On Vi, 16 iul 10, 14:53:08, Martin Kraus wrote:
> Hi.
> Is there a way to find circular dependencies in apt? Meaning groups of
> packages that aren't used by any programs and are installed only because a
> depends on b, b on c, c on d and d on a?
There was recently a thread on debian-devel abou
On Vi, 16 iul 10, 19:35:13, Tom Furie wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:53:08PM +0200, Martin Kraus wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to find circular dependencies in apt? Meaning groups of
> > packages that aren't used by any programs and are installed only because a
> > depends on
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:53:08PM +0200, Martin Kraus wrote:
> Is there a way to find circular dependencies in apt? Meaning groups of
> packages that aren't used by any programs and are installed only because a
> depends on b, b on c, c on d and d on a?
I don't know about other ap
Hi.
Is there a way to find circular dependencies in apt? Meaning groups of
packages that aren't used by any programs and are installed only because a
depends on b, b on c, c on d and d on a?
thank you for help
mk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On Saturday 31 July 2004 10:25, Brian Astill wrote:
> Basicaly the question is in the subject line :-)
>
> I recently re-installed, saving my original home files and so on,
> including the .deb files from /var/cache. I have put those files back
> into /var/cache.
>
> Will apt or aptitude find thos
Hi Brian Astill, *,
Brian Astill wrote on Sat Jul 31, 2004 at 12:25:30PM -0400:
> Will apt or aptitude find those files, or will they want to download
> them again?
It should find them... that's where the cache is for
--
so long,
Rainer Bendig aka mindz PGP/GPG key (ID: 0xCC7E
Basicaly the question is in the subject line :-)
I recently re-installed, saving my original home files and so on,
including the .deb files from /var/cache. I have put those files back
into /var/cache.
Will apt or aptitude find those files, or will they want to download
them again?
--
Regar
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 12:07:08PM -0700, Mr.Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Marco Giardini wrote:
>
> > After having upgraded (using apt-get) my slink distribution (intel i386)
> > the usefull apt-find doesn't work any more.
>
> Use cons
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Marco Giardini wrote:
> After having upgraded (using apt-get) my slink distribution (intel i386)
> the usefull apt-find doesn't work any more.
Use console-apt, which is the what apt-find was renamed too
Jason
After having upgraded (using apt-get) my slink distribution (intel i386)
the usefull apt-find doesn't work any more.
It exits with a :
Parsing apt sources list...
It is an absolute dist thingy...
Boy they suck major ass.
It is an absolute dist thingy...
Boy they suck major ass.
Segmentation
I tried to get apt-find but it tells me that I need libapt2.5. I can seem to
find it anywhere although I have found libapt.0.3-dev. Does anyone know
where libapt2.5 is.
Roderick P. Person
Programmer I
CCBH (412)454-2616
"We're not that good. Everyone else just sucks!"
- anon. Navy Seal
Hello!
I'v install new apt-find (0.6.0p1-1) on my slink box. But it does not work.
The transcript is:
galileo# apt-find
Parsing apt sources list...
It is an absolute dist thingy...
Boy they suck major ass.
It is an absolute dist thingy...
Boy they suck major ass.
Segmentation fault
12 matches
Mail list logo
