-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 10:50:47AM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hi Tomás,
>
> many thanks for your response :-)
[...]
> retry temporary address regeneration
> Apr 21 10:36:01 master kernel: [3019221.240105] IPv6: ipv6_create_tempaddr:
[...]
> Al
Hi Tomás,
many thanks for your response :-)
Am Samstag, 21. April 2018, 08:43:20 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018, 22:13:11 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> > > curl -I http://security.debian.org/debian-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Am Freitag, 20. April 2018, 22:13:11 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> > curl -I http://security.debian.org/debian-security/
>
> root@master:~/tmp# curl -I http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian
Hi,
I just realized sometimes it also shows in apt-get upgrade:
[...]
Setting up libreoffice-writer (1:5.2.7-1+deb9u4) ...
Setting up libreoffice-base (1:5.2.7-1+deb9u4) ...
Setting up libreoffice-report-builder-bin (1:5.2.7-1+deb9u4) ...
Setting up libreoffice-report-builder (1:5.2.7-1+deb9u4) .
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 22:20:12 +0200
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> root@master:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
(...)
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates main
> contrib non-free
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates main
> contrib non-free
her
Am Freitag, 20. April 2018, 22:13:11 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> curl -I http://security.debian.org/debian-security/
root@master:~/tmp# curl -I http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:19:14 GMT
Server: Apache/2.4.10 (Debian)
Content-Type: text/html;charset=U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:02:40PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see often the error:
> Error: Timeout was reached
> during an apt-get update.
[...]
> Hit:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stretch Release
>
Hi,
I see often the error:
Error: Timeout was reached
during an apt-get update.
Any idea what could cause this and how to debug it?
The entire configuration is shown below.
root@master:~# apt-get -v
apt 1.4.8 (amd64)
Supported modules:
*Ver: Standard .deb
*Pkg: Debian dpkg interface
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:27:15AM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> > On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >
> >> *groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
> >> --print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architec
At face value I'd assumed Tony was reflecting on the freedom a user has to
make something work how they want.
I didn't consider it as demanding, because unless he had offered to create
the features or rally the developers himself or point the OP to another
list, and assuming Tony wasn't overwhelme
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
>> *groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
>> --print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
>> about.
>>
> Because you haven't written it yet?
>
IMHO this
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 01:47:19PM +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> >*groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
> >--print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
> >about.
> >
> Because you haven't written it yet?
N
On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
*groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
--print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
about.
Because you haven't written it yet?
--
Tony van der Hoff| mailto:t...@vanderhoff.org
Buckinghamshire, England |
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:48:45AM +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Am 06.12.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Klaus Jantzen:
> > dpkg --remove-architecture i368
> > apt-get update
> >
> > But I cannot add the correct architecture:
> >
> > dpkg --add-architecture i386
> > apt-get update
> > dpkg --print-
Am 06.12.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Klaus Jantzen:
> On 12/05/2015 08:56 PM, Myscelus wrote:
>> On 12/05/2015 08:55 PM, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
>>> but wrote 'i368' -
>>> I get the following error messages when running a
On 12/05/2015 08:56 PM, Myscelus wrote:
> On 12/05/2015 08:55 PM, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
>> but wrote 'i368' -
>> I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> W: Failed to fetch
> Hi,
>
> due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
> but wrote 'i368' -
> I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:
>
>
> ...
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/dists/vivid/Release
> Unable to find expected
On 12/05/2015 08:55 PM, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
Hi,
due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
but wrote 'i368' -
I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:
...
W: Failed to fetch
http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/dists/vivid/Releas
Hi,
due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
but wrote 'i368' -
I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:
...
W: Failed to fetch
http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/dists/vivid/Release
Unable to find expected entry 'contrib/binar
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 07:54:18PM +0800, Gero Putzar
was heard to say:
> So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
> installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
> for the following dependency".
That message just lists the depend
On Sat,05.Sep.09, 19:54:18, Gero Putzar wrote:
>
> I tried to install the package "shutter" from testing on my stable distro. I
> included the testing repositories in the apt-sources list and set
> APT::Default-Release "lenny";
Be careful with that, due to a long-standing bug in apt codenames are
On 2009-09-05 06:54, Gero Putzar wrote:
Thank you very much for your help!
@ Brian:
So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
for the following dependency".
Well, I'm not a native spea
Thank you very much for your help!
@ Brian:
So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
for the following dependency".
Well, I'm not a native speaker. So maybe I should not complain about
On 2009-09-04 23:03, Gero Putzar wrote:
Hi,
I get the following error message from apt-get:
---snip---
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-i386: Breaks: lib32asound2 (<= 1.0.20-2) but 1.0.16-2 is to be
installed
Breaks: lib32gcc1 (<= 1:4.4.0-6) but 1:4.3.2-1.1
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:03:37PM +0800, Gero Putzar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get the following error message from apt-get:
>
> ---snip---
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libc6-i386: Breaks: lib32asound2 (<= 1.0.20-2) but 1.0.16-2 is to be
> installed
> Breaks: lib3
Hi,
I get the following error message from apt-get:
---snip---
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-i386: Breaks: lib32asound2 (<= 1.0.20-2) but 1.0.16-2 is to be
installed
Breaks: lib32gcc1 (<= 1:4.4.0-6) but 1:4.3.2-1.1 is to be
installed
---snap---
I don't und
Jonathan Kaye wrote:
> Hi all,
> Suddenly when upgrading my system whether using apt-get, aptitude or wajig
> I get the following error message:
> -
> (Reading database ... dpkg: error
> processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmjpegtools0_1%3a1.8.0-0.5_i386.deb
>
Hi all,
Suddenly when upgrading my system whether using apt-get, aptitude or wajig I
get the following error message:
-
(Reading database ... dpkg: error
processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmjpegtools0_1%3a1.8.0-0.5_i386.deb
(--unpack):
short read in buffer_co
Sorry, but I haven´t read the problem. What did happend?
Kind regards.
2007/5/30, disguise_account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
i am stuck with the same problem ... please tell me how did u solved it
.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
i am stuck with the same problem ... please tell me how did u solved it .
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 18:38, Nikhil Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm getting following errors after "apt-get upgrade".I'm using Sarge
> 3.1 and tried to upgrade after adding testing & unstable repositories
> to my source.lst file.All packages were successfully downloaded.
>
Hi,
I'm getting following errors after "apt-get upgrade".I'm using Sarge
3.1 and tried to upgrade after adding testing & unstable repositories
to my source.lst file.All packages were successfully downloaded.
--
I encountered this problem yesterday while trying to run "apt-get
upgrade" on my
i386 based system running "unstable". I update frequently, and have not
had this
error before. I've attached a script which shows my sources and the
error messages.
Can anyone shed some light on this for me? Has an
Im getting this error when apt-getting the
kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp package... anyone know what i should
do next? Thanks...
Setting up kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp (2.6.8-8) ...
cpio: (0x): No such file or directory
cp: cannot stat `(0x)': No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why
Well, maybe you could copy the error in your email? Provide information
about your system (is it woody/stable sarge/nearly-stable ??) and such ?
Joris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why
I did have the experimental version installed. I was using the
experimental feed to run Gnome 2.6 before it reached unstable, and had
accidentally updated apt to experimental as well.
I finally ended up just downloading the apt package from my unstable
source, forcibly removing the 0.6.25 and then
John Summerfield wrote:
I would guess that the packages are unsigned (??) or failed their md5sum
check.
Or rather the Release file is unsigned.
I would do one of two things:
a. File a bug report on it. This is an excellent way of ensuring the
maintainer(s) know about it and is in line with Debia
I've been getting the strangest error from apt-get lately:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/krezel# apt-get install ntop
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libgdome2-0
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libg
I would guess that the packages are unsigned (??) or failed their md5sum
check.
I would do one of two things:
a. File a bug report on it. This is an excellent way of ensuring the
maintainer(s) know about it and is in line with Debian's policy of no
secrets
b. Ask the maintainer what's going on
Nick Smith said:
> can someone tell me what to do to get rid of this error message:
>
> dpkg: error processing sslwrap (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> sslwrap
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an
can someone tell me what to do to get rid of this error message:
dpkg: error processing sslwrap (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
sslwrap
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
i tried apt-g
CW Harris declaimed:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:15:11AM -0800, Paul Mackinney wrote:
>> For some time I get the following error in apt-get on a Testing system:
>>
>> apt-extracttemplates: error while loading shared libraries: \
>> libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2.so.3.2: cannot open shared object file
PLS UNSUBSCRIBE ME
- Original Message -
From: "CW Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: persistant apt-get error
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:15:11AM -0800, Paul Mackinney
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:15:11AM -0800, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> For some time I get the following error in apt-get on a Testing system:
>
> apt-extracttemplates: error while loading shared libraries: \
> libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2.so.3.2: cannot open shared object file: \
> No such file or dir
For some time I get the following error in apt-get on a Testing system:
apt-extracttemplates: error while loading shared libraries: \
libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2.so.3.2: cannot open shared object file: \
No such file or directory
I haven't found anything in the bug database. Anyone have a soluti
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:51:44AM -0500, Jeff Self said
> I tried building a kernel 2.6.0 last week using make-kpkg. When I run
> dpkg -i kernel-image-2.6.0_10.00.Custom_i386.deb I get the following
> message:
> dpkg: serious warning: files list file for package `kernel-image-2.6.0'
> missing, ass
I tried building a kernel 2.6.0 last week using make-kpkg. When I run
dpkg -i kernel-image-2.6.0_10.00.Custom_i386.deb I get the following
message:
dpkg: serious warning: files list file for package `kernel-image-2.6.0'
missing, assuming package has no files currently installed.
121265 files and di
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 05:26:38PM -0500, Lou Losee said
> * Toshiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-20 16:26]:
> > > > > >I'm running sid, I'm having a problem with the upgrade of kdm, the
> > > > > > error just says that the postinstallation script return an error
> > > > > > (30). This message is v
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 02:45:04PM -0300, Toshiro wrote:
> I'm running sid, I'm having a problem with the upgrade of kdm, the error just
> says that the postinstallation script return an error (30). This message is
> very cryptic and it's pretty much useless.
That error is from debconf. Run with
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 02:45:04PM -0300, Toshiro wrote:
> I'm running sid, I'm having a problem with the upgrade of kdm, the error just
> says that the postinstallation script return an error (30). This message is
> very cryptic and it's pretty much useless.
>
> Anybody know if there is a proc
* Toshiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-20 16:26]:
> > > > >I'm running sid, I'm having a problem with the upgrade of kdm, the
> > > > > error just says that the postinstallation script return an error
> > > > > (30). This message is very cryptic and it's pretty much useless.
> >
> > Have you tried
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 04:48:53PM -0300, Toshiro wrote:
> On Saturday 20 December 2003 16:38, Kent West wrote:
> > Toshiro wrote:
> > >I'm running sid, I'm having a problem with the upgrade of kdm, the error
> > > just says that the postinstallation script return an error (30). This
> > > message
> > > >I'm running sid, I'm having a problem with the upgrade of kdm, the
> > > > error just says that the postinstallation script return an error
> > > > (30). This message is very cryptic and it's pretty much useless.
>
> Have you tried "script"?
I think 'script' is used to capture screen output
Incoming from Toshiro:
> On Saturday 20 December 2003 16:38, Kent West wrote:
> > Toshiro wrote:
> > >I'm running sid, I'm having a problem with the upgrade of kdm, the error
> > > just says that the postinstallation script return an error (30). This
> > > message is very cryptic and it's pretty mu
On Saturday 20 December 2003 16:38, Kent West wrote:
> Toshiro wrote:
> >I'm running sid, I'm having a problem with the upgrade of kdm, the error
> > just says that the postinstallation script return an error (30). This
> > message is very cryptic and it's pretty much useless.
>
> What tool are you
Toshiro wrote:
I'm running sid, I'm having a problem with the upgrade of kdm, the error just
says that the postinstallation script return an error (30). This message is
very cryptic and it's pretty much useless.
What tool are you using to do the upgrade? apt-get upgrade?
dist-upgrade? aptit
I'm running sid, I'm having a problem with the upgrade of kdm, the error just
says that the postinstallation script return an error (30). This message is
very cryptic and it's pretty much useless.
Anybody know if there is a procedure to see what is going on really? I mean,
I'd like to watch th
Try
apt-get -f install
and see if it fixes the problem.
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten M. Self [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 November 2003 12:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Apt-get error with package diff
>
>
> on Mon, Oct 27,
on Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:01:05PM +0100, Juan Pablo Valenzuela ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hello:
> my pc frezze in a middle of a dist-upgrade so i must to restart. Now the
> apt-get doesn't work anymore... this is the message:
>
> # apt-get install diff
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Buildi
Hello:
my pc frezze in a middle of a dist-upgrade so i must to restart. Now the
apt-get doesn't work anymore... this is the message:
# apt-get install diff
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be upgraded
diff
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, j2 wrote:
> > get more RAM
>
> 2GB is enough for most people.
>
> > create another swap partition
>
> 1GB should suffice.. Especially since i am only using about 600MB of RAM.
>
> >
> > create a swap file
> >
>
> See above.
Ya, I didn't know about the apt config thing...
stil
> get more RAM
2GB is enough for most people.
> create another swap partition
1GB should suffice.. Especially since i am only using about 600MB of RAM.
>
> create a swap file
>
See above.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 10:08:39PM +0200, j2 wrote:
| Running a unstable/stable system and i got the below and would
| apreciate any hints?
|
| cookiemonster:~# apt-get update
| Reading Package Lists... Error!
| E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
| E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
Old problem.
remove the "stable" entries from your sources.list... it is very
unlikely you have any stable packages installed because unstable
contains newer versions
get more RAM
create another swap partition
create a swap file
don't post HTML... nothing to do with the update problem, but making
us downlo
>Ol problem.
>
># echo 'APT::Cache-Limit 14194304;' >> /etc/apt/apt.conf
Worked perfectly, thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In general, when you've got a question, it's a good idea to try doing
>a simple web search, or search of this mailing list's archives.
Well, i did. But i do admit to making a typo. Sorry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:23:33 -0600 (MDT)
Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> remove the "stable" entries from your sources.list... it is very
> unlikely you have any stable packages installed because unstable
> contains newer versions
Quite untrue and very bad advice. If one is riding tes
--- Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:08:39 +0200
> j2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Reading Package Lists... Error!
> > E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
> > E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
> > E: Error occured while processing x3270 (NewVersion1)
> > E: Prob
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:08:39 +0200
j2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading Package Lists... Error!
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
> E: Error occured while processing x3270 (NewVersion1)
> E: Problem with MergeList
> /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.du.se_debian_dists_uns
Running a unstable/stable system and i got the
below and would apreciate any hints?
cookiemonster:~# apt-get updateHit http://ftp.du.se unstable/main PackagesHit http://ftp.du.se unstable/main
Release
Hit http://ftp.du.se unstable/non-free
Packages
Hit http://ft
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:08:39 +0200
"j2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running a unstable/stable system and i got the below and would apreciate any
> hints?
Did you C&P the entire error string into Google before posting here? :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your sh
parsed or
> opened.
In general, when you've got a question, it's a good idea to try doing
a simple web search, or search of this mailing list's archives. In
particular, your question gets asked pretty frequently (it's not really
that weird an apt-get error).
See http://www.debi
Hi. A couple of comments.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:59:46 -0700
Wm.G.McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In
> order to conduct a useful search you have to understand and define
> the problem correctly.
Actually, not necessarily. When it comes to computer error messages,
I've successfully dealt
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:29:56 -0400
Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:In general, when you've got a question, it's a good idea to try
::doing a simple web search, or search of this mailing list's
::archives. In particular, your question gets asked pretty
::frequently.
::See http://www.debia
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 01:43:02 -0700
Wm.G.McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> What's the problem here?
In general, when you've got a question, it's a good idea to try doing
a simple web search, or search of this mailing list's archives. In
particular, your question gets asked pretty frequent
Hi there!
Wm.G.McGrath wrote:
> [...]
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
> E: Error occured while processing pentium-builder (NewVersion1)
> E: Problem with MergeList
> /var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_testing_main_binary
> -i386_Packages
>
> E: The package lists or status file coul
Hello
Wm.G.McGrath wrote:
> What's the problem here?
> Failed to fetch cdrom:['Libranet GNU/Linux 1.9
> CD1']/archive/Packages Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD
> recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CDs
> Reading Package Lists...
>
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
>
Hi,
I'm fine tuning my sources.list file and get the following error
message.
The presence of CDs in the file seems to create a problem for
apt-get update. The CDs were added with apt-cdrom, and are present
in both the sources.list and /var/lib/apt/cdroms.list files.
But the second problem is
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:31:15AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> Today I noticed a starnge (to me) behaviour of apt-get. I am running a
> predominantly sarge system with the latest xpdf installed. For some
> reason I downloaded the deb sources of the same and installed it.
>
> But, when I do an ap
Today I noticed a starnge (to me) behaviour of apt-get. I am running a
predominantly sarge system with the latest xpdf installed. For some
reason I downloaded the deb sources of the same and installed it.
But, when I do an apt-get upgrade, it is downloading the version from
testing and installing
On 6 Jun 2003 Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 13:05, Ben Kal wrote:
>> On 4 Jun 2003 Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > When I 'apt-get install' a package I have been getting the following error
>> > message:
>> >
>> > Retrieving bug reports... Done
>> >
On 4 Jun 2003 Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I 'apt-get install' a package I have been getting the following error
> message:
>
> Retrieving bug reports... Done
> dpkg-deb: wait for tar failed: No child processes Traceback (most recent
> call last):
> File "/usr/bin/apt-listchang
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 13:05, Ben Kal wrote:
> On 4 Jun 2003 Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > When I 'apt-get install' a package I have been getting the following error
> > message:
> >
> > Retrieving bug reports... Done
> > dpkg-deb: wait for tar failed: No child processes Traceback (
When I 'apt-get install' a package I have been getting the following
error message:
Retrieving bug reports... Done
dpkg-deb: wait for tar failed: No child processes
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", line 125, in ?
(changes, urgency) = apt_listchanges.ex
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 01:32:31AM -0700, Sean C. Burbidge wrote:
> Just today I started getting the following errors when trying to install
> packages using apt-get or dpkg:
>
> # apt-get install mcrypt
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Depende
Just today I started getting the following errors when trying to install
packages using apt-get or dpkg:
# apt-get install mcrypt
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libmcrypt4
I'm not really sure, but I suppose that the default cache size used by
apt became small for the amount of packages got by apt-get update. So
the line below increased the cache size and allowed apt to work
correctly again, for the cache available space now is enough. Some on
the list could confirm i
thank you!!! that did it. so what exactly was the problem?
why/where/how did apt run out of room??
saved my butt, I really appreciate it!
m
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 03:17:35PM -0500, Bruno Diniz de Paula wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> try adding 'APT::Cache-Limit 25165824;' to your /etc/apt/apt.conf fil
Hi Matt,
try adding 'APT::Cache-Limit 25165824;' to your /etc/apt/apt.conf file.
Cheers,
Bruno.
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 15:13, Matt Price wrote:
> hi,
>
> can someone parse this error for me? Got it while trying apt-get update:
>
>
> Reading Package Lists... Error!
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of
... and now I get a "segmentation fault" every time I try using
apt-get or apt-cache.
help much appreciated as always!!!
matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
can someone parse this error for me? Got it while trying apt-get update:
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing kernel-image-2.4.18-hotplugforalsa
(NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/dpkg/status
E: The package lists or
On Friday 20 December 2002 03:25, Russ Cook wrote:
> I saw a similar message topic back in October, with no solution posted.
> I now have two computers exhibiting this problem when using apt-get.
> Does anyone know a solution?
>
> Thanks,
> Russ
Googling would've given you the answer. Try s
I saw a similar message topic back in October, with no solution posted.
I now have two computers exhibiting this problem when using apt-get.
Does anyone know a solution?
Thanks,
Russ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Extracted from: http://katspace.net/computers/linux_tips.txt
"This happened because Debian is so big now, that once I started listing
multiple sources, it couldn't cope with them all with its default
settings for its Dynamic MMap (which stands for Dynamic Memory Map I
think). The way this gets fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I have the following problem:
when updating the package database (apt-get update) I get the following
error message:
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing libqt3-mt-odbc (NewVersi
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 01:56:24PM +0100, Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:25:31PM +0100, Simon Pepping wrote:
> > I am trying to upgrade from potato to woody. I get the following error
> > messages:
> >
> > - When I use dselect: Couldn't perform immediate configuration
> > - When
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:25:31PM +0100, Simon Pepping wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to upgrade from potato to woody. I get the following error
> messages:
>
> - When I use dselect: Couldn't perform immediate configuration
> - When I use apt-get install dpkg apt debconf: Couldn't configure a
>
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade from potato to woody. I get the following error
messages:
- When I use dselect: Couldn't perform immediate configuration
- When I use apt-get install dpkg apt debconf: Couldn't configure a
pre-depend
I am running woody, with these versions:
ii apt0.3.19
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 10:53:45PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I dont think im using woody... im using potato...
I see. It worked back in r3 days for me. But potato was just upgrades
to r5. That may be the reason. XIMIN tends to cause dependancy problem
with security update etc even on p
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
