Re: alternative for rdiff-backup

2006-09-15 Thread Michael Ott
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:05:00PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 05:49:57PM +0100, Michael Ott wrote: > > Hello! > > > > rdiff-backup crashed every second use. > Hi Michael, > it seems a wiser thing to do to try to help the maintainer of > rdiff-backup as both of you have an i

Re: alternative for rdiff-backup

2006-09-14 Thread Steve Lamb
Michael Ott wrote: > And now I want a new backup system which work nearly like rdiff-backup: > Copy only last changed data to another box. But no problems when the > boxes lost the connection or something like that Personally I use dirvish. It only needs ssh/rsync on the remote side and is ve

Re: alternative for rdiff-backup

2006-09-14 Thread Daniel Baumann
Kevin Mark wrote: > I would never suggest a takeover of a package that is being > maintained, only one that was not being maintained enough for the users > for a forthcomming release. Glad to hear that you are not MIA and that > you are keeping backports! as I said, I know you didn't know, so I do

Re: alternative for rdiff-backup

2006-09-14 Thread Ralph Katz
On 09/13/2006 01:00 PM, Michael Ott wrote: > Hello! > > rdiff-backup crashed every second use. > > And now I want a new backup system which work nearly like rdiff-backup: > Copy only last changed data to another box. But no problems when the > boxes lost the connection or something like that > >

Re: alternative for rdiff-backup

2006-09-14 Thread Kevin Mark
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:04:27PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Cameron L. Spitzer wrote: > > We did not use the rdiff-backup package from Debian > > because it's too old. > > rdiff-backup is and was always uptodate in Debian testing and unstable. > However, in sarge it is outdated, something I

Re: alternative for rdiff-backup

2006-09-14 Thread Daniel Baumann
Cameron L. Spitzer wrote: > We did not use the rdiff-backup package from Debian > because it's too old. rdiff-backup is and was always uptodate in Debian testing and unstable. However, in sarge it is outdated, something I can't fix, but aside of the unstable version, I also maintain the backport o

Re: alternative for rdiff-backup

2006-09-14 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:34:30PM -0700, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote: > [This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kevin Mark wrote: > > > > --ABTtc+pdwF7KHXCz > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Disposition: inline > > Content-T

Re: alternative for rdiff-backup

2006-09-13 Thread Cameron L. Spitzer
[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kevin Mark wrote: > > --ABTtc+pdwF7KHXCz > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 05:49:57PM +0100, M

Re: alternative for rdiff-backup

2006-09-13 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 05:49:57PM +0100, Michael Ott wrote: > Hello! > > rdiff-backup crashed every second use. Hi Michael, it seems a wiser thing to do to try to help the maintainer of rdiff-backup as both of you have an interest in seeing it work, that is if you have the inclination, time or kn

alternative for rdiff-backup

2006-09-13 Thread Michael Ott
Hello! rdiff-backup crashed every second use. And now I want a new backup system which work nearly like rdiff-backup: Copy only last changed data to another box. But no problems when the boxes lost the connection or something like that Any ideas Backup box is a nslu2 box CU