On 07/10/2012 06:46 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
So the problem is apparently in the building of the initrd and its
detection of ‘necessary’ modules
That sounds plausible. Unfortunately, I don't have knowledge of of
initramfs system. Looking at it's /etc tree and a few man pages, I
might be ab
Hello David,
David Christensen wrote:
> The warning "target sda2_crypt uses a key file, skipped" doesn't make
> sense -- /dev/sda2 does not use a key file:
>
> 2012-07-10 17:18:38 root@i72600s ~
> # cat /etc/crypttab
> sda2_crypt UUID=c020df80-6439-4e9e-a70e-0ff303d61180 none,discard luks
> s1f
On 07/09/2012 08:40 AM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Thanks for the reply. :-)
David Christensen wrote:
Loading Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 ...
Loading initial ramdisk ...
Loading, please wait...
Gave up waiting for root device. Common problems:
- Boot args (cat /proc/
Hello David,
David Christensen wrote:
> Loading Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 ...
> Loading initial ramdisk ...
> Loading, please wait...
> Gave up waiting for root device. Common problems:
> - Boot args (cat /proc/cmdline)
> - Check rootdelay= (did the system wait
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 07:30:42 -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> I have an Intel DQ67SW motherboard with Intel i7-2600S processor and
> have installed debian-6.0.5-amd64 and the 3.2 kernel from backports.
>
>
> I ran "apt-get update" and "apt-get upgrade" yesterday. Since then, the
> system fails
debian-user:
I have an Intel DQ67SW motherboard with Intel i7-2600S processor and
have installed debian-6.0.5-amd64 and the 3.2 kernel from backports.
I ran "apt-get update" and "apt-get upgrade" yesterday. Since then, the
system fails to boot:
Loading Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 ...
Wouldn't it make sense to change the installation process to use woody
instead of testing ?
The last installation CDs I tested selected apt servers with testing and
not woody as distribution.
Regards
Jens
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 14:43, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Shawn Lamson wrote:
> > deb http://ht
Shawn Lamson wrote:
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian woody main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian woody main contrib non-free
> deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib non-free
>
> I havent seen any updates for weeks - is this a sign of woody goi
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian woody main contrib non-free
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian woody main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib non-free
I havent seen any updates for weeks - is this a sign of woody going
stable and not getting upda
I'm trying to do a upgrade to unstable from stable progeny and I
did the ususal:
apt-get update ..then
apt-get dist-upgrade
something went wrong during i think computer froze and I wasn't able
to respond to prompts given..what did
happen though is now netscape seems symlinked to that
Am 19. Jun, 2001 schwäzte thomas so:
> hi,
>
> i want to run the above as a cron job (like many do i guess). but
> sometimes apt-get asks me if i want to replace the configuration files,
> and i always answer N. but the only option with apt-get is -y, which will
> probably (i havent tried it out
thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i want to run the above as a cron job (like many do i guess). but
>sometimes apt-get asks me if i want to replace the configuration files,
>and i always answer N. but the only option with apt-get is -y, which
>will probably (i havent tried it out) replace the my c
hi,
i want to run the above as a cron job (like many do i guess). but
sometimes apt-get asks me if i want to replace the configuration files,
and i always answer N. but the only option with apt-get is -y, which
will probably (i havent tried it out) replace the my config files with
the default ones
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> You may want to investigate 'capt', which replaces dselect.
I will do that. But there seem to be a lot of "dselect replacements" lately...
is capt the
"official" replacement?
> > Can this be achieved somehow, so I can keep track of "new" packages
> > better?
> Re-
on Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 10:09:22AM +, Ekkehard Kraemer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > apt-get update && apt-get upgrade --download-only
>
> If I run apt-get from inside dselect (with "U" in the main menu), then
>
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> apt-get update && apt-get upgrade --download-only
If I run apt-get from inside dselect (with "U" in the main menu), then
when I "S"elect packages the first time, all packages that are new will
be displayed at the top of all pac
On Nov 12 2000, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> 1) Use "apt-get -d upgrade", so the files will be downloaded but not
>installed. So you can run an apt-get upgrade in the morning while
>disconnected, since all files were fetched, and then you'll bne
>able to interact with dpkg.
Tha
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 06:37:10PM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> :: Walter Tautz writes:
>
> > Just wondering if this is possible in view of the fact that
> > configuration is sometime done and so requires interaction.
>
> > Is the -q option appropriate? .any advice?
>
> > -walter
>
>
rade as a matter of course. Particularly if
> you're tracking unstable.
> My preference:
> apt-get update && apt-get upgrade --download-only
Maybe do an apt-get update first, then choose the wanted packages, and
put only an apt-get -y upgrade in the crontab? That way he'd have
#x27;re tracking unstable.
My preference:
apt-get update && apt-get upgrade --download-only
...which will archive updated .debs, but not install them. I manually
run an 'upgrade' once or twice a week.
--
Karsten M. Self http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
Evangelist, Zelera
:: Walter Tautz writes:
> Just wondering if this is possible in view of the fact that
> configuration is sometime done and so requires interaction.
> Is the -q option appropriate? .any advice?
> -walter
Assuming you want to download the files at night, for example. I
believe you can either:
Just wondering if this is possible in view of the fact that
configuration is sometime done and so requires interaction.
Is the -q option appropriate? .any advice?
-walter
22 matches
Mail list logo
