > > > apt-get update > > DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninterac

Re: Noninteractive "apt-get upgrade "question.

2004-12-20 Thread Sam Watkins
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 05:31:32PM +1100, Ivan Teliatnikov wrote: > What is the best way to "apt-get update" a classroom full of debian > sarge machines. > > I tired using > > apt-get update > DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get -uy dist-upgrade > > Nevertheless I was asked some questions as

Re: Noninteractive "apt-get upgrade "question.

2004-12-20 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Alexander Schmehl wrote: * Ivan Teliatnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041220 07:31]: What is the best way to "apt-get update" a classroom full of debian sarge machines. Assuming you test it on one machine first, ... DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get -uy dist-upgrade Nevertheless I was asked som

Re: Noninteractive "apt-get upgrade "question.

2004-12-20 Thread Juha Siltala
On 2004-12-20, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could run it with=20 > yes | DEBIAN_FRONTEND=3Dnoninteractive apt-get -uy dist-upgrade Actually it depends on the answer you want to give to this question (you might want to use yes to flood the "no" string). Using yes is not an

Re: Noninteractive "apt-get upgrade "question.

2004-12-19 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Ivan Teliatnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041220 07:31]: > What is the best way to "apt-get update" a classroom full of debian > sarge machines. Assuming you test it on one machine first, ... > DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get -uy dist-upgrade > > Nevertheless I was asked some questions as

Noninteractive "apt-get upgrade "question.

2004-12-19 Thread Ivan Teliatnikov
What is the best way to "apt-get update" a classroom full of debian sarge machines. I tired using apt-get update DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get -uy dist-upgrade Nevertheless I was asked some questions as follows: Configuration file `/etc/profile' ==> Modified (by you or by a script)

Re: apt-get upgrade question

2004-03-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:51:43PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > Frédéric Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been > > patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other > > dependant programs (apache-ssl, exim-tsl, ...)

Re: apt-get upgrade question

2004-03-19 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frédéric Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been > patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other > dependant programs (apache-ssl, exim-tsl, ...) in order to make the

Re: apt-get upgrade question

2004-03-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:15:49PM +0100, Asbjørn Sæbø wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:54:18PM +0100, Frédéric Dreier wrote: > > I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been > > patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other > > dependant programs (apa

Re: apt-get upgrade question

2004-03-19 Thread Asbjørn Sæbø
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:54:18PM +0100, Frédéric Dreier wrote: > I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been > patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other > dependant programs (apache-ssl, exim-tsl, ...) in order to make the > update effective? Is

Re: apt-get upgrade question

2004-03-19 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello Frédéric! On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:54:18PM +0100, Frédéric Dreier wrote: > I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been > patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other > dependant programs (apache-ssl, exim-tsl, ...) in order to make the > updat

apt-get upgrade question

2004-03-19 Thread Frédéric Dreier
Hi, I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other dependant programs (apache-ssl, exim-tsl, ...) in order to make the update effective? Thanks for your responses, Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Re: apt-get upgrade question

2002-10-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:10:56PM +, Richard Kimber wrote: > In the course of a recent Debian testing apt-get upgrade, without using > the -u option, a number of packages were upgraded. I discovered that one > of these turned out to be kernel-source-2.4.19. Since I only have one > kernel-sour

apt-get upgrade question

2002-10-31 Thread Richard Kimber
In the course of a recent Debian testing apt-get upgrade, without using the -u option, a number of packages were upgraded. I discovered that one of these turned out to be kernel-source-2.4.19. Since I only have one kernel-source-2.4.19 directory on my machine, I assume that it just overwrote what