Am 16.09.2010 15:28, schrieb Sven Joachim:
>
> Indeed you can't, you would have to write the code to insert the
> Content-* headers in the first place. Look at the launch_job function
> in runjob.c in the anacron source.
>
That looks just like the right spot. Thanks, Sven!
I wrote to anacron's
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:11:51 +0200, Malte Forkel wrote:
> Am 16.09.2010 13:00, schrieb Camaleón:
>
>> As per "man 5 crontab":
(...)
>> Which does not comply with your e-mail (provided that there is no
>> "Content-Type:"). So if "anacron" is using the same routine to send e-
>> mails than "cron"
On 2010-09-16 15:11 +0200, Malte Forkel wrote:
> I think I have to convince anacron to use Content-* headers. But I'm not
> sure I can do that with the environment variables that cron uses.
Indeed you can't, you would have to write the code to insert the
Content-* headers in the first place. Loo
Am 16.09.2010 13:00, schrieb Camaleón:
> As per "man 5 crontab":
>
> ***
> (...)
>
> By default, cron will send mail using the mail "Content-Type:" header
> of"text/plain" with the "charset=" parameter set to the charmap /
> codeset ofthe locale in which crond(8) is started up - ie. eith
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:12:33 +0200, Malte Forkel wrote:
> Am 16.09.2010 10:54, schrieb Camaleón:
>>
>> But the interesting part should be in the e-mail "header" not the
>> "body" of the message (I would like to see "Content-Type:" and
>> "Content-Transfer- Encoding:" part). Better if you send (or
Am 16.09.2010 10:54, schrieb Camaleón:
>
> But the interesting part should be in the e-mail "header" not the "body"
> of the message (I would like to see "Content-Type:" and "Content-Transfer-
> Encoding:" part). Better if you send (or upload to pastebin¹) the whole
> message intact, just delete
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:02:14 +0200, Malte Forkel wrote:
> Am 15.09.2010 10:51, schrieb Camaleón:
>>
>> Mmm, can you upload a sample of the e-mail you are getting so we can
>> take a look into the header? Of course, the e-mail sample should not
>> contain private data :-)
>>
> Sure. Here are the
Am 15.09.2010 10:51, schrieb Camaleón:
>
> "Anacron" or "cron"? It seems they are two different packages :-?
>
Yes, they are. As far as I understand it, anacron makes sure that cron
jobs are run even if the machine is not up 24/7.
>
> Those bug reports are for "cron" and should be already fixe
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:51:01 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
> "Anacron" or "cron"? It seems they are two different packages :-?
They are; Anacron is recommended for machines that aren't up 24/7 so
missed cron jobs (many are run overnight by default) get run as soon a
is convenient
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:54:17 +0200, Malte Forkel wrote:
> I'm using anacron for some tasks on a machine running Lenny. Error
> output from those jobs send by email looks strange in Thunderbird.
"Anacron" or "cron"? It seems they are two different packages :-?
> Mails send by cron supposedly res
Hi,
I'm using anacron for some tasks on a machine running Lenny. Error
output from those jobs send by email looks strange in Thunderbird.
Mails send by cron supposedly respect the locale and include a content
type header, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405335
(cron does not
11 matches
Mail list logo
