Re: apt-get upgrade (stable to testing) 151 packages held back

* J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040224 12:57]: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:44:57 -0800, Roger Chrisman wrote: > > rhc:/etc/apt# apt-get update > > "apt-get dist-upgrade" supposedly makes more sense when upgrading between > releases. I'd --dry-run it first though. For clarity, that

Re: apt-get upgrade (stable to testing) 151 packages held back

Jim wrote: > Hi! I just did an upgrade last week. After you change your > sources.list do apt-get update to update the package > listing. then do  apt-get dist-upgrade to upgrade the entire > system. Aha, 'apt-get dist-upgrade' is what I needed, not 'apt-get upgrade', and this time the 151 packag

Re: apt-get upgrade (stable to testing) 151 packages held back

On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:44:57 -0800, Roger Chrisman wrote: > rhc:/etc/apt# apt-get update "apt-get dist-upgrade" supposedly makes more sense when upgrading between releases. I'd --dry-run it first though. HTH, Ray -- Would you rather be root or reboot? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Re: apt-get upgrade (stable to testing) 151 packages held back

Hi! I just did an upgrade last week. After you change your sources.list do apt-get update to update the package listing. then do apt-get dist-upgrade to upgrade the entire system. Jim - Original Message Follows - > Hi guys, > > Is it *normal* for 151 packages to be held back > and only

apt-get upgrade (stable to testing) 151 packages held back

Hi guys, Is it *normal* for 151 packages to be held back and only 28 upgraded when upgrading Woody[1] to Sarge? I did[2], rhc:/etc/apt# vi sources.list rhc:/etc/apt# apt-get upgrade rhc:/etc/apt# apt-get update Did I do the upgrade incorrectly? Thanks, Roger TEFLChina.